Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 04:51 PM Feb 2012

(Breaking) NYT: Panetta Says U.S. Plans To End Combat Role In Afghanistan In 2013 - updated

NYT: Panetta Says U.S. Plans To End Combat Role In Afghanistan In 2013

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta says the U.S. plans to end its combat role in Afghanistan in 2013, according to a New York Times breaking news alert.

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/updates/4994


Panetta Sets End to Afghan Combat Role for U.S. in '13

By ELISABETH BUMILLER

BRUSSELS — In a major milestone toward ending a decade of war in Afghanistan, Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta said on Wednesday that American forces would step back from a combat role there as early as mid-2013, more than a year before all American troops are scheduled to come home.

Mr. Panetta cast the decision as an orderly step in a withdrawal process long planned by the United States and its allies, but his comments were the first time that the United States had put a date on stepping back from its central role in the war. The defense secretary’s words reflected the Obama administration’s eagerness to bring to a close the second of two grinding ground wars it inherited from the Bush administration.

Promising the end of the American combat mission in Afghanistan next year would also give Mr. Obama a certain applause line in his re-election stump speech this fall.

Mr. Panetta said no decisions had been made about the number of American troops to be withdrawn in 2013, and he made clear that substantial fighting lies ahead. “It doesn’t mean that we’re not going to be combat-ready; we will be, because we always have to be in order to defend ourselves,” he told reporters on his plane on his way to a NATO meeting in Brussels, where Afghanistan is to be a central focus.

- more -

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/02/world/asia/panetta-moves-up-end-to-us-combat-role-in-afghanistan.html


13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(Breaking) NYT: Panetta Says U.S. Plans To End Combat Role In Afghanistan In 2013 - updated (Original Post) ProSense Feb 2012 OP
Kick! n/t ProSense Feb 2012 #1
K&R hedgehog Feb 2012 #2
Excellent! I wish it were sooner, but MineralMan Feb 2012 #3
Yup! n/t ProSense Feb 2012 #8
K&R • The oppositions list is getting shorter and shorter Whisp Feb 2012 #4
unhappycamper it nailed this Saturday bigtree Feb 2012 #5
Cool n/t ProSense Feb 2012 #6
Don't think we need to worry about leaving behind any big ass embassy here NNN0LHI Feb 2012 #7
Probably because they will need those troops in Iran! Yavapai Feb 2012 #9
You're ProSense Feb 2012 #10
If war with Iran breaks out, the troops in Afghanistan will be toast. FarCenter Feb 2012 #12
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees! malaise Feb 2012 #11
K&R! I just saw this story on CNN. n/t jenmito Feb 2012 #13

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)
3. Excellent! I wish it were sooner, but
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 05:03 PM
Feb 2012

it will end. Iraq no longer has US troops. Once we're out of Afghanistan, the entire Bush war stupidity will finally be at an end. Thank you, Mr. President!

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
4. K&R • The oppositions list is getting shorter and shorter
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 05:04 PM
Feb 2012

to twitch and moan about -and I don't mean the Republicans.

NNN0LHI

(67,190 posts)
7. Don't think we need to worry about leaving behind any big ass embassy here
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 05:36 PM
Feb 2012

This exit is going to look a lot like the fall of Saigon.

Karzai and his brother will be on the first plane out.

Don

 

Yavapai

(825 posts)
9. Probably because they will need those troops in Iran!
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 06:21 PM
Feb 2012

After all, isn't the Republican chant "four more wars, four more wars?"

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
10. You're
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 07:08 PM
Feb 2012

"Probably because they will need those troops in Iran! After all, isn't the Republican chant 'four more wars, four more wars?'"

...envisioning a Repubican President?



 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
12. If war with Iran breaks out, the troops in Afghanistan will be toast.
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 07:11 PM
Feb 2012

Landlocked, without supplies, and under attack.

They are what you call in the game of Go "dead stones".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»(Breaking) NYT: Panetta S...