General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMichael Bloomberg vetoes bill banning job discrimination against the unemployed
With a persistently poor economy, one uphill battle unemployed Americans have to face is job discrimination. Many employers explicitly discriminate against jobless Americans, warning them not to even apply.
Joining New Jersey, Oregon, and Washington, D.C., the New York City council recently passed a bill to ban this discrimination. But Mayor Michael Bloomberg just vetoed it. He had previously called the bill misguided and claimed that it would hurt small businesses.
Read more: http://boldprogressives.org/michael-bloomberg-vetoes-bill-to-ban-job-discrimination-against-the-unemployed/#.USfBR6U4uSo
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)The best qualified person maybe would never get a chance to apply if she/he were unemployed.
Report1212
(661 posts)He talks a big game about being so cosmopolitan on other things..
Macoy51
(239 posts)Wait, he is so concerned about my health that he outlaws large sodas, but doesnt care enough to outlaw unemployment discrimination?? Does he not realize the stress to your health being unemployed causes?
How about helping all the unemployed find jobs first, and then worry about their waistlines.
Macoy
EC
(12,287 posts)over ride his veto?
This needs to be seen by some of the Bloomberg defenders around here.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I lived in NYC for 12 years until last July, Bloomberg has always been a pig.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)I mean how do you prove the discrimination?
dsc
(52,162 posts)unemployed need not apply.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Instead when HR gets a resume from someone unemployed...they simply trash it and say they are "unqualified" for some made up reason.
HR departments do this all the time. They will find ways to get around it.
A lot of executive search firms (headhunters) only deal with people who are already employed. They won't even give you the time of day if you are unemployed.
Cork
(44 posts)the difference is this 1% is in charge. Michael Bloomberg is not for the working class people, he's proved time and again that his interest is for the 1%.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Brigid
(17,621 posts)is OK, but soda is not?