Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGay Couples Could See Windfalls From (SCOTUS) Court Action
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/gay-couples-windfalls-court-action-18693302For Mina Meyer and Sharon Raphael, two women in their 70s who fell in love more than four decades ago and have been married for more than four years, the U.S. Supreme Court's pending consideration of a law that prohibits the federal government from recognizing unions like theirs is about more than civil rights. It's about buying a new roof for their California home, replacing their 2005 Toyota Camry, and ensuring Meyer doesn't take a financial hit if Raphael dies first.
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments this month in a challenge to a provision of the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, that denies legally married gay and lesbian couples federal benefits available to heterosexual married couples, including tax and Social Security benefits. A decision is not expected until the end of June, but accountants and tax attorneys anticipating the 18-year-old law's demise are already encouraging same-sex couples like Raphael and Meyer to seek prospective tax refunds, back retirement payments and other spousal subsidies they may have been denied.
It is unclear how the justices might rule, but the Obama administration and former President Bill Clinton, who signed the act into law, have urged the court to overturn it on grounds that it violates the civil rights of gay Americans. DOMA supporters, including House Republicans led by Speaker John Boehner, argue that Congress not the court should decide as public opinion for same-sex marriage grows. Other conservative groups argue that spousal benefits should be reserved only for couples of the opposite sex.
Part of the urgency for couples to act stems from deadlines established under the U.S. tax code, which gives taxpayers three years to file protective claims for income and estate tax refunds. Same-sex couples or surviving spouses who were legally married before or during 2009 would therefore have until April 15 of this year to submit amended returns claiming overpayments on income for that tax year, said Vickie Henry, a senior staff attorney at Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1066 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gay Couples Could See Windfalls From (SCOTUS) Court Action (Original Post)
steve2470
Mar 2013
OP
Helen Reddy
(998 posts)1. I hope so! n/t
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)2. Recognizing that the phrase comes from the link, not the OP,
I'm a bit bummed at using the term "windfall' to describe having the same economic rights as everyone else!
steve2470
(37,457 posts)3. agreed, bad title for article nt
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)6. I wanted to make sure you weren't responsible for the title!
steve2470
(37,457 posts)7. yes, definitely not :) nt
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)8. I should ahve said - made sure that you weren't
held responsible for the title.
MineralMan
(146,338 posts)4. 'Windfalls' is a pretty odd way to describe
getting the same rights and opportunities as everyone else, it seems to me.
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)5. I think the truth of why Republicans oppose
gay marriage is economics. They can claim it is about religion and morals but Republicans aren't particularly moral, ignore religion when it suits them, and are most often motivated by money.
What a travesty that DOMA even exists. Gay couples should be guaranteed all of the same rights and privileges are heterosexual couples.