General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPalast newsletter: The Pig in the XL Pipeline
In my email:
Insider reveals concealed "error" in pipeline safety equipment that could blow away the GOP's XL pipe dream
by Greg Palast
"They threatened me. Last night I got a call and they threatened me. If I talked."
"Pig Man #2," a pipeline industry insider, had a good reason to be afraid. He was about to blow the whistle on a fraud, information that could blow away the XL Keystone Pipeline project.
His information: The software for the crucial piece of pipeline safety equipment, the "Smart PIG," has a flaw known to the industry but concealed from regulators.
The flaw allows cracks, leaks and corrosion to go undetected - and that saves the industry billions of dollars in pipe replacements. But there's a catch. Pipes with cracks and leaks can explode - and kill.
Federal law requires the oil and gas industry to run a PIG, a Pipeline Inspection Gauge, through big oil and gas pipelines. The robot porker, tethered to a GPS, beeps and boops as it rolls through, electronically squealing when it finds dangers.
But whistleblowers told us at Channel 4 Dispatches (the "60 Minutes" of Britain) that the software is deliberately calibrated to ignore or minimize deadly problems. They know because they themselves worked on the software design team.
This week, President Obama refused to issue a permit for the Keystone XL Pipeline, but invited its owner, Trans-Canada, to re-apply. The GOP has gone wild over Obama's hesitation, screeching that slowing the Canada-to-Houston pipe for a full safety review is a jobs killer.
But it's the Pipeline that's the killer. Here's what Pig Man #2 told me, on camera, his face in shadow:
When his team found the life-threatening flaw in the program, they immediately created a software patch to fix it. But then their supervisor ordered them to bury the fix and conceal the problem.
With the PIG calibrated to the danger sensitivity required by law, oil and gas companies would have to dig up, inspect and replace pipe at a cost of millions per mile. That's not what the oil companies wanted from their contractor that designed the PIG program.
The programmers' bosses took no chances. "We had to sign nondisclosure agreements." They were required to conceal "any problems of this sort or the nature of the software we worked." It could not "be made public at all. Under threat of lawsuit." Nice.
With the error left in place, he said, "People die."
Pig Man #2 was shaking a bit when he said it. On September 9, 2010, a gas pipeline exploded, incinerating 13-year-old Janessa Greig, her mom and six others.
A PIG - an honest PIG - would have caught the bad welds in the old pipe.
Trans-Canada says that Keystone XL won't contaminate the Ogallala Aquifer, the Plains states' crucial water source. Keystone's permit application boasts that we can rely on XL's "full pigging capability."
Sure. Last summer, an ExxonMobil pipeline burst and poisoned parts of the Yellowstone River - only months after it had been "pigged."
The danger of a muzzled PIG goes beyond Keystone XL. New gas fields opened by hydraulic fracking will require over 100,000 miles of new transmission pipe.
This week, Newt Gingrich called Obama's temporary block on the XL Pipeline, "stunningly stupid"; and Mitt Romney said Obama's decision threatened America's "energy independence." (Mitt, the oil is from, uh, Canada.)
But the real question is, can we trust these pigs? And not just the ones in the pipeline.
****
Greg Palast, whose reports can be seen on BBC Television Newsnight, is the author of the New York Times bestsellers, "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy" and "Armed Madhouse." His latest book, Vultures' Picnic, includes Palast's investigation of the Deepwater Horizon explosion, vulture capitalism, and "the pig in the pipeline."
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Richardo
(38,391 posts)I thought Palast was a better writer than that.
niyad
(113,552 posts)Richardo
(38,391 posts)...when it finds dangers. "
Horrible. Fox and Friends horrible.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)It makes his books and reports both informative and fun. It also helps offset the inevitable anger the stories inspire
niyad
(113,552 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)colorful, with his wording.
Richardo
(38,391 posts)think
(11,641 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,699 posts)I am appalled and horrified, but perhaps not surprisingly, NOT surprised.
To ensure that profits keep coming, ANY corner has been and will be cut.
Despicable.
niyad
(113,552 posts)greg was talking about this during a speech in SF (I think) about his book "vultures' picnic"
there is nothing, apparently, that the oil companies won't do to insure their obscene profits.
starroute
(12,977 posts)Palast has been after the energy industry for decades -- and the stories he has to tell just get deeper and dirtier.
Yes, his style can be overly cinematic at times, but he's earned the right to it. There's blood on every page of that book.
niyad
(113,552 posts)one that just got a contract for eight new plants here?
starroute
(12,977 posts)The book is half gripping and half dismaying, so I've been going through it kind of slowly.
niyad
(113,552 posts)and too sick to continue.
and we notice that the msm does not cover this at all.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)he does.
T S Justly
(884 posts)AdHocSolver
(2,561 posts)Software developed on the same principles as the software developed for paperless electronic voting machines.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)Please be careful Mr. Palast. We love you!