General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWell, okay then.
Sue Swayze, the legislative director of Indiana Right to Life, told local radio station WBAA that that goal of the bill is to protect womens safety and hold abortion clinics to higher health standards. She said she does not understand why it would be a problem to mandate transvaginal ultrasounds. I got pregnant vaginally, she said. Something else could come in my vagina for a medical test that wouldnt be that intrusive to me. So I find that argument a little ridiculous.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/21/double-ultrasound-bill-indiana_n_2734658.html?utm_hp_ref=politics
Solly Mack
(90,767 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Stupid really should be painful.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)"To protect womens safety and hold abortion clinics to higher health standards"
..... by having an ultrasound? that is BS; just raises the price of procedure and cuts out lower income patients esp.the very young
lsewpershad
(2,620 posts)because she likes it so much.
peace13
(11,076 posts)She obviously has never had one. To force unnecessary penetration is a form of rape in my book. Stay out of other women's bodies, Sue!
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Maybe she could go on tv and have one done on herself and show us all how much fun they are. I've had them. They are not fun. They are embarrassing and uncomfortable.
2naSalit
(86,622 posts)dangerous! Those are actually not only penetrating your inner body with a physical device but a device that emits ultrasound waves which could lead to uterine cancer among other maladies. Whomever it was who invented those, I believe, never intended them to be used in this manner or for this purpose. And it was probably not a woman who invented them. I suspect they were invented to detect cancerous cells but if these things are forced beyond the birth canal, they should be outlawed all together. It's not just rape, it's also torture with intent to do severe damage to a woman's body and psyche.
The use of such devices in general practice is not only humiliating but painful, dangerous and intended to punish women on a number of ideological levels and have no place in general OB/GYN practices.
Any politician who advocates for the use of these things should also be forced to endure the use of them including the male faction, and if they don't like it they can just close their eyes.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)That and the blood tests. Hopefully, there will be a better way to detect it in the future, but for now I will go for my annual tests. It should not be used for trying to prevent abortions.
2naSalit
(86,622 posts)they were probably invented to detect caner, like ovarian cancer, but have no business being used for anything else. It seems that somebody will be making some serious money off of this, like the corporation who manufactures them.
I stopped having pap smears and all other exams at 45. If I get cancer then I guess I'll just have to live with it until it wins the game. There's no way I could pay for any kind of treatment and I really don't care to prolong my life given that the quality of my life would be so degraded that I wouldn't consider it worthwhile... and I am done with the medical industrial complex and choose not to participate in that anymore. I make my own medicines with legal ingredients and when those are not enough, I will be done inhabiting this body anyway. I ain't a scared of dying, not in the least. I just want it to be quick when it happens, even if I have to help it. I've witnessed enough family and friends enduring the cancer ordeal and most were regretting that they attempted to fight it before it was over. Some of them died from the treatment that was allegedly designed to heal them. Not interested in going that route.
Uncle Joe
(58,362 posts)Thanks for the thread, kpete.
magellan
(13,257 posts)...not by a virtual stranger who stuck something inside her because the state mandated it.
Still not seeing the difference, Sue?