General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWill's lost whatever's left of his mind- No “scientific basis" for same-sex marriage.”
___________________
. . . worrying about "altering foundational social institutions."
tweeted by, NomdeB ?@NomdeB
Not sure one can even begin to respond to this silly, silly column about SSM: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/george-will-the-shaky-science-behind-same-sex-marriage/2013/03/15/ccdbe82a-8cc9-11e2-9f54-f3fdd70acad2_story.html
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...born with a silver FOOT in his mouth.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)was a national treasure.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Two Texans that did their state proud!!!!!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Both were wonderful women!
Kber
(5,043 posts)Any state to produce such strong intelligent and funny women can't be all bad.
Of course, being from NJ I might be over sensitive to state wide stereotypes.
monmouth3
(3,871 posts)the slurs. My in-laws from Michigan were shocked to see what a beautiful State Jersey is. They were told awful things..
Kber
(5,043 posts)and had a similar reaction.
On the other hand, my teenage son wanted to get a shirt that read "I'm from NJ. Yeah - we don't like you either." on it. I vetoed it. I know we have a reputation for being a bit rough around the edges or even rude at times, but I see no need to feed that steriotype.
But enough about Chris Christie.
monmouth3
(3,871 posts)marmar
(77,081 posts)nt
zbdent
(35,392 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)we'd want to say fucking up children's lives is acceptable for either one, SSM/NSSM, just that the baseline should be something like "people seeking life, liberty, and happiness" with one another should not be un-necessarily handicapped by the collective and certainly NSSM has no corner on producing life, liberty, and happiness. I HOPE SSM will do better, but it's not just to punish them for failing along the same parameters that NSSM has.
Freddie
(9,267 posts)Interesting that George Will and Keith Olbermann--can we find 2 any more opposite people??--are both baseball nuts.
siligut
(12,272 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,670 posts)Getting beyond the fact that it's an idiotic position (meaning the anti-equality lobby position) based on bronze age texts and mores, why doesn't the science matter in other issues like global climate change?
As usual, science only matters if it 'supports' their position, which in this case I'm pretty sure it doesn't. So then they fall back on the "There is no (or, of course, insufficient) scientific data" argument, which is generally false, in that there usually is but they don't accept it. It's pretty easy to declare the science 'insufficient' when you don't like the outcome.
The answer to his posit is of course, Do you have scientific proof that the ban on same sex marriage has any affect on society at all?
The ony real objection to equality is a religious one, not a secular or scientific one, which means it has no place in our constitution or legislation at any level of government.
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)He's has good reasons to be concerned about consequences.
From the scorn with which he attacks the "vulgarian" Clintons and their "pantomime of domesticity," one might assume that Will's personal life has been entirely dignified and free from scandal. One might be surprised to read, in other words, that in the 1980s, while still married to his first wife, Will was romantically linked to Lally Weymouth, daughter of Washington Post owner Katharine Graham, according to Washingtonian magazine (1/87). When Will moved out on his wife and children, he found his office furniture dumped on his front lawn with a note reading, "Take it somewhere else, buster" (Salon, 2/12/98). Though the lamentable lack of shame in U.S. society is a common theme in Will's writing, shame, like other principles he touts, seems to be for other people.
siligut
(12,272 posts)A hallmark for successful hacks.
CanSocDem
(3,286 posts)...from the apolitical masses who believe "science" explains everything.
.
bigtree
(85,998 posts). . . though the bulk of their party won't accept science when it comes to the origin of humans.
randome
(34,845 posts)Interesting thesis, Mr. Will.
But...then...what about when the biochemical reactions...never mind. Go away, Mr. Will.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)it still sounds incredibly backwards and bigoted.
Free the slaves? Well lets do some studies first, be sure how it impacts society.
Give women the Vote? I'm gonna need some more research on that.