Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dajoki

(10,678 posts)
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 06:41 PM Feb 2012

Romney: "I'm Not Concerned With the Very Poor"

http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/769247/romney%3A_%22i%27m_not_concerned_with_the_very_poor%22_%28while_fellow_.001ers_pony_up_for_his_super_pac%29/

Romney: "I'm Not Concerned With the Very Poor" (While Fellow .001%ers Pony Up for His Super PAC)


Oh, dear. Robot Romney's wires have malfunctioned again, just when he should have been soaking up his win in Florida last night.

Check out this unfortunate soundbite from a CNN interview this morning, in which the .006%er said he wasn't concerned about the very poor:

http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/politics/2012/02/01/point-romney-poor-safety-net.cnn


The Washington Post reports on the exchange:


“I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there,” Romney told CNN. “If it needs repair, I’ll fix it. I’m not concerned about the very rich, they’re doing just fine. I’m concerned about the very heart of the America, the 90 percent, 95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling.”

Host Soledad O’Brien pointed out that the very poor are probably struggling too.

“The challenge right now — we will hear from the Democrat party the plight of the poor,” Romney responded, after repeating that he would fix any holes in the safety net. “And there’s no question it’s not good being poor and we have a safety net to help those that are very poor .?.?. My focus is on middle income Americans ... we have a very ample safety net and we can talk about whether it needs to be strengthened or whether there are holes in it. but we have food stamps, we have Medicaid, we have housing vouchers, we have programs to help the poor.”



As one of the richest Americans with a now-revealed low tax rate and numerous offshore accounts, Romney can't come off this callous about the safety net--particularly when so many Americans are one misfortune away from joining that group.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
2. I see this as a Mormon thing. No Catholic or Protestant would put those words out,
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 06:55 PM
Feb 2012

too many Bible quotes make that an automatic ticket punched straight to hell.

The Mormons have in place an admittedly quite effective social system which takes care of the poor already. Mostly the Mormon poor. To them this isn't going to sound just flatout cruel.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
7. They have been dismantling the safety net for decades now.
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 07:09 PM
Feb 2012

People are joining the homeless and the hungry and the ill who make up the very poor now.

johnnie

(23,616 posts)
8. " we will hear from the Democrat party"
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 07:15 PM
Feb 2012

This guy doesn't even know the name of the party he is running against?

JI7

(89,249 posts)
10. Someone needs Audio of These Comments next to his "Corporations are People"
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 09:51 PM
Feb 2012

notice how defensive he was with corporations but hateful and dismissive about the poor.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
12. or his comments about how he loves to fire people
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 09:55 PM
Feb 2012

or make casual $10,000 bets. Something tells me the list will be getting longer, especially if Romney has more candid unscripted moments where he shows us how he really thinks.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
11. I could almost respect him for saying that out loud ...
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 09:54 PM
Feb 2012

As despicable as the thought is ..it is probably one of the few very true beliefs he's verbalized.

quaker bill

(8,224 posts)
13. "we have programs"
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 09:59 PM
Feb 2012

This is a classic. It is why there are vastly underfunded and understaffed "programs" for so many things, politicians love the "we have a program for that" dodge.

Every so often they do an "accountability" audit of the underfunded and understaffed "programs", find them lacking and fire a few civil servants, put new ones in place and continue underfunding and understaffing with a "new management" that will make it all better....

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Romney: "I'm Not Con...