Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNY Mag "He’s the unpopular leader of an unpopular party advocating unpopular ideas..."
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/02/john-boehner-traps-himself-on-the-sequester.htmlJohn Boehner uses a Wall Street Journal op-ed today to signal his partys strategy, such as it is, on the budget sequester. The main message is to blame President Obama for the budget sequester. Now, that part of the message is obviously untrue the sequester was a way to escape an economic crisis ginned up by House Republicans, and Boehner himself touted it in 2011.
But the untruth of Boehners claim that Obama is the Father of the Sequester isnt the real problem here that fact will get buried in he-said, she-said reporting. The bigger problem with Boehners strategy is what comes next.
Boehners end goal, as explained in the op-ed, is to reform America's safety net and retirement-security programs. He has no proposal to do so, however. And for good reason. Cutting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid is really, really unpopular. Boehner wants Obama to offer his own proposals to cut these programs to give Republicans political cover. But Obama wont do that unless Republicans offer to increase tax revenue. And that is the thing they absolutely, positively refuse to concede on. (Cutting a deal on spending and revenue could cost Boehner his post.)
So what is Boehners play here? One possibility might be to just try to cancel out the sequester perhaps in some sneaky way by replacing it with some future commission that would pretend to cut the deficit but really wouldnt. The trouble here is that Boehner promised his own ultra wing he would carry it out earlier this year. The other possibility would be to just live with the sequester more or less permanently, or until Republicans can gain full control of government. The trouble here is that Boehner promised his defense hawk members the sequester would never go into effect. Conservative reporter Byron York notes that Boehners message that the sequester is a disaster totally undermines his chances of just sticking with the sequester.
There seems to be no outcome for him that would let him attain even the minimal goal of keeping his job, let alone advancing some policy outcome he prefers.
It is actually a fascinating thing about Boehner. He keeps wedging himself into impossible situations and somehow escaping. One interpretation (put forward by Ross Douthat) is that he is a highly clever pol who manages to defuse crises. It could be. But it also seems that Boehners technique for escaping each crisis involves putting off irreconcilable promises. He got through the expiration of the Bush tax cuts and the debt ceiling by promising his members a grand, successful clash the next time.
Boehner may be in a better spot now to fight Obama, but hes not in a good spot. He's given himself no way out save the total victory of forcing Obama to swallow entitlement cuts without revenue, a goal he almost certainly cant attain. Hes the unpopular leader of an unpopular party advocating unpopular ideas against a reasonably well-regarded president, so a public fight will decrease rather than increase his leverage. Maybe Boehner has some brilliant, secret plan to escape this trap, but assumptions like that have a pretty bad track record.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1720 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NY Mag "He’s the unpopular leader of an unpopular party advocating unpopular ideas..." (Original Post)
Laura PourMeADrink
Feb 2013
OP
a party which only wins via gerrymandering and otherwise gaming the system (n/t)
thesquanderer
Feb 2013
#2
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)1. Boehner's Op Ed in WSJ
thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)2. a party which only wins via gerrymandering and otherwise gaming the system (n/t)