Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"White House pushing tax hikes, spending cuts to avoid sequester"
White House pushing tax hikes, spending cuts to avoid sequesterBy Zachary A. Goldfarb at the Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/white-house-pushing-tax-hikes-spending-cuts-to-avoid-sequester/2013/02/22/aa4f9ab0-7ca5-11e2-82e8-61a46c2cde3d_story.html?hpid=z1
"SNIP....................................................
The White House is promoting a $1.8 trillion package of spending cuts and tax hikes as the best approach to replace deep reductions in domestic and defense spending set to begin next week even as Republicans dismiss the proposal as not serious.
With barely more than a week until the deep cuts, known as the sequester, take effect, President Obama and his advisers this week maintained that a deficit reduction plan he put on the table in December amid negotiations over the fiscal cliff should still be considered by Congress as a way to avoid another fiscal crisis. Obama spoke with House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Thursday, but no progress was reported.
Obama originally made the offer to Boehner in December negotiations, which ultimately fell apart. The presidents plan the details of which were known in December but were reiterated on the White House Web site on Thursday would consist of $200 billion in cuts to domestic and defense programs; $400 billion in reductions in health spending, including Medicare; $200 billion in cuts to other mandatory spending, such as farm subsidies; and $130 billion in savings achieved through a new cost-of-living formula that would slow spending on federal programs, including Social Security. The presidents plan would also raise $680 billion in fresh tax revenue, by limiting tax breaks for the wealthy, closing corporate loopholes and changing the cost-of-living formula that also determines tax brackets.
Combined with lower interest costs as a result of the reduced federal borrowing, the White House said this week that Obamas proposal would achieve $1.8 trillion in deficit reduction over 10 years. That would come on top of $2.5 trillion in deficit reduction already achieved in deals between Congress and the president.
......................................................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 825 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"White House pushing tax hikes, spending cuts to avoid sequester" (Original Post)
applegrove
Feb 2013
OP
The rich won't feel a thing. The elderly and most vulnerable will be devastated.
forestpath
Feb 2013
#3
mucifer
(23,548 posts)1. Oy vey that chained cpi thing. But, I do like that tax the wealth part.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)2. Still pushing chained CPI. I knew he couldn't wait to trot it out again.
forestpath
(3,102 posts)3. The rich won't feel a thing. The elderly and most vulnerable will be devastated.
That's Obama's idea of "balance."
djean111
(14,255 posts)4. Oh look!
A line in my sand.
So, do we stop hearing how Obama would never actually do that, and start hearing how the chained CPI is a GOOD thing?
My hair is not on fire, I am too cynical for that.
Anyway, not like Obama needs any votes or base or anything, now.