Teahadist: "You have the right to kill any representative of this government" to protect your guns

[LuckyTheDog]

The Tea Party is becoming crazier and more rage driven. Here is a good example of why I say that:

If they come for our guns then it is our constitutional right to put them six feet under. You have the right to kill any representative of this government who tries to tread on your liberty. I am thinking about self-defense and not talking about inciting a revolution. Re-read Jefferson’s quote. He talks about a “last resort.” I am not trying to start a Revolt, I am talking about self-defense. If the day for Revolution comes, when no peaceful options exist, we may have to talk about that as well. None of us wants to think about that, but please understand that a majority can not take away your rights as an American citizen. Only you can choose to give up your rights.

<snip>

I just wrote what every believer in the constitution wants to say, and what every constitutional blogger needs to write. The truth of the matter is that this type of speech is viewed as dangerous and radical or subversive, and it could gain me a world of trouble that I do not want. It is also the truth. To make myself clear I will tell you again. If they come for your guns it is your right to use those guns against them and to kill them. You are protected by our constitution.

Source: http://www.teapartyperspective.com/2013/01/11/if-they-come-for-your-guns-do-you-have-a-responsibility-to-fight/

[Turbineguy]

1. Stochastic terrorism.

Looking for some poor fool to carry out his directive.

[Initech]

2. Try it once I dare you.

We should stop electing these dipshits and start branding them enemies of the state. The shit they are suggesting is akin to treason.

[Zoeisright]

3. Report that fucker to the FBI.

https://tips.fbi.gov/

[MrSlayer]

4. Yeah because people that try to fight the government never lose.

Ruby Ridge, Waco, that asshole cop last week. Go for it numbnuts.

[Initech]

6. Yup fighting the government is like betting against the house. The house always wins.

[pinboy3niner]

5. Forget alternatives--like hiding one's guns with a friend--for those inclined to be paranoid

Posting a "last resort" disclaimer rings hollow when killing is advocated as the first resort.

[ZombieHorde]

7. Seems to me the only freedom they truly care about

concerns guns.

[jambo101]

8. For a few $K you could implement your own drone for the task.

[link:

|

[jmowreader]

9. Well...they could try

Apparently the government is going to send one unarmed agent to collect your guns...and not a whole platoon of soldiers locked and loaded and aiming at your front door.

[EastKYLiberal]

10. Argh.

We need a military task force assembled to kick down the door of anybody advocating for armed revolution.

[Robb]

12. Oh, see, now you had us going for a second.

But now you've played it too hard.

[randome]

11. There is no Tea Party.

There are only disparate groups of angry people with no leaders except in very few and limited circumstances, no sense of coordination and little if any communication between them.

All these angry people latch onto the term. Kind of like Anonymous and Occupy. I don't say that to start a separate dispute with anyone but I see the same lack of organizational skills in evidence. I think all of it is related.

[LuckyTheDog]

13. More from Dean Garrison

http://dcclothesline.com/author/DeanGarrison/

He is a real nut.