General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMarissa Mayer under fire as she brings baby to personal nursery that she built next to her office
Marissa Mayer under fire as she brings baby to personal nursery that she built next to her office after telling Yahoo! employees they can no longer work from homeYahoo CEO Marissa Mayer built a nursery in her office so she could bring her baby to work, which has angered some stay-at-home employees following her demand that all remote workers report back to the office.
The former Google Inc. executive took the demanding top job at Yahoo! when she was five months pregnant and stirred up controversy when she took only two weeks of maternity leave after giving birth last fall. But at her own expense, Mayer built a nursery adjacent to her office to be closer to her son.
'I wonder what would happen if my wife brought our kids and nanny to work and set em up in the cube next door?' the husband of one remote-working Yahoo employee asked in an interview with AllThingsD's Kara Swisher.
Many employees are upset because they don't have the money or clout to build their own nurseries at work. And many assume Mayer has a whole team of people, from nannies to cooks and cleaners, helping her raise her son - after all, she does have a $5 million penthouse atop the Four Seasons hotel in San Francisco in addition to her $5.2 million 5-bedroom home in Palo Alto.
More: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2284828/Marissa-Mayer-brings-baby-personal-nursery-built-office-telling-Yahoo-employees-longer-work-home.html
A continuation of this article:
Female Yahoo! CEO Kills Work from Home Option? Why Americans Need a More Flexible Workplace
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022429248
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)I recall reading that somewhere...would explain her "I can do what I want but phuck you" sort of attitude.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)I read that somewhere.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Unreal - google it. Worth searching for.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)OhioChick
(23,218 posts)I did find a quote of hers when asked to state her priorities:
"God, family and Yahooin that order."
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Tanuki
(14,918 posts)and worked at Google from the time she was 20 until she went to Yahoo. It's also implausible that the SBC would have a female in such a high position. Maybe you dreamed it, Tatum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marissa_Mayer
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Gidney N Cloyd
(19,840 posts)ovaries?
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)Swear to god it is a disease we need to cure.
And I know that it is the norm nowadays for the top execs to make obscene amounts of money, but I'm old enough to remember when it wasn't this way. When the CEO wasn't like royalty. We are a really screwed up society.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)People with no critical thinking skills think their shit doesn't stink when they get money. This fucking Yahoo is one of them.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...when I was the mother of young children and worked full time for a software company... I remember asking why the company could not provide an onsite daycare center? I would have willingly paid for the service, I was not looking for a handout, but there were others in the same situation and we all paid for daycare for our young children anyway.
If the company had provided the service onsite, it would have alleviated many difficulties, for them and for us. For one thing, no more rushing home to pick up the kids on time from their daycare provider. For another thing, we could look in on our children during lunch break. Also the security of knowing the children were right there, close to hand, and knowing that we could be more closely involved with the care they were receiving.
It seems to me that Mayer could offer to do that.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)And full of shit.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)had free?/cheap onsite daycare
a basketball court/gym
a nap-room
onsite French Restaurant (super cheap and great food)
and many more amenities
they also had a LONG list of prospective employees..no one ever quit
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)Response to OhioChick (Original post)
Post removed
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)and the time zones of the participants
Babies DO sleep...and the avoidance of commuting adds at LEAST 2 hours (for many people) a day of formerly wasted time to a schedule
It's a power-trip for many bosses,. They like the "Overseer" approach to Labor/mgmt.
riqster
(13,986 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)company name - yahoo. I guess everyone should just drop their kids off at her personal daycare.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)'I wonder what would happen if my wife brought our kids and nanny to work and set em up in the cube next door?'
A person worried about spending time with their kids... but not actually DOING it...
sP
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)they've got a nanny why would they need to worry about where she sets up shop.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)I see either a reversal in the policy or that she won't be in charge nearly as long she thinks she will be.
Wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if the lawyers aren't already lining up lawsuits.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)This is a modern world and I don't understand why children seemed to be shoved off. Parents do better knowning their children are in a safe environment. We need to be more like europe when it comes to child care. America is going back wards.
Initech
(100,080 posts)"New rule: if you get to bring your baby to work, I get to bring a Mexican mariachi band. The difference is I pay the mariachis $20 and they go away and annoy someone else."
So stay at home moms have to report to work, the CEO gets a private nursery next to her office. Our priorities are really fucked up.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)....Business analysts typically don't like to hear that a company is laying off workers, so some companies really try to disguise what they're doing.
Some of the hundreds of Yahoo employees currently working at home will find other work-at-home jobs. The overall loss of employees will reduce the Yahoo workforce, improve profits, and make the bottom line something the shareholders will generally like.
On the flip side, Yahoo will be losing a ton of work experience and develop even more negative PR than they have now. Additionally, Yahoo will have to replace some of those people, but they will be paying more in terms of office supplies, furniture, PCs, comm devices, benefits, and all other things that fall under the broad umbrella of overhead.
Yahoo may find their savings from losing employees is offset by the expenditures of making people work at the Yahoo facilities. Time will tell.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)I would say there's a good chance that's what's going on here.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)this is actually just a shrewd business move... it will be effective.
sP
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)The private nursery thing is more than a little clueless, but the decision to change Yahoo's work-at-home policy seems to have been necessary. From everything one hears, the policy was being badly abused, with far too many people getting very little accomplished and being so out of touch that people in their own departments had no idea they even worked for Yahoo. Yahoo is known in the tech field for having a bloated, lazy management layer, and one secret to successful work-at-home programs is to have active, involved managers. Not really to "slave drive" home workers, but just to stay in touch and involved with what they're doing and to assure that at least a reasonable level of work is actually getting done.
AndyA
(16,993 posts)and can't understand why some employees are unhappy. Let them eat cake!
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)of the problems other women have.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)She should take this as an opportunity to reflect on how life is for families of women who aren't CEOs.
And get to work changing it, where she can.
And I'll ask the same question I always ask when the topic of Marissa Mayer comes up, which is, what the fuck is yahoo's business model, anyway?
I'm surprised they're still afloat.
Tallulah
(209 posts)interviewing for a job at the Fruit of the Loom plant many years ago and being asked if I had kids.
Before I had the chance to even answer I was told having no babysitter, having a sick child, was not an excuse to be absent from work.
Working hours were from 7 am to 5 pm and half a day on Saturday.
The place employed 3000 women. Childcare was not their problem.
Many women were either let go or quit because of their rule. Then the SOBs moved to Mexico and devastated the town forever.
To this day I refuse to buy Fruit of the Loom anything.
Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer should be ashamed of herself.