General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTaking McCarthyism literally
By Steve Benen
When his detractors talk about Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), the one word that seems to come up more than any other is "McCarthyism." The point, of course, is to draw parallels between Cruz's worst habits and those of former Sen. Joe McCarthy (R-Wis.), who led ruthless and baseless witch hunts against his perceived rivals -- while mastering the art of guilt by association -- before being censured by the Senate in 1954, in an effort led by McCarthy's own Republicans colleagues.
Though Cruz is nowhere near McCarthy's level -- give the Texan time, he only joined the Senate last month -- the accusations are not without merit. We saw repeated examples of this during Cruz's campaign against Chuck Hagel's Defense Secretary nomination, which led Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) to recently note, "It was really reminiscent of a different time and place, when you said, 'I have here in my pocket a speech you made on such and such a date,' and, of course, nothing was in the pocket. It was reminiscent of some bad times."
It was a trick Cruz leaned on repeatedly to question Hagel's loyalty and patriotism, going so far as to suggest, without evidence, the former Republican senator may have received unreported funds from foreign enemies of the United States.
But Jane Mayer reports today that it wasn't too long ago that Cruz delivered a speech at a Fourth of July weekend political rally, sponsored by the Koch brothers' political group, accusing Harvard Law School of harboring secret Communists on its faculty
Cruz greeted the (2010) audience jovially, but soon launched an impassioned attack on President Obama, whom he described as "the most radical" President "ever to occupy the Oval Office." (I was covering the conference and kept the notes.)
He then went on to assert that Obama, who attended Harvard Law School four years ahead of him, "would have made a perfect president of Harvard Law School." The reason, said Cruz, was that, "There were fewer declared Republicans in the faculty when we were there than Communists! There was one Republican. But there were twelve who would say they were Marxists who believed in the Communists overthrowing the United States government."
- more -
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/02/22/17057953-taking-mccarthyism-literally
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Photo at OP link.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/02/22/1626661/ted-cruz-claims-he-has-a-list-of-communists-who-have-infiltrated-harvard-law-seriously/
Ted Cruz (L) and Joe McCarthy (R)
The caption sure helps. LOL!
Sugarcoated
(7,724 posts)how similar they are . . . and chilling.
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)McCarthy was a drunk. Some say he a closet full of skeletons too. Allen West said there were 78 to 81 communists in the House Democratic caucus. How'd that work out for him?
McCarthy also coined the term Democrat Party, which aside from condescending is bad English. Democrat and Party are both nouns and using the term Democrat as an adjective to modify the noun Party can only come from a moron or drunk Publican.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publican
hughee99
(16,113 posts)x does not necessarily need to be an adjective to modify "party" (though in practical use, it often is).
For example, Bull Moose isn't an adjective even though the party name was the Bull Moose Party (of course, this was another name of the Progressive Party, and Progressive is an adjective).
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)I'll trade two nouns for an adjective and buy a vowel. Or I could just join the communist Party.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)to Canada.
Ted 'Calgary' Cruz: Michele Bachmann with a twang
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/02/22/1189110/-Ted-Calgary-Cruz-Michele-Bachmann-with-a-twang
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid