Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

we can do it

(12,189 posts)
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 11:38 AM Mar 2013

Sorry, but I can't write Rob Portman a thank you for doing what he should have done all along.

He's a typical republican slime ball who only looks out for himself. Now that he has discovered his child is gay NOW it's ok. Well that doesn't fly with me. It was his ilk that pushed this nasty change to the Ohio constitution.....

"According to the Ohio Constitution, only a union between one man and one woman is recognized as a valid marriage by the state and its political subdivisions. The Ohio Constitution also says that neither the state nor any political subdivision may create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance or effect of marriage.

In addition, Ohio law says that any marriage between persons of the same sex is against the strong public policy of the state, has no legal force or effect, is void ab initio (null from the beginning) and will not be recognized. "

https://www.ohiobar.org/forpublic/resources/lawyoucanuse/pages/lawyoucanuse-545.aspx

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sorry, but I can't write Rob Portman a thank you for doing what he should have done all along. (Original Post) we can do it Mar 2013 OP
Agreed. And the worse part is that he probably doesn't even see the hipocracy of it all. n/t CincyDem Mar 2013 #1
he probably doesn't even see the hypocrisy of it all Flashmann Mar 2013 #3
Gotta have principles or morals to find the grounds, eh? Not with and "R" after your name. n/t CincyDem Mar 2013 #4
I don't see how any good and moral human can identify as a republican anymore. we can do it Mar 2013 #17
He probably used a PR agency/image consultant to plan how to reveal his son's sexual identity Kolesar Mar 2013 #2
Cynical much? Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2013 #5
........and he probably used taxpayer funds to do so while calling for austerity. we can do it Mar 2013 #9
It's just as Rachel stated on Real Time last night ... Zen Democrat Mar 2013 #6
Now I am even more disgusted with the piece of shit. we can do it Mar 2013 #8
I agree, and Krugman it the nail...but don't tell Connie Schultz, she Ninga Mar 2013 #7
So no one ever gets forgiven? That makes change impossible. nolabear Mar 2013 #10
Only someone who deserves it not this weasel (see post 6. his son came out to him in 2011) we can do it Mar 2013 #11
I'm sorry. I probably have a breaking point too but it's a different one. nolabear Mar 2013 #14
You are cool, we all have a tipping point or too. I can tell you try just by your response. we can do it Mar 2013 #15
Portman continued voting anti-gay long after his son came out.. Cha Mar 2013 #12
Thank you. we can do it Mar 2013 #13
K&R forestpath Mar 2013 #16

Flashmann

(2,140 posts)
3. he probably doesn't even see the hypocrisy of it all
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 11:58 AM
Mar 2013

Of course not....His ilk can only bring themselves to do the right things,when it's either politically expedient or it hits home....Doing right things on principle or moral grounds never occur to them...

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
2. He probably used a PR agency/image consultant to plan how to reveal his son's sexual identity
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 11:54 AM
Mar 2013

...and how to time it to improve his chances in the 2016 presidential primaries. But what do I know?

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,414 posts)
5. Cynical much?
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 12:06 PM
Mar 2013

but you're probably right. Of course, I believe he's up for re-election next year. Wonder if this will get him primaried and if so, will he fight for his son or kowtow to the fundie baggers? It will be interesting to see.

we can do it

(12,189 posts)
9. ........and he probably used taxpayer funds to do so while calling for austerity.
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 02:24 PM
Mar 2013

self serving prick.

Zen Democrat

(5,901 posts)
6. It's just as Rachel stated on Real Time last night ...
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 12:09 PM
Mar 2013

Portman's son came out to him in 2011, but he kept quiet all through 2012 because he was on the short list for VP, and then up for a big cabinet post if Romney won. So, after losing out on his hopes and dreams, he announces that he stands with his son. Too little, too late for any accolades.While I'm happy that he's supportive now, no high praise for him, please. He's another self-serving Reep.

nolabear

(41,986 posts)
10. So no one ever gets forgiven? That makes change impossible.
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 02:37 PM
Mar 2013

If someone can never screw up and then be welcomed when they change, they have to have that better attitude in isolation and can't use it for good.

we can do it

(12,189 posts)
11. Only someone who deserves it not this weasel (see post 6. his son came out to him in 2011)
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 02:47 PM
Mar 2013

Portman's son came out to him in 2011, but he kept quiet all through 2012- but now that the tide seems to be turning with young repubs and the election of 2012 is past NOW he's ok with it. Sorry no pass for this prick, people like him have cast us in Ohio as second class citizens UNTIL it hits home and now he's sorry? fuck him he deserves nothing from me.)

Cha

(297,304 posts)
12. Portman continued voting anti-gay long after his son came out..
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 03:32 PM
Mar 2013
No one's hiding anything, but Will came out to his parents two years ago. Portman's voting record on issues impacting the LGBT community is extremely homophobic. He almost always votes against equality. Since his son came out, the Senate took up several bills important to the gay community. For example, on April 26 last year, Portman voted for an amendment to strip provisions designed to protect American Indians, immigrants and members of the LGBT community in an anti-domestic violence bill.

More recently-- last June-- he voted to keep a GOP filibuster going against confirming Mari Carmen Aponte as Ambassador to El Salvador. Ms. Carmen isn't a lesbian but right-wing sociopath Jim DeMint claimed an article she once wrote was pro-gay and that that disqualified her from being Ambassador. Portman went along with DeMint, although 7 other Republicans crossed the aisle, shut down DeMint's insane filibuster (62-37 and subsequently confirmed her. Even cowering closet case Lindsey Graham voted to shut down the filibuster. So did die-hard homophobe Marco Rubio. Portman has a zero rating by ProgressivePunch on his voting record on roll calls crucial to the LGBT community.
http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2013/03/rob-portman-continued-voting-very-anti.html?showComment=1363388838284

Finally now a strike of conscience?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sorry, but I can't write ...