General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWill The Obama Admin. Step Into Michigan's Emergency Manager Fight? Here's Why The NAACP Hopes So...
By Tim Skubick | Politics Columnist for MLive.com
on April 02, 2013 at 6:30 AM, updated April 02, 2013 at 6:31 AM
The NAACP is making its case with the legal-eagles in the Obama administration that something is rotten, not in Denmark, but right here in Michigan.
Check out where Gov. Rick Snyder and previous administrations have installed emergency managers. The NAACP contends they are in areas where minorities are the majority population.
Can you say civil rights violations?
The leaders are saying exactly that and asking the Justice Department to do something about it.
Perhaps at no other time in state history has there been so much intervention, some would say assault, on the democracy in both cities and schools.
MORE...
http://www.mlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/04/tim_skubick_will_the_obama_adm.html#incart_river
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)The city government did nothing while Detroit went down the crapper.
Don't know about the other cities - were they going broke too?
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)Learn the history of Detroit a little.
Learn something about how the corporations chewed Detroit up and spit it out when the wages and conditions were getting too good for the people (aka too expensive for the corporations whose purpose is to increase profits to obscene levels while exploiting their workers more and more).
How all those uppity working class folks who actually made a good fucking living got screwed when companies went off in search of greener pastures (aka places with low wages and no unions).
How fucking paternalistic and condescending can you be?
Is Detroit all kinds of fucked up? Sure. It's also an excellent fucking city.
And the LAST thing it needs is an EM who can't even pay his own taxes.
Bay Boy
(1,689 posts)...but that doesn't change anything. Detroit city government needed to make changes as their population and tax base declined. They didn't and put themselves in the situation they are in.
CatWoman
(79,301 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)You rock.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)That's irrelevant. The only important thing now is stabilizing the city's finances and redevelotheping the city economically. The city government was not doing that
The situation was getting worse and even the most basic services, police and fire, would have been in jeopardy. Would anarchy have been preferable? The state has an obligation to protect all its citizens and had to step in.
JoeBlowToo
(253 posts)Do you really think that this takeover by corrupt and greedy Republicans will not lead to an exponentionally worse situation?
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)...and I doubt he could do a worse job than the existing city government. The only other optiuon would be bankruptcy with a judge doing the same things the EM will have to do.
JoeBlowToo
(253 posts)The real objective is to break all unions and political support for Democrats.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)neverforget
(9,436 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)I've asked this question a few times and no one has ever given me a better answer than an EM or banktruptcy.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)In the short term, I'd shrink the city's footprint to a manageable size and hand out haircuts to bondholders, labor contracts, retirees and others to whom the city owes money. The city has to live within its ability to raise revenue which is quite limited at this time. These are the same things that the EM or a bankruptcy judget would do. BTW, I'm OK with an EM
Longer term, I would attempt to develop plans to redevlop the city economically, but that will take decades.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)Geographical/neighborhood-based meetings and organizations for setting priorities, brainstorming ideas, making decisions, maybe to basically restructure the city gov't.
Elections to follow - without outside/corporate money. Old school campaigns. Face to face. Or however the community councils decide it should be done.
It's amazing what people can decide when propaganda and corruption are removed.
Building from the ground up based on the common good of the people who live there. What a thought.
A dysfunctional system cannot fix itself.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)You're not addressing that. Unfortunately, there is no solution that I see that does not involve accross the board pain.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)If banks are too big to fail, if auto companies are too big to fail- then so are our cities.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)If the feds bailed out Detroit, there would be steady parade of cities looking for a bailout. Stockton, California declared bankruptcy yesterday. I believe the fed's position would and should be it's a state and localmatter.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)remove people's elected leaders' powers. At all. I'd still oppose it if it were a Democratic governor, but it makes it worse that GOP Koch soldiers are the ones not only violating voters' wills in Detroit but across the state by enacting a law WE SHOT DOWN in November. That isn't government in America; that's a coup. That you don't get how that violates the entire premise of democracy would be laughable if it weren't so serious.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)In effect, the state grants the city power to govern, but it remains subordinate to the state. The state has the power to revoke the city charter and assume power if the city government becomes incompetent.
CatWoman
(79,301 posts)ALMOST as well as black shit like Clarence Thomas replacing Thurgood Marshal.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)You sided with the white GOP taking over majority black cities, and called the former adults and implied the latter were children.
You should probably stop digging.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)The racial makeup of the city is irrelevant if its government isn't doing an effective job. The reference to children needing supervision was aimed at the city council.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)The political disenfranchisement is bad enough as it is around the country, but this EM shit is just unconscionable. Indefensible.
A sucker punch to the concept of democracy.
demmiblue
(36,845 posts)But they should... the EM role makes a mockery of democracy.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... out of the Obama crew for regular people. Perhaps if the citizens of Detroit incorporate!
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)federal court over these Emergency Manager things. It seems to me as though it's a judicial matter. The President probably has no real role in this. It's a state issue and a voting rights issue, really. I think this will have to work its way through the federal judicial maze.
Trouble is, many states have some similar provision that allows the state to take over local government in some circumstances.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Has history forgotten already that Detroit already went through this song and dance with Robert Bobb? He left Detroit even deeper in debt after his stint as EM.
http://metrotimes.com/news/bobb-s-deep-debt-1.1047664
<snip>
Now, 18 months after Bobb took control of the district's finances, its fiscal house is in more disarray than ever, with critics saying that the public is deliberately being kept in the dark about just how bad the situation has grown while Bobb has been at the helm.
For starters, there is that cumulative budget deficit that precipitated the takeover. According to a deficit elimination plan released in July of this year, the district ended its 2008-09 fiscal year on June 30, 2009, with a cumulative deficit of $219 million.
At that time, Bobb, having taken credit for reducing the projected 2008-2009 deficit by $86 million through actions taken during his first few months on the job (a claim disputed by former School Board President Carla Scott, who says the elected board is responsible for keeping the 2008-2009 budget in check), declared that his cost-cutting measures would produce a budget surplus of $17 million by the time the 2009-2010 fiscal year came to an end.
Instead, that fiscal year the first full year during which finances were completely under Bobb's control concluded with an additional deficit of more than $113 million being added to the district's budget crisis, bringing the total cumulative deficit to $332 million. That's an increase of more than 51 percent over a 12-month period, and one of the largest single-year deficits in the history of the DPS.
"That was all Bobb's doing," former DPS budget director Walter Esau says of the $113 million deficit.
<snip>
What Detroit needs is a jobs program, something big, like the TVA back in the New Deal. The city that was the cradle of unionism and great progressive strides deserves better than these squalid economic hit-men.
freckleface
(57 posts)PDJane
(10,103 posts)They don't know the city, they don't understand the problems,and they tend to have a really republican bias. The country's economics are bent and broken by that republican bias. The cities under emergency management stay that way.
They have sold land that was granted as parkland for a golf course; land granted to the city for parks. They've tried to sell a public radio station on e-bay. They have been overturned by the citizens, and simply turned around and voted themselves the same powers again.
hack89
(39,171 posts)they have lost 60% of their population yet try to maintain the same infrastructure with a significantly smaller tax base. That is why they are billions in debt. Even if they were competently governed (which they were not) hard decisions would still have to be made concerning infrastructure, schools, city services and pensions. There is no evidence that the city government was willing to make such choices.
The Federal government could fund a program to buy up property and physically shrink the size of the city but it is foolish to think that Detroit will survive in its present form.
PDJane
(10,103 posts)The same way that it has in other places. The fact of the matter is that the men and women who are appointed to do this have no stake in turning the city around, and it is profoundly undemocratic.
hack89
(39,171 posts)perhaps it is better, though, for the people to make the hard choices. Then there would be no one to blame.