Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 04:15 PM Feb 2013

59% of America’s “tuna” isn’t actually tuna

59% of America’s “tuna” isn’t actually tuna

Nonprofit ocean protection group Oceana took 1,215 samples of fish from across the United States and genetically tested them in order to bring us the following astonishing facts:

59% of the fish labeled “tuna” sold at restaurants and grocery stores in the US is not tuna.
Sushi restaurants were far more likely to mislabel their fish than grocery stores or other restaurants.

What’s for dinner at your local sushi joint? Pretty much anything but what’s on the menu. Oceana

In Chicago, Austin, New York, and Washington DC, every single sushi restaurant sampled sold mislabeled tuna.

84% of fish samples labeled “white tuna” were actually escolar, a fish that can cause prolonged, uncontrollable, oily anal leakage.

The only fish more likely to be misrepresented than tuna was snapper, which was mislabeled 87% of the time, and was in actuality any of six different species.


http://finance.yahoo.com/news/59-america-tuna-isn-t-161548034.html

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. I do not want to experience prolonged uncontrolable leakage. Especially oily anal leakage.
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 04:17 PM
Feb 2013

This is disturbing news...

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
7. I think so, but the headline does not make it clear. At all.
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 04:44 PM
Feb 2013

I can see how many readers will come away wondering what's in the cans of tuna at the supermarket, that are all clearly labelled. That's unfair to the tuna canners.
 

rdharma

(6,057 posts)
3. Don't they mean "sushi tuna"?
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 04:31 PM
Feb 2013

escolar is actually more expensive than normal run-of-the-mill tuna and is usually found as a substitute only for the highly priced specialized gourmet tuna used in sushi.

The gempylotoxin it contains, is very similar to castor or mineral oil. This is what gives the flesh of escolar its oily texture. As a result, when full portions of escolar are consumed, these wax esters cause gastrointestinal symptoms like "sharts"!




meow2u3

(24,764 posts)
10. No wonder the "tuna" has been tasting funny lately
Thu Feb 21, 2013, 05:01 PM
Feb 2013

It just ain't really tuna. Not even my cat, Ruby, will touch it.

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
12. I had some canned tuna (albacore) recently...
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 01:52 PM
Feb 2013

... that was caught by a neighbor and canned in a small local cannery.

TOTALLY different than commercial canned albacore.

Not strong in taste, but very tasty. Like the difference between home-grown chicken and Tyson chicken.

These days I don't trust any fish whose history I don't know.

I catch my own salmon and deep sea cods.

I wouldn't eat farm raised salmon(?) that's jammed with hormones and antibiotics and has to be colored so it doesn't lay there on your plate like a giant pile of grey shit.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»59% of America’s “tuna” i...