General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI miss Ed already. Chime in if you do, too.
He's not on tonight. I still wonder who will pick up the banner for workers' rights. No one else on MSNBC even touches on it.
Not only that, Ed was great on public education.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)...which is the #1 progressive radio show out there.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)and dropping the progressive show hosts.
Laurian
(2,593 posts)senseandsensibility
(17,077 posts)I might be mad at MSNBC, but progressives don't have a lot of choices.
Laurian
(2,593 posts)coverage of the Steubenville case this weekend. Anderson just did a full 15 minutes on the rape case, and his segment was totally appropriate. Almost as if to try to make up for yesterday's horror.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)He's at least funny.
senseandsensibility
(17,077 posts)I wonder how much longer we will have his show?
Cleita
(75,480 posts)But he'll be there at least until July. I do like his show.
hlthe2b
(102,304 posts)He'd become like a friendly ole teddy bear looking out for the 99%... I miss our big ole redhead...
Swamp Lover
(431 posts)fadedrose
(10,044 posts)PDittie
(8,322 posts)doing a fine job tonight. The Steubenville coverage by CNN (abominable) with a panel of three young women, and the Portman out-of-the-closet POV from a young black gay man. Not the typical talking heads on TV (which is what I have always appreciated about all of MSNBC's evening shows).
onehandle
(51,122 posts)In the old days whenever I would bring him up, people would call him a conservative at heart, and a Rush clone.
Glad people came around.
senseandsensibility
(17,077 posts)I thought he lacked knowledge, seemed sexist with women callers, and rough around the edges. But he evolved and improved. He sealed the deal with me by concentrating on labor and education. I realized that his heart was in the right place, and he made real efforts to improve his coverage of womens' issues. He will never be suave, sophisticated, or wonkish but he is not afraid to stand up for workers and public education. On his last or second to last show, he made a strong stand against ANY cuts to "the big three" as he calls them. I just don't hear this from the others on MSNBC.
green for victory
(591 posts)n 1992, Schultz became a conservative political talk show host on WDAY-AM
Schultz's political views leaned towards the right during the early years, and Schultz told the Los Angeles Times that he "lined up with the Republicans because they were anti-tax and I wanted to make a lot of money".
In the late 1990s, Schultz claims a series of events changed his political views from the far right to left of center..."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Shultz
He didn't change any of his "views"- he realized he could yell and scream and make a lot of money by faking some kind of "conversion". Shultz is a blowhard who didn't do the Democrats any favors while he was insulting everyone alive on his "show". Good riddance to bad rubbish. MSNBC will find another fake "liberal" soon enough.
Progressive dog
(6,905 posts)I thought that last week was end of Ed Show. Apparently not quite over yet.
elzenmahn
(904 posts)...now THAT, more than anything, is probably why Big Eddie is being sent to Weekend Siberia.
The owners of this country can't have that now, can they?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)usually gets ignored.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)and that he intended to continue in Ed's footsteps regarding that. He said he was aware that people were concerned about that and wanted to set their minds at ease. He also has some of his own background where he has supported workers rights himself in other jobs (maybe journalist). I of course am paraphrasing what I heard him say but that was the gist of it.
zeeland
(247 posts)loved by all, he filled a void with his passion for workers rights and healthcare
that will not be easily replaced. Wherever Ed lands I'll be there watching or listening.