Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKansas GOP produces bill to outlaw even indirect public participation in sustainable development
Geophysicist's bill prohibits sustainable development
Wichita legislator has ties to oil and gas industry
Rep. Dennis Hedke, a Republican, brought the bill to the House Energy and Environment Committee of which he is chairman. He said Tuesday he saw no conflict of interest in the fact that he is a contract geophysicist whose client list includes 30 regional oil and gas companies.
"I can't see why," Hedke said. "I didn't think about that. It really never crossed my mind. I'd probably just say no."
...
The bill, HB 2366, defines sustainable development as "a mode of human development in which resource use aims to meet human needs while preserving the environment so that these needs can be met not only in the present, but also for generations to come, but not to include the idea, principle or practice of conservation or conservationism."
It prohibits public funds from being used "either directly or indirectly, to promote, support, mandate, require, order, incentivize, advocate, plan for, participate in or implement sustainable development."
http://cjonline.com/news/2013-02-19/geophysicists-bill-prohibits-sustainable-development#.USPk4waAoZo.facebook
Wichita legislator has ties to oil and gas industry
Rep. Dennis Hedke, a Republican, brought the bill to the House Energy and Environment Committee of which he is chairman. He said Tuesday he saw no conflict of interest in the fact that he is a contract geophysicist whose client list includes 30 regional oil and gas companies.
"I can't see why," Hedke said. "I didn't think about that. It really never crossed my mind. I'd probably just say no."
...
The bill, HB 2366, defines sustainable development as "a mode of human development in which resource use aims to meet human needs while preserving the environment so that these needs can be met not only in the present, but also for generations to come, but not to include the idea, principle or practice of conservation or conservationism."
It prohibits public funds from being used "either directly or indirectly, to promote, support, mandate, require, order, incentivize, advocate, plan for, participate in or implement sustainable development."
http://cjonline.com/news/2013-02-19/geophysicists-bill-prohibits-sustainable-development#.USPk4waAoZo.facebook
So, this means public funds can only go to unsustainable projects. It wouldn't matter if a project was sustainable by accident - if it's sustainable, public money cannot be even indirectly involved. The only purpose of public funding is to ruin the environment.
But, of course, the 'constituents' who he says he's representing aren't among his 30 energy industry clients. No, that hadn't even begun to cross his mind ...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1100 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kansas GOP produces bill to outlaw even indirect public participation in sustainable development (Original Post)
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2013
OP
drm604
(16,230 posts)1. I wonder if there's much support for this bill.
Hopefully this doesn't stand a chance at actually passing.
LonePirate
(13,424 posts)2. It's Kansas. If it is a bad idea and sponsored by a Republican, chances are high it will become law.