Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,025 posts)
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 03:43 AM Feb 2012

Drunk drivers: Congress gets behind breath-test ignition devices

An effort to get more states to require convicted drunk drivers to test their breath for alcohol before they can start their cars is gaining support in Congress.

A House transportation bill unveiled Tuesday would offer additional highway funds to states that require ignition interlock devices for DUI offenders. A similar measure is expected to come before the Senate.

Fifteen states require all convicted drunk drivers, including first-time offenders, to use the devices, according to Mothers Against Drunk Driving, which has promoted use of the devices. The ignition interlock prevents a driver from starting the engine if his or her blood-alcohol content exceeds a preset limit.

In a pilot project that runs through 2016, DUI offenders in Los Angeles County and three other California counties were required to install the devices in their cars beginning in 2010.

full: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nationnow/2012/01/bill-to-target-drunk-drivers-gains-support-but-other-battles-lay-ahead-over-next-roads-measure-.html

Before you cry out "NANNY STATE!" (even some on the left would do so) realise: we have human lives at stake!

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Drunk drivers: Congress gets behind breath-test ignition devices (Original Post) alp227 Feb 2012 OP
we should just inject anyone who has purchased alcohol with a spybot that reports back Tunkamerica Feb 2012 #1
Like Private Prisons, Red Light Cameras and even Parking Meter Contracts, Morning Dew Feb 2012 #2
The restaurant lobby will be all over this shit, and it is a slippery slope. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #3
I fail to see how the ignition interlock COLGATE4 Feb 2012 #4

Tunkamerica

(4,444 posts)
1. we should just inject anyone who has purchased alcohol with a spybot that reports back
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 04:27 AM
Feb 2012

to central command about the subject's activities. How could that be abused?


In truth, I knew one of the first 100 or so to get the interlock devices on their car in NC in the early 2000's. It was ridiculously dangerous for her because of having to stop the car on deserted stretches of highway (between Raleigh and Western NC), perform a complex routine of on punches and off punches between three separate buttons punctuated with long breaths, and if she failed three times she was stranded wherever she was, safe or not until she could get a tow truck to tow her somewhere where the interlock device could be reset. That didn't even take into account the false positives she had to pay hundreds of dollars for or the fact that vinegar on a subway sandwich or mouthwash would set the thing off.

It seemed a punishment in excess of the crime (in which no one was hurt, no property was damaged, and she was barely 21) that she had to pay for in dollars, safety, and humiliation (not to mention job opportunities) for years and years.

Drunk driving is wrong and I don't do it, but seeing what she had to go through turned me against these devices early on.

Morning Dew

(6,539 posts)
2. Like Private Prisons, Red Light Cameras and even Parking Meter Contracts,
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 04:37 AM
Feb 2012

these are increasingly giveaways to private contractors.

States shouldn't be in the business of creating private profits for public safety issues. It allows private business to prey on citizens.

If the state is interested enough to enforce its laws and penalize lawbreaking citizens, it should be interested enough to protect those citizens from for-profit vultures.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
3. The restaurant lobby will be all over this shit, and it is a slippery slope.
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 11:15 AM
Feb 2012

You'll fail a breath test if you take one shot or gargle with any mouthwash and get in your car. Your BAC will not be above .08 at any time, but unless you flush your mouth with water you'll have enough residue in your mouth to create the vapors that will register above .08. A blood test will show otherwise. It's one thing to be inconvenienced to have to go to the hospital for a blood test to prove you are within range and quite another to have your car say "FUCK YOU!" and refuse to start - like when you just gargled and have to leave for work.

This isn't about DUI offenders. It's the foot in the door for a federal mandate to install it on ALL cars. Somebody's going to make a shitload of money out of this and we'll end up paying the bill in the long run. Besides, it won't be on the market long before someone starts making simple air balloon devices that defeat the system and then Congress will spend all of its time arguing over a bill to ban those and not get anything done. Okay, so that last part might be a good thing.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
4. I fail to see how the ignition interlock
Wed Feb 1, 2012, 12:15 PM
Feb 2012

system triggered by breath works for anyone except the solitary drunk - otherwise, it's "hey Buddy, go start my car for me - I'm hammered".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Drunk drivers: Congress g...