Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 05:57 AM Mar 2013

US judge prompts outrage after saying: ‘If she didn’t want sex, her body should have just shut down’

US judge prompts outrage after saying: ‘If she didn’t want sex, her body should have just shut down’ in rape case, and reducing sentence of attacker by ten years


A US judge has prompted outrage after saying that a rape victim didn't put up a fight during her assault and that if someone doesn't want sex, the body 'will not permit that to happen.'

Judge Derek Johnson's comments, which echo those of outgoing U.S. representative Todd Akin, who used the phrase 'legitimate rape' and said women who are the victims of rape rarely get pregnant, have drawn widespread condemnation.

The states Commission on Judicial Performance has also attacked the the judge for taking ten years off the recommended sentence for the rapist in the case, imposing a six-year sentence instead.

...

According to police reports Judge Johnson said: 'I’m not a gynecologist, but I can tell you something, if someone doesn’t want to have sexual intercourse, the body shuts down. The body will not permit that to happen unless a lot of damage in inflicted, and we heard nothing about that in this case.

'That tells me that the victim in this case, although she wasn’t necessarily willing, she didn’t put up a fight.'

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-judge-prompts-outrage-after-saying-if-she-didnt-want-sex-her-body-should-have-just-shut-down-in-rape-case-and-reducing-sentence-of-attacker-by-ten-years-8414674.html

98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US judge prompts outrage after saying: ‘If she didn’t want sex, her body should have just shut down’ (Original Post) The Straight Story Mar 2013 OP
Just disgusting RockaFowler Mar 2013 #1
I didn't realize women had an "on", "off" switch. Amazing, what insights Conservatives have Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #15
Oh, but ideal Republican wives do. tanyev Mar 2013 #21
i think you've hit the nail on the head. eom ellenfl Mar 2013 #69
It goes along with having a magical body. BlueToTheBone Mar 2013 #49
As a flamboyant hetrosexual, I always thought women had magical bodies :) Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #52
Can you imagine having to live it? BlueToTheBone Mar 2013 #60
Yeah, sort of spooky reminds me of the Movie "Red State" Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #63
well that just scared hell out of me! BlueToTheBone Mar 2013 #66
It's very intense. Kevin Smith directed it. Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #68
That's what scares me! BlueToTheBone Mar 2013 #70
Damn, you have my sympathy. I just moved to New Orleans, great city, its the rest of the state that Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #71
You have my sympathy! BlueToTheBone Mar 2013 #72
Would that be Eureka Springs, Arkansas? bvar22 Mar 2013 #78
we looked in Mena, but it seemed too bleak BlueToTheBone Mar 2013 #87
Welcome to New Orleans! MountainLaurel Mar 2013 #88
I think the Off switch is called "Death" derby378 Mar 2013 #55
Very good point Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #57
Well, he should not be a judge union_maid Mar 2013 #2
Absolutely! This guy must be a dinosaur! No telling how much injustice he has dispensed on the Dustlawyer Mar 2013 #16
Exactly! City Lights Mar 2013 #42
"Doesn't belong on the bench." Doesn't belong on the ranch. nt Eleanors38 Mar 2013 #65
+10.000 smirkymonkey Mar 2013 #96
anyone saying this has a hatred for women newfie11 Mar 2013 #3
I'm not so sure... caseymoz Mar 2013 #9
^ this ^ mac56 Mar 2013 #17
What an incredible job of rationalizing misogyny and prejudice MotherPetrie Mar 2013 #23
Thank you atreides1 Mar 2013 #30
Boy you nailed it!!!!!!! newfie11 Mar 2013 #38
If yelling names and labels at them gets ONE on your side caseymoz Mar 2013 #50
You are the one presuming to know what's in their heads. I go by their actions. MotherPetrie Mar 2013 #56
so your dad thinks that women who got pregnant from rape wanted the rape? ellenfl Mar 2013 #74
I can't believe it shenmue Mar 2013 #4
This man is a judge, but knows nothing of justice DFW Mar 2013 #5
'I’m not a gynecologist, but I can tell you something", I play one while sitting in judgment. BlueJazz Mar 2013 #6
This happened in 2008; judge not censured until 2012 & remains on bench! Divernan Mar 2013 #7
Hey, Pope Pius XII said caseymoz Mar 2013 #13
He should be impeached kdmorris Mar 2013 #8
Outrage noted and deserved, but... TreasonousBastard Mar 2013 #10
See post #9, and. . . caseymoz Mar 2013 #14
Not sure how I missed that before I posted, but... TreasonousBastard Mar 2013 #35
Education, not influenced by religion nt newfie11 Mar 2013 #41
Educated where? Demo_Chris Mar 2013 #47
Narrow minded folk that refuse to listen to science newfie11 Mar 2013 #77
this is basic biology noiretextatique Mar 2013 #92
The it shows their ignorance. atreides1 Mar 2013 #43
You're right, with a few nuances. caseymoz Mar 2013 #67
Why he didn't lose his job over this is suspect treestar Mar 2013 #46
Not this again. mwb970 Mar 2013 #11
The short list is what is right with them. I can start the list with these. Kennah Mar 2013 #97
Decision of Judicial Performance Commission, including courtroom transcript. Divernan Mar 2013 #12
Woah davidthegnome Mar 2013 #18
How does anyone in this day & age actually say something that stupid? Myrina Mar 2013 #19
I thought this had to be some weird joke. polly7 Mar 2013 #26
I'd say: prob because the people who elected him think the same way. n/t winterpark Mar 2013 #27
There are a fair number of highly educated people that are as RKP5637 Mar 2013 #33
Petition to remove Judge Johnson from the bench: Bluenorthwest Mar 2013 #20
Nice, thank you for finding that link (nt) The Straight Story Mar 2013 #24
Done. Thanks! n/t RKP5637 Mar 2013 #29
Done. nt bemildred Mar 2013 #61
Awesome, Bluenorthwest! Sissyk Mar 2013 #89
He worked for the Orange County district attorney's sex crimes unit... BklnDem75 Mar 2013 #22
WTF is wrong with these damn fools. We need a system that kicks out these damn RKP5637 Mar 2013 #25
That judge does not belong on the bench MynameisBlarney Mar 2013 #28
Is the judge a member of the Taliban? marew Mar 2013 #31
Headache mr.ed Mar 2013 #32
Was the judge removed from the bench? No. Just admonished. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #34
Should Be Impeached erpowers Mar 2013 #36
When the rape is inevitable, crim son Mar 2013 #37
Here's the transcript AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #39
From the PDF - he found the whole rape to be 'technical' The Straight Story Mar 2013 #44
I think my head just exploded Recursion Mar 2013 #40
It's really disappointing that people theKed Mar 2013 #45
2 Jobs he is not Qualified For 4Q2u2 Mar 2013 #48
HE may have personal experience - with his wife.... socialindependocrat Mar 2013 #51
If you fight your rapist, you might die. If you Ilsa Mar 2013 #53
Another idiot who decided to be a judge. We have far too many of them. gtar100 Mar 2013 #54
can judges be recalled? Dyedinthewoolliberal Mar 2013 #58
'I’m not a gynecologist, but I can tell you something'...shut the fuck up dude spanone Mar 2013 #59
Could someone please remind me what century we are living in??? Beacool Mar 2013 #62
OMFG, how can such a person become a judge? Better question, How can he remain one? Coyotl Mar 2013 #64
How infinitely repulsive. Impeach him! LeftishBrit Mar 2013 #73
"U.S. Judge"...somewhat misleading.....here is why? Stuart G Mar 2013 #75
this is what we mean by rape culture. not donglegate but this. nt La Lioness Priyanka Mar 2013 #76
I don't know what else you'd call it. This should ENRAGE everyone. GaYellowDawg Mar 2013 #84
Was there some new development? Blue_Tires Mar 2013 #79
Yes - he is still working (nt) The Straight Story Mar 2013 #80
SHE DID NOT HAVE SEX YOU DUMB FUCKWIT. Rex Mar 2013 #81
that's infuriating. Whisp Mar 2013 #82
It is starting to drive me crazy! Rex Mar 2013 #83
take a break from du and the news. no really. it will be good for you La Lioness Priyanka Mar 2013 #85
Thanks. I do that from time to time. Rex Mar 2013 #91
it's def not just du. which is why when you need a break, you need a overall news break La Lioness Priyanka Mar 2013 #93
*spit* nt Zorra Mar 2013 #86
What does he even MEAN? sibelian Mar 2013 #90
This guy isn't fit to be a law professor, let alone a Superior Court judge. nomorenomore08 Mar 2013 #94
Judge Jackwagon Blue Owl Mar 2013 #95
What. The. Fuck. Apophis Mar 2013 #98
 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
15. I didn't realize women had an "on", "off" switch. Amazing, what insights Conservatives have
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 07:46 AM
Mar 2013

very cutting edge, 11th century cutting edge, but what the hey.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
52. As a flamboyant hetrosexual, I always thought women had magical bodies :)
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 10:37 AM
Mar 2013

Just didnt realize how magical obivously

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
60. Can you imagine having to live it?
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 11:02 AM
Mar 2013

So magical we can ward off sperm in its "bad" form, but accept it in its "good" form? Too bad we get no respect and are considered less than in all other ways!

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
63. Yeah, sort of spooky reminds me of the Movie "Red State"
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 11:10 AM
Mar 2013


I really wonder how long it takes before that sort of thinking gets us into real trouble.

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
70. That's what scares me!
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 11:53 AM
Mar 2013

I live in a rural area of a red state and there are paramilitary camps all over the place. It's a weird juxtaposition with the art community I live in in the middle of all that red hate. We will probably be their target, cause they hate gays and hippies.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
71. Damn, you have my sympathy. I just moved to New Orleans, great city, its the rest of the state that
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 12:06 PM
Mar 2013

makes me wary.

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
72. You have my sympathy!
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 12:09 PM
Mar 2013

We live in a little town called Eureka Springs. The locals destroyed the springs years ago as they are all contaminated with e.coli. But the countryside is beautiful and spring is on the way!

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
78. Would that be Eureka Springs, Arkansas?
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 04:43 PM
Mar 2013

If so, then you are my neighbor.
We moved from Minneapolis to the Ouachita Mountains (west of Mena) in 2006,
to grow our own food, and live as sustainably and independently as possible.
So far, so good.
Winter is sorta drab, but Spring is here,
and we are excited about the new growing season.
One of the reasons we picked this area is for the natural springs.
We drink straight from ours, and the water is cold, clear, delicious, and abundant.

Ignorance, poverty, and fundamentalism are a problem here,
but not as bad as we were prepared for. Things are changing as more people are gradually moving into this area everyday looking for the same things we came her for.
We have good respectful relations with most of the people in our area.

The area around Eureka Springs is especially beautiful,
but we chose further south for the longer growing season.

Its always good to find a neighbor.

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
87. we looked in Mena, but it seemed too bleak
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 05:33 PM
Mar 2013

Last edited Mon Mar 25, 2013, 06:14 PM - Edit history (1)

and my beloved is an artist and I don't think he would have made it! But it's great to know you're my neighbor! If you should come to ES, do let me know and we can meet in person!

Good luck with your garden this year!


grammer nazi in me demanded a correction

derby378

(30,252 posts)
55. I think the Off switch is called "Death"
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 10:43 AM
Mar 2013

And after triggering it, good luck ever getting that On switch to ever work again.

union_maid

(3,502 posts)
2. Well, he should not be a judge
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 06:17 AM
Mar 2013

Shoud be defrocked, debenched and if possible, disbarred. He does not belong on the bench.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
16. Absolutely! This guy must be a dinosaur! No telling how much injustice he has dispensed on the
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 07:49 AM
Mar 2013

bench!

newfie11

(8,159 posts)
3. anyone saying this has a hatred for women
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 06:17 AM
Mar 2013

Are we going backwards in time? They know this is a lie but spout it anyway. Shit this is something from the middle ages!

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
9. I'm not so sure...
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 07:17 AM
Mar 2013

My dad would say the same thing and he definitely didn't feel hate about it (or maybe didn't know the difference). He wasn't a hick either. He finished high school, was in the army enlisted in military intelligence, had some college and was corporate executive with a six-figure income.

No, he thought it was a fact, never checked it; never had a moral authority in the Catholic Church tell him it was wrong; distrusted medical authorities as corrupt and uninterested; and saw progressive and women's groups as, if not immoral, then untrustworthy on the subject.

Notice how distrust and suspicion play out there? Church teachings with Satan a deceiver behind the fight for good and evil doesn't help with that. So he's gone on believing this his entire life, and likely still does. I think his POV was actually typical in the Catholic Community. And my brothers are the same way and they both have college degrees.

The difference might be that this guy's a judge, but if the same walls of suspicion are up, and if there's the same dereliction in the authorities he does trust, you'll hear things like this. They think it's totally ordinary and look at you uncomprehending when you say they have any hatred toward women.

You might call this hatred. Fact is, if you actually do feel hatred all the time, always have, and that's all you know, how do you know it's hatred? Compare that to what you feel when somebody kills your children. There, you know your new emotion is hatred because you didn't feel it before. For something like this, though, it's been a constant in their emotional environment. It's why slavery wasn't considered wrong until the 19th century. Good people learned early to live with it and never noticed.

What I thought when I heard Todd Aikin was "Hi Dad." My father's probably even mystified as to why the Aikin didn't win.

I understand the feeling of being pulled back in time. I really thought this would be settled decades ago. How do you communicate the wrongness of this to people who are conditioned to be numb to it, and distrust your objection?

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
50. If yelling names and labels at them gets ONE on your side
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 10:24 AM
Mar 2013

and I mean makes them commit themselves to your cause, in your lifetime, then contact me, because I will worship you as a demigoddess.

You understand what's going in their heads so you can hack their thoughts and perhaps, somebody can form a strategy. This is far different than being an apologist for them.

But I guess having a hate-in for them is just so much less confusing. It's also better for rallying the troops, that's great if you're in an all out, total shooting war. That is, as long as you're on the winning side. But we're not in an all-out shooting war yet. And if we were, there's no certain victory here.

Isn't clear I rejected my father, brothers and my church of birth? I've paid a price because I'm not a misogynist and not an apologist for it. You and your cohorts who concur can go to Hell.

ellenfl

(8,660 posts)
74. so your dad thinks that women who got pregnant from rape wanted the rape?
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 12:27 PM
Mar 2013

i hope you and your siblings' wives are teaching their boys better than this. this is dreadful ignorance.

DFW

(54,405 posts)
5. This man is a judge, but knows nothing of justice
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 06:52 AM
Mar 2013

He is not a gynecologist? He is not much of a man, either.

Maybe his wife, if he has one, shuts down on him frequently, but that isn't surprising. He must be one disgusting character to lie in bed with anyway.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
7. This happened in 2008; judge not censured until 2012 & remains on bench!
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 07:01 AM
Mar 2013

"The commission noted (PDF) that Gurel, a Turkish citizen, stalked his girlfriend with a GPS device, made a bomb threat against her, faxed a nude photo of her to her workplace, vandalized her vehicle, then threatened to burn her with a heated screwdriver or just set her on fire before repeatedly forcing her to give him fellatio."
"Despite the public admonishment, Judge Johnson remains on the bench."
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/12/14/california-judge-admonished-for-saying-victims-body-should-have-shut-down-rape/
Quoting this obscene excuse for a judge:
He added: “That tells me that the victim in this case, although she wasn’t necessarily willing, she didn’t put up a fight. And to treat this case like the rape cases that we all hear about is an insult to victims of rape. I think it’s an insult. I think it trivializes a rape. I found this whole case to be a technical case. The rape is technical. The forced oral copulation is technical. It’s more of a crim law test than a real live criminal case.”

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
13. Hey, Pope Pius XII said
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 07:36 AM
Mar 2013

if a woman doesn't fight to the death against rape, she was going to Hell. He canonized a girl who was murdered by her rapist as an example of the proper thing to do, because chastity was that important to morality.

He was "infallible" and still has a great influence in the church.

When "infallible" moral authorities say that, what can you expect?

Though how a judge can make a distinction between a "technical violation" and a real crime, I don't know. I'm hoping, at least, that since the legal system is defining rape in terms of penetration, that there's no way to argue what's merely technical anymore.

However, his claim of having too much compassion for "real" rape victims to consider this guy culpable is the apex of moral conceit, and deceit.

kdmorris

(5,649 posts)
8. He should be impeached
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 07:06 AM
Mar 2013

So sick of these idiots saying things like that...the body shuts down... sure, yeah, because women's bodies are made of some magic rape repellent material??????

W...T...F??

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
10. Outrage noted and deserved, but...
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 07:25 AM
Mar 2013

is anyone asking how people in positions of grave responsibility and leadership get these weird ideas?

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
14. See post #9, and. . .
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 07:45 AM
Mar 2013

They hear it from someone they respect when they're say, nine years old, and never check the fact with anyone who would actually know. By the time they're old enough to question, they've already been guided to trust other ignorant people as authorities on the matter and distrust educated people.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
35. Not sure how I missed that before I posted, but...
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 09:02 AM
Mar 2013

yes, attitudes and beliefs are instilled at an early age and become hard to change as one gets older.

And, unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any great call for such change.

 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
47. Educated where?
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 09:25 AM
Mar 2013

I am about as ignorant of female mechanics as one can be, but even I know this is Judge's ideas are 1st century nonsense.

newfie11

(8,159 posts)
77. Narrow minded folk that refuse to listen to science
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 03:30 PM
Mar 2013

You know the ones that have man and dinosaurs living together.

There are people that refuse to believe science and listen to like minded idiots.

So yes education does enlighten one but only if you are willing to absorb it.

Check out the crap spewed on Fox News and the gullible folks that believe everything.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
92. this is basic biology
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 06:11 PM
Mar 2013

it shouldn't have any thing to do with "beliefs." clearly this judge doesn't how women's bodies work, and if anyone thinks that's acceptable, they are dumb as he is.

atreides1

(16,079 posts)
43. The it shows their ignorance.
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 09:14 AM
Mar 2013

We are all subjected to what others tell us as we grow older. But at some point in time it becomes our personal responsibility to find out for ourselves how things really work.

It shows a lack of wanting to be responsible when you continue to follow what someone else tells you...if the church tells you that a woman who doesn't die fighting her rapist is going to hell, and you believe it, then it speaks volumes about your lack of humanity and your subconscious hatred for women!

Many people in my life have always told me you are never too old to learn...but you have to be willing to learn. People like Akin and this judge and possibly your own father were never willing to step out of their "safe" zones...and that's where they have failed!

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
67. You're right, with a few nuances.
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 11:23 AM
Mar 2013

First, they probably don't remember where they originally got the idea. If that's the case, how do they know they've been following somebody else's wishes? Maybe they just think that they're willfully concurring with their church's teachings, for instance, and didn't look at the implications then. By the time they reach full adulthood, it looks normal.

But then there's the people who take the ideas and make them their own. Pope Pius. A Pope who leads other people has taken time analyzing it.

If he thinks on the subject, and doesn't find the mistake, if he's actually coming up with new reasons and arguments to be contemptuous toward women, who, say, didn't want to die resisting rape, that can only be described as hellbent. Because he's adding his own fantasies to it. That requires some kind of emotional impetus.

He deserves contempt and no sympathy about it. Off topic, but he also aided the rise of Nazism and awarded fascists like Franco and Salazar medals. Not a good person.

This judge, if what happened to Aikin did not make him re-exam thinking, he deserves to be disbarred. I mean, he's a judge. His work is intellectual. He shouldn't be in place of authority.

Unfortunately, almost any follower can become a leader sometime.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
46. Why he didn't lose his job over this is suspect
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 09:24 AM
Mar 2013

People get fired for posting stupid shit on Facebook. Yet a federal judge can say something like this in the 21st century - and he can easily be replaced.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
12. Decision of Judicial Performance Commission, including courtroom transcript.
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 07:33 AM
Mar 2013
http://cjp.ca.gov/res/docs/public_admon/Johnson_DO_Pub_Adm_12-13-2012.pdf
California Commission on Judicial Performance, Public Admonishment of Derek G. Johnson: December 13, 2012 pages 3-5.
Read the transcript of the Commission, which includes findings of fact in trial as to the rapist's insane, ongoing threats and behaviors to the victim; and the judge's rant to the prosecuting attorney, and you can only conclude that this judge (who is now only halfway through his 8 year term of office) is beneath contempt and a disgrace to judges everywhere.

The remaining question is whether deep red Orange County (I used to live in Anaheim, and know whereof I speak) will re-elect this monster.
















Myrina

(12,296 posts)
19. How does anyone in this day & age actually say something that stupid?
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 08:32 AM
Mar 2013
Especially someone who's apparently been through about 20 years of schoolin' ?

polly7

(20,582 posts)
26. I thought this had to be some weird joke.
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 08:47 AM
Mar 2013

I feel awful for the women in his circle, can't imagine putting up with such a backward, stupid person in real life.

Each and every sexual assault case he's presided over should be reviewed. I wonder how many women haven't gotten justice and are living even more tortured lives because of him.

RKP5637

(67,111 posts)
33. There are a fair number of highly educated people that are as
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 08:58 AM
Mar 2013

stupid as a bag of rocks. And, he well might hate women and/or think rape is a lot of fun. One never knows without a mental evaluation what is going on in these peoples minds. Another example are sociopaths that function as CEOs.

Sissyk

(12,665 posts)
89. Awesome, Bluenorthwest!
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 05:41 PM
Mar 2013

THAT is a great first step to getting this uneducated, bigoted judge out of office!

Keep on pushing!

BklnDem75

(2,918 posts)
22. He worked for the Orange County district attorney's sex crimes unit...
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 08:45 AM
Mar 2013

I wonder how many rape cases went unreported. How did this idiot rise through the system with his stance?

'I wanted to give Judge Derek Johnson the benefit of the doubt—after all, his primary concern is not trivializing rape! But he appears to believe vaginas have some sort of snapping mechanism and the only way that a rapist can really rape you is by breaking the hinges. Which still doesn't explain why he thinks having someone tell you to open your snapper or else he'll break your vulval hinges doesn't count as rape. If someone points a gun at a store clerk and tells them to open the cash drawer or else, it's still a robbery even though the register does, in fact, have a sealing mechanism designed to keep intruders out.'

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/12/14/judge_derek_johnson_admonished_claimed_rape_victim_didn_t_put_up_a_fight.html

RKP5637

(67,111 posts)
25. WTF is wrong with these damn fools. We need a system that kicks out these damn
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 08:47 AM
Mar 2013

fools at all levels of power in this country. Just because someone rises in a profession has absolutely no bearing on their continued competency.

MynameisBlarney

(2,979 posts)
28. That judge does not belong on the bench
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 08:53 AM
Mar 2013

I wonder, if it's possible to sue a judge that hands down a fucking ridiculous and highly insulting verdict like that...

marew

(1,588 posts)
31. Is the judge a member of the Taliban?
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 08:56 AM
Mar 2013

Don't they execute women who have been raped?

What if it had been his wife or daughter?

This is absolutely infuriating. He should be recalled immediately!

mr.ed

(18 posts)
32. Headache
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 08:57 AM
Mar 2013

Well, now she really has a headache, the often used marital "no." I'd like to ask how much bigger and more powerful he was than she, and if the difference was so huge,why she gave up trying to struggle.. In any case, the judge should try getting some of that rape stuff himself, just to see what a big, strong guy can do to somebody smaller.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
34. Was the judge removed from the bench? No. Just admonished.
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 08:58 AM
Mar 2013


"Superior Court Judge Derek Johnson made vulgar comments during the case of a now convicted rapist in 2008. Metin Gurel was convicted to six years in jail for rape, forcible oral copulation, domestic battery, stalking, and making threats against his former girlfriend. The suspect was also suspected of threatening to mutilate the face and genitals of his ex-girlfriend with a heated screwdriver and beat her with a metal baton."

http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local/orange_county&id=8920887


Somehow it doesn't seem that this ordeal is going to be over for the victim.

Her attacker, a felon with a propensity towards violence, will eventually be released.

When that happens, what you would recommend? Go back to court and get a restraining order? Hide, without any self-defense weapon, for as long as possible? Call the police and wait for them to show up? Put Dianne Feinstein's telephone number on speed-dial?

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
36. Should Be Impeached
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 09:06 AM
Mar 2013

This judge should be impeached from the bench. There is no reason that guy's sentence should have been reduced. Not only did he rape his ex-girlfriend, but he threatened to mutilate her face and her genitals. Just due to the fact that he threatened bodily harm to his ex-girlfriend he should have had his original sentence maintained.

In addition, the judge acknowledged that the woman was unwilling to participate. If she was unwilling to participate it was rape.

Furthermore, if her body had shut down how would she have been able to put up a fight. It seems to me that even if a woman's body was able to shut down because she/it did not want to get raped that would make it easier to rape a woman.



crim son

(27,464 posts)
37. When the rape is inevitable,
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 09:07 AM
Mar 2013

women are advised not to fight, to minimize the damage Judge Johnson was talking about. I wonder if he believes a man can be raped? Wouldn't the whole "shutting down" process make that impossible?

Sickening.

theKed

(1,235 posts)
45. It's really disappointing that people
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 09:18 AM
Mar 2013

with such a lack of understanding and intellect come to be in positions of power.

 

4Q2u2

(1,406 posts)
48. 2 Jobs he is not Qualified For
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 10:05 AM
Mar 2013

Well he admitted in open court that he is not a gynecologist, and his actions show that he is not a judge. After we pull out of Afghanistan I am sure the Taliban will need Judges as they take the country back over, he would a great fit for them.

I always did like California's Judicial review vote. I am not a big fan of Judge for life strait out of the gate. We the people should see that these people are acting properly on the bench before a lifetime pass on Checks and Balances.

socialindependocrat

(1,372 posts)
51. HE may have personal experience - with his wife....
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 10:34 AM
Mar 2013

So after all the brew-ha-ha with Aiken and all the publicity
the judge still is trying to perpetuate a myth about rape
and women's bodies.

In other situations where it is clear that someone is lacking in information they
are required to take a class in order to update their information base. He should
be required to take a course and if he fails he should take it again!

Why is it always the old white guys who are so out of touch?

May be a good reason to put an age limit on the SCOTUS

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
53. If you fight your rapist, you might die. If you
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 10:37 AM
Mar 2013

don't fight your rapist, you'll never get justice.
Tough choices, huh?
And then there is a point in the rape when a woman's body betrays her. Not due to enjoyment, but because her body knows to protect itself. It's horrible.

This bastard needs to lose his job. And I can't help but wish for more kharma on him.

gtar100

(4,192 posts)
54. Another idiot who decided to be a judge. We have far too many of them.
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 10:42 AM
Mar 2013

I wish there were more liberal-minded judges but apparently choosing to be not so judgmental of others also means being less likely to wanting to be a judge.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
62. Could someone please remind me what century we are living in???
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 11:07 AM
Mar 2013

"Judge Derek Johnson's comments, which echo those of outgoing U.S. representative Todd Akin, who used the phrase 'legitimate rape' and said women who are the victims of rape rarely get pregnant, have drawn widespread condemnation."

Where do these people get their information?? If nothing else, don't they have women at home who can explain to them how the female body works? If someone raped their wives or daughters, would they tell them that they should have "just shut down their bodies"?

Unbelievable.........

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
64. OMFG, how can such a person become a judge? Better question, How can he remain one?
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 11:13 AM
Mar 2013

Time for a forced retirement without pension for being so fucking evil.

Stuart G

(38,434 posts)
75. "U.S. Judge"...somewhat misleading.....here is why?
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 12:46 PM
Mar 2013

Because our system of justice is multi-tierred...state, local federal..the headline, leads someone to believe that it was a "U.S." or federal judge..but it was a Orange County California judge.......not a federal judge..Well..why did that news source say that???

Because it was a UK news source., NOT A source in the Unted States....the Independent is a UK source...


at the bottom of the story...way down it says this:

"The judge, who has been with Orange County Superior Court since 2000 also said the rape was 'technical' and not 'a real, live criminal case.'".....


Probably elected in a local election. Few if any know about who is running in judge elections..(and that includes me)

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
81. SHE DID NOT HAVE SEX YOU DUMB FUCKWIT.
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 05:10 PM
Mar 2013

SHE WAS RAPED! Please God, someone beam me up! I've HAD IT with this planet!!!

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
82. that's infuriating.
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 05:13 PM
Mar 2013

but you hear that all the time, and not only from braindead teabaggers.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
83. It is starting to drive me crazy!
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 05:16 PM
Mar 2013

I want to so believe that it is due to ignorance, but you and I both know it is not.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
85. take a break from du and the news. no really. it will be good for you
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 05:23 PM
Mar 2013

i do it from time to time. dont let it burn you out

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
91. Thanks. I do that from time to time.
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 06:03 PM
Mar 2013

Can't let my blood pressure get the best of me. I am just tired of the stupid and it is not just DU. How can a person that holds a supposed 'high office' believe sex and rape are the same thing? I just don't get it. And I really don't believe it either.

Thanks - - - I needed that hug.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
93. it's def not just du. which is why when you need a break, you need a overall news break
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 06:12 PM
Mar 2013

gotta take care of yourself from time to time, it's an important part of activism

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
90. What does he even MEAN?
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 05:42 PM
Mar 2013

I simply cannot imagine what he thinks he's talking about. What does he think women are?

Even if there WAS some weird, alien fucked up "rape recognition software" wired into her nervous systm that switched her off if she didn't want sex and it DIDN'T switch off in this case, it doesn't matter, rape has nothing to do with whether or not a women wants sex at the time or not, if she doesn't consent she doesn't consent, that's IT. What the fuck... "she was gagging for it so it's not rape..." - WHAT?

What IS all this bullshit?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US judge prompts outrage ...