Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKansas Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Same-Sex Adoption
On Friday, the Kansas Supreme Court issued a ruling protecting the rights of same-sex couples to both be recognized as the legal parents of the children they are raising together. The case involved two women, Marci Frazier and Kelly Goudschaal, who had been raising children together, but then faced a custody dispute after they separated. The Court ruled that the coparenting contract the couple had signed is valid and should be recognized, because their children are better off having two parents than just one:To summarize, the coparenting agreement before us cannot be construed as a prohibited sale of the children because the biological mother retains her parental duties and responsibilities. The agreement is not injurious to the public because it provides the children with the resources of two persons, rather than leaving them as the fatherless children of an artificially inseminated mother. No societal interest has been harmed; no mischief has been done. Like the contract in Shirk, the coparenting agreement here contains no element of immorality or illegality and did not violate public policy, but rather the contract was for the advantage and welfare of the child[ren].
The decision remands the case back to the district court with this guidance to work out the details for the couple.
The conclusion in this case is simple and poignant: a childs parents are the people that have legally committed to caring for them, not necessarily who they are biologically connected to. Interestingly, the justices do not even address the question of same-sex marriage, recognizing that protecting the interests of children is what takes priority. In this case, the children deserve to enjoy the continued support of both of their moms, and nothing in Kansas law prevents that.
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2013/02/25/1633621/kansas-supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-same-sex-adoption/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1497 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kansas Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Same-Sex Adoption (Original Post)
UrbScotty
Feb 2013
OP
Skittles
(153,169 posts)1. “the contract was for the advantage and welfare of the child.”
CORRECT
JeffHead
(1,186 posts)2. I imagine the whole Phelps family are doing this...
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)3. Couldn't think of a better group of misfits than the Phelps!
Tagish_Charlie
(85 posts)4. Westboro hell!
Supreme Mullah, Taliban Sam, Ruler of Brownbackistan has to be drooling in his shoes over this one
rurallib
(62,423 posts)6. brownback also!
xchrom
(108,903 posts)5. Du rec. Nt
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)7. Heather has two mommies... plus a damn good lawyer.
The legal reasoning is clear, but I imagine the lawyer had to work some to help the judges get past the fact that it was a same-sex couple.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)8. Well, this is one of maybe two times a year Kansas is right about something
Just like a stopped clock.