At 10th Anniversary of U.S. Invasion of Iraq: When WikiLeaks Exposed 'War Logs'
http://www.thenation.com/blog/173406/10th-anniversary-us-invasion-iraq-when-wikileaks-exposed-war-logs
***SNIP
Getting in on the WikiLeaks action for the first time, Al Jazeera suggested that the real bombshell was the U.S. allowing Iraqis to torture detainees. Documents revealed that U.S. soldiers sent 1300 reports to headquarters with graphic accounts, including a few about detainees beaten to death. Some U.S. generals wanted our troops to intervene, but Pentagon chiefs disagreed, saying these assaults should only be reported, not stopped. At a time the U.S. was declaring that no torture was going on, there were 41 reports of such abuse still happening and yet the U.S. chose to turn its back.
The New York Times report on the torture angle included this: The six years of reports include references to the deaths of at least six prisoners in Iraqi custody, most of them in recent years. Beatings, burnings and lashings surfaced in hundreds of reports, giving the impression that such treatment was not an exception. In one case, Americans suspected Iraqi Army officers of cutting off a detainees fingers and burning him with acid. Two other cases produced accounts of the executions of bound detainees.
And while some abuse cases were investigated by the Americans, most noted in the archive seemed to have been ignored, with the equivalent of an institutional shrug: soldiers told their officers and asked the Iraqis to investigate
.That policy was made official in a report dated May 16, 2005, saying that if US forces were not involved in the detainee abuse, no further investigation will be conducted until directed by HHQ. In many cases, the order appeared to allow American soldiers to turn a blind eye to abuse of Iraqis on Iraqis.
Amnesty International quickly called on the U.S. to investigate how much our commanders knew about Iraqi torture.