General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama administration asks Supreme Court to strike down Defense of Marriage Act
by Kaili Joy Gray
This is a very welcome Friday news dump:
The Obama administration urged the Supreme Court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act's prohibition on recognition of same-sex couples' marriages in a Friday filing, arguing that laws that target gay people should face additional scrutiny by courts reviewing them.
You can read the full brief here.
Equality is coming, no matter how many marches the bigots organize. And it's certainly nice to see the White House take a strong stand to be on the right side of history. You can help make it a reality in Oregon too, by donating to Oregon United for Marriage.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/02/22/1189180/-Obama-administration-asks-Supreme-Courts-to-strike-down-Defense-of-Marriage-Act
Full brief: http://www.scribd.com/doc/126830274/US-Merits-Brief-Windsor
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)putitinD
(1,551 posts)Cha
(297,275 posts)ProSense!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
sheshe2
(83,785 posts)iandhr
(6,852 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
spanone
(135,841 posts)one_voice
(20,043 posts)Where are all the negative nellies?
15 fucking threads on the same negative shit, not one comment here.
jazzimov
(1,456 posts)one_voice
(20,043 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)I am familiar with the Estate of Thea Spyer case, but is this filing proactive or reactive - basically, is this the government stepping in before SCOTUS hears the case or in response to the fact that it has been accepted for hearing?
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)It's the filing of what is called an amicus brief, "amicus" being related to the latin word for friend.
The brief is considered by the Supreme Court when they evaluate the two LGBT marriage cases before the SCOTUS this session. The justices can completely disregard it if they choose, or put whatever weight they want to what the administration's brief says.
Could it make the difference in one or two swing justices minds? It might. But it might not. Still, in terms of a case like these going before the SCOTUS, not much else can be done by the administration. They have already decided not to defend DOMA in these cases.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)So this brief IS proactive, speaking to the administrations desire on the outcome. Hopefully, I understood that.
Last I heard, wasn't the GOP House caucus stepping up to defend DOMA because the administration won't - or do I have that twisted as well? Sorry - been VERY busy the last few months and am really out of touch with how this case, the MA case and Prop 8 are progressing. Thanks for helping.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)are a motley crue of pro Proposition 8 groups who the SCOTUS may even decide right off the bat do not have standing. If anyone is defending prop 8, it should be the government of the state of California. The Governor and state attorney general's office refuse to defend Prop 8 because they are Democrats who are against prop 8.
If the SCOTUS decides that the group defending prop 8 do not have standing, that case could be over before real arguments begin with the result being Prop 8 is permanently shot down.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Wasn't aware of that development. I like!
Thanks Steven!
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)RudynJack
(1,044 posts)I didn't expect it, but President Obama has been a great proponent of gay rights. I'm very pleased.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Just in case you prefer that format.
http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/US-merits-brief-Windsor-2-22-12.pdf
Great news. He hit every point possible. It's a very good amicus brief. And how the hell is amicus not in our dictionary?