Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 05:56 AM Mar 2013

JPMorgan bullied bank regulators, report says

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/jpmorgan-bullied-bank-regulators-documents-and-testimony-show/2013/03/15/bb189da0-8d9f-11e2-9838-d62f083ba93f_story.html


Andrew Harrer/BLOOMBERG - Ina Drew, former chief investment officer with JPMorgan Chase, arrives to a Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations hearing. JPMorgan Chase compensated chief investment office traders in a way that encouraged risk-taking before the unit amassed losses exceeding $6.2 billion, a Senate committee said.

When bank regulators wanted daily profit and loss statements from JPMorgan Chase’s investment division, the bank initially refused.

When examiners issued recommendations the bank didn’t like, executives yelled and called the federal officials “stupid.”

At one point, the top brass at the prestigious bank ambushed a junior bank examiner, becoming “loud and combative” when he disclosed disputed results of an exam.

Those incidents are part of a rare and detailed look into the interactions between Washington regulators and Wall Street, described in congressional testimonies Friday and a Senate report on a massive trading loss at JPMorgan.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
JPMorgan bullied bank regulators, report says (Original Post) xchrom Mar 2013 OP
Kick & Rec. n/t. apocalypsehow Mar 2013 #1
JP Morgan's Jamie Dimon showed too much hubris and too little humility xchrom Mar 2013 #2
Thank you for the link. a very readable account of the Senate hearing snappyturtle Mar 2013 #3
Clarence Darrow the great American Lawyer said Ichingcarpenter Mar 2013 #4
It's called deregulation! GoldenOldie Mar 2013 #5
We'll learn when banks are no longer allowed to lobby the federal government perdita9 Mar 2013 #7
This woman is either incompetent or a criminal perdita9 Mar 2013 #6
she is a competent criminal who was "just following orders" dixiegrrrrl Mar 2013 #8
K&R KoKo Mar 2013 #9

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
2. JP Morgan's Jamie Dimon showed too much hubris and too little humility
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 06:04 AM
Mar 2013
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/15/jp-morgan-jamie-dimon-heidi-moore


You could tell the exact moment when Ina Drew decided she had nothing left to lose.

Drew, who ran JP Morgan's $350bn investment office, testified in front of the Senate today about the infamous London Whale trading debacle that racked up $6.2bn in losses for JP Morgan last year. She began her testimony by recounting her decades at JP Morgan "through seven mergers," talked about managing her job and her kids in a search for work-life balance, and gave credit to the "great CEOs" she had worked under, including current chief executive Jamie Dimon.

But Drew did not step up to take responsibility herself. She talked of trusting her deputies. She insisted that JP Morgan had provided its regulators with a daily account of the profits and losses in the bank's investment office – despite Senate documentation to the contrary and the testimony of a regulator who later directly said she was wrong, and that the bank only provided the daily account after the whole debacle blew up in May. When Drew was asked if she knew one key and obvious fact – whether JP Morgan had skipped a crucial yearly check on its trading limits – she demurred that she couldn't recall.

Drew, however, was one of the villains in the bank's own account of what went wrong, and you could see the pressure building up in her mind as she declined to answer, paused, or claimed lack of recall. She ran the office that racked up the losses, and according to the Senate report, she applauded traders for risky bets on American Airlines.

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
3. Thank you for the link. a very readable account of the Senate hearing
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 06:49 AM
Mar 2013

especially of the revelations. I especially enjoyed reading Ina Drew saying ol' Jamie Dimon knew what was really going on in her office.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
4. Clarence Darrow the great American Lawyer said
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 07:03 AM
Mar 2013

The law does not pretend to punish everything that is dishonest. That would seriously interfere with business.





A criminal is a person with predatory instincts who has not sufficient capital to form a corporation.



GoldenOldie

(1,540 posts)
5. It's called deregulation!
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 07:55 AM
Mar 2013

I worked in the banking industry during the late 50's, 60's and early 70's, when Federal Auditors had the authority to immediately shut the doors of any bank for failing to allow access to any and all records of the bank.

Strict banking regulations were enacted after the stock market crash and bank failures during the late 1920's. NOt only were banks being audited by Federal Regulators but the individual Banks established their own BOard of Directors which employed their own Internal Private Audtors which would catch any problems before a Federal audit. I remember we'll, many a President/Manager who trembled when looking up and finding an auditor looking back and realizing he had just given a customer a "short term" loan to cover an insufficient check. No matter what the mount, this was considered illegal, if the bank held no collateral for the loan, even if the loan was for only 24hrs. Minor infractions were grounds for immediate dismissal and Findings of repeated or bigger infractions were cause to immediately close the doors of the bank.

If these regulations had sill been in place, the latest disaster of the housing market collapse, bank failures , etc., etc., would not have happened. Will we never learn?

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
8. she is a competent criminal who was "just following orders"
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 10:11 AM
Mar 2013

I can hardly wait for the book to come out.
seriously.
some of the best reading are the stories of the "too big to fail" who tripped over their own hubris.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»JPMorgan bullied bank reg...