Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 04:42 PM Mar 2013

Is Clipping Articles Fair Use? U.S. Court Says No

http://mashable.com/2013/03/25/fair-use/

The term "fair use" gets thrown around a lot in copyright cases, and it refers to an exception to copyright law that allows for the publication of portions or derivations of a copyrighted work — without the permission of the original creator. On the web, fair use has been used to defend aggregators such as Google News, since they take portions of articles to create a service.

Does that label also apply to a service that does a similar thing, but for a newsletter? A U.S. court recently said it doesn't.

As paidContent describes, a federal court ruled that Meltwater, a Norwegian company that does "news and social media monitoring" was violating copyright with its newsletter service. Meltwater's service scans articles for keywords, then takes the headline, the first paragraph or "lede," and the parts of the story where the keyword appears.

The Associated Press sued Meltwater, saying it was violating the AP's copyright on the articles, and that it needed to purchase a license to serve up its content in this way. Meltwater defended its actions under copyright's fair-use doctrine, saying its newsletter service was doing basically the same thing that Google does every second of every day.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is Clipping Articles Fair Use? U.S. Court Says No (Original Post) steve2470 Mar 2013 OP
Details: elleng Mar 2013 #1
Just so long as it doesn't affect DU, or does it? I don't see the fine points (not-an-attorney). freshwest Mar 2013 #2
Wouldn't affect DU, as we carefully comply elleng Mar 2013 #3
Thanks! freshwest Mar 2013 #4
That's weird, clipping services have been used for decades Warpy Mar 2013 #5

elleng

(130,964 posts)
1. Details:
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 04:56 PM
Mar 2013

'While on first blush Meltwater's service doesn't appear to be all that different from Google News, it's all in the details.

The law around fair use inherently allows for flexibility, but whether or not a particular complaint amounts to a violation is dependent on four factors: the purpose of the duplicated content, the nature of the copyrighted work, how much of the original was copied, and the effect on the market. >>>

elleng

(130,964 posts)
3. Wouldn't affect DU, as we carefully comply
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 05:43 PM
Mar 2013

with requirements, to use only a limited portion and to identify sources.

Copyright is complex, saw an interview recently reaffirming that for me, so I can't elucidate the details. Here's the interview:

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/311003-3#

Warpy

(111,270 posts)
5. That's weird, clipping services have been used for decades
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 05:59 PM
Mar 2013

by people at all levels of government as well as by people in private industries. Those services comb major media for articles in various fields and compile them in daily, weekly or monthly report format. I suppose now they'll have to be done electronically with links and blurbs instead of clipped articles.

This is a bizarre ruling.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is Clipping Articles Fair...