Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 08:20 AM Mar 2013

Wall Street will get away with massive wave of criminality of 2008 - Statute of Limitations

Unless something happens in the next few weeks, the vast majority of crimes committed by Wall Street bankers in the 2008 meltdown will go unpunished. The Statute of Limitations for these crimes is 5 years and the Supreme Court recently ruled that the government can only bring charges 5 years from the date of the crime rather than the 5 years from the date of the discovery of the crime.

Don't pay your taxes? No SOL for that crime. They can prosecute you at any time in the future.

Here is a depressing article that spells out why Wall Street bankers will get away with their crimes.
*******************************************

In a setback for the government’s ability to prosecute crimes tied to the 2008 financial crisis, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the Securities and Exchange Commission can’t extend the time limit for seeking penalties in civil fraud cases.

The unanimous decision largely ensures no new civil fraud charges will come out of the crisis, now that five-year statute of limitations for such cases has nearly expired.

The case, Gabelli v. SEC, involved Marc Gabelli, a portfolio manager, and Bruce Alpert, chief operating officer at the investment firm Gabelli Funds, LLC. According to the government, between 1999 and 2002, Gabelli and Alpert allowed a client to engage in an improper trading technique known as market timing. The strategy allows investors to make frequent short-term trades at the expense of other clients in a mutual fund. The SEC launched an investigation in 2003, but did not file a complaint until 2008.

At issue in the case was when should the clock start ticking for civil fraud cases: Should it begin when the alleged crime actually occurs, or when the crime is discovered? The defendants argued that the SEC waited too long to bring charges, but in August, a lower court decided in favor of the SEC, ruling that time runs out five years after the agency discovers — or could have reasonably been expected to discover — fraud.

Read More at:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/business-economy-financial-crisis/untouchables/supreme-court-ruling-a-blow-for-future-financial-crisis-cases/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wall Street will get away with massive wave of criminality of 2008 - Statute of Limitations (Original Post) Vinnie From Indy Mar 2013 OP
K&R woo me with science Sep 2013 #1
kick woo me with science Sep 2013 #2
The ridiculousness of the inherent duty to investigate an undiscovered crime Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2013 #3

Dark n Stormy Knight

(9,760 posts)
3. The ridiculousness of the inherent duty to investigate an undiscovered crime
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 01:10 AM
Dec 2013

is absurd. And the fact that the laws favor the well-funded criminal is infuriating.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wall Street will get away...