Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Study Finds Income Inequality Is Permanent" by Allison Brito at the National Memo
Study Finds Income Inequality Is Permanentby Allison Brito at the National Memo
http://www.nationalmemo.com/study-finds-income-inequality-is-permanent/#.UVNuafuC-H0.reddit
"SNIP......................................................
A recent Brookings Institution study reveals that the disparity between rich and poor is larger than ever, and is only expected to grow unless proper reforms are made. The paper, titled Rising Inequality: Transitory or Permanent? New Evidence from a Panel of U.S. Tax Returns, analyzes the growing and permanent inequality between rich and poor in the United States by looking at thousands of confidential tax returns to examine the progression of household income over the course of 23 years.
Brookings Papers on Economic Activity co-editor Justin Wolfers said of the findings, Its actually the rich are getting richer and staying richer. The poor, poorer and staying poorer. Now the tax system is somewhat helpful here. Yes, we have progressive taxes in the United States, and were it not for that, the authors show us, income inequality would have grown by more.
The phrase the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer has never been more true, and stating that the middle class is shrinking is not just political rhetoric but a matter of fact that can have serious consequences on the economy. This isnt the first study to confirm the growing gap in inequality, but what makes this Brookings study so compelling is its rare method it is not a survey, but instead an analysis based on over two decades worth of actual tax data.
During the 2012 presidential election, Mitt Romney called the debate on income disparity a bitter politics of envy, adding, I think its about class warfare. What Romney failed to see were the serious implications that growing income inequality can have on the economy and society. When individuals and households cant afford to purchase commodities, it affects businesses and stunts economic growth. The data presented in this study show that the attempt to close the inequality income gap is not an attack on the wealthy, but instead entirely necessary and in the best interest of society as a whole.
.....................................................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1381 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Study Finds Income Inequality Is Permanent" by Allison Brito at the National Memo (Original Post)
applegrove
Mar 2013
OP
rocktivity
(44,577 posts)1. Candidate for this year's "You Call This NEWS?" Award
That was the whole point, dont'cha know...
rocktivity
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)2. K&R
Thanks for posting.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)3. Call Miss Cleo. "Arrrr I tell u all you already know".