Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,066 posts)
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 09:59 PM Feb 2013

WHITEHOUSE urges Supreme Court to strike down Defense of Marriage Act

http://www.estergoldberg.com/views_from_a_broad/2013/02/breaking-news-whitehouse-urges-supreme-court-to-strike-down-defense-of-marriage-act.html

BREAKING NEWS: WHITEHOUSE urges Supreme Court to strike down Defense of Marriage Act

The Obama administration on Friday urged the Supreme Court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act.



By forcing a federal definition of “spouse” and “marriage,” the administration argued in a brief, DOMA “violates the fundamental constitutional guarantee of equal protection. The law denies to tens of thousands of same-sex couples who are legally married under state law an array of important federal benefits that are available to legally married opposite-sex couples.”

The Obama administration has been urging courts to strike down DOMA for two years. Friday was the deadline to file briefs in the challenge to the 1996 law, scheduled to be heard March 27.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WHITEHOUSE urges Supreme Court to strike down Defense of Marriage Act (Original Post) babylonsister Feb 2013 OP
It must NOT be a "states' rights" issue, because a couple that is married in one state patrice Feb 2013 #1
Apparently, I quipped correctly. Robb Feb 2013 #2

patrice

(47,992 posts)
1. It must NOT be a "states' rights" issue, because a couple that is married in one state
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 10:46 PM
Feb 2013

can have property and tax consequences, amongst other legal issues in another state in which their marriage is not recognized if one or the other of them has somekind of financial or other legal involvement there.

DOMA must be overturned in order to prevent the creation of another legally permanent under-class.

NOT! on my watch!

Robb

(39,665 posts)
2. Apparently, I quipped correctly.
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 10:53 PM
Feb 2013

Hyper-pan-dimensional-chess, with lasers, indeed. Although grantcart's analysis on that old thread is the astutest of them all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WHITEHOUSE urges Supreme ...