General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGrand Old Jurassic Party
The Republican Party is a presidential election away from extinction. If it cant win the 2016 contest, and unless it has bolstered its congressional presence beyond the benefits of gerrymandered redistrictingwhich is to say not only retaking the Senate but polling more votes than the opposition nationallythe party will die. It will die not for reasons of branding or marketing or electoral cosmetics but because the party is at odds with the inevitable American trajectory in the direction of liberty, and with its own nature; paradoxically the party of Abraham Lincoln, which once saved the Union and which gives such passionate lip service to constitutionality, has come to embody the values of the Confederacy in its hostility to constitutional federalism and the civil bonds that the founding document codifies. The Republican Party will vanish not because of what its says but because of what it believes, not because of how it presents itself but because of who it is when it thinks no one is looking.
The contention by some that the GOP has an identity crisis is nonsense. Its hard to remember any political organization in the last half century that had a clearer idea of itself. The partys problem isnt what it doesnt know but what everyone else does know, which is thatas displayed in Congress on Tuesday night at the presidents State of the Union address, when Republicans could barely muster perfunctory support for the most benign positions favoring fair pay and opposing domestic violencethe party apparently despises women, gays, Latinos, African Americans, the poor, and the old. The more indelible this impression becomes, the more impossible it will be for even an estimable candidate, be it Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, or the now famously desiccated Marco Rubio, to transcend the party that nominates him. This isnt to say that the argument for limited government will die with the party. It has been part of the American conversation since James Madison and Alexander Hamilton squared off over the Constitution in 1789, with Thomas Jefferson and John Adams each in their corners holding the coats of their respective protégés. The intent of the argument, however, has changed from an essential advocacy of freedom to retribution against the weak.
The Republican Party was born of the most righteous of purposes, which was the containment and eventual elimination of slavery. Trumping the partys love of the free market was the insistence that a human being should not be one of that markets commodities: FREE LABOR, FREE LAND, FREE MEN was the partys manifesto in the 1850s. Four decades after Lincoln, the party under Theodore Roosevelt believed that the captains, colonels, and generals of industry who most profited from the market had become the markets biggest threat and needed to be constrained for the markets sake. In the 1960s the candidacy of Barry Goldwater represented not the birth of modern corporate conservatism as later embodied by President Ronald Reagan and then Newt Gingrich, Dick Cheney, and Eric Cantor, but a libertarianism more practical and less unhinged than the present-day version. Sometime in the last 30 years, however, the party became a flack to corporate culture at the expense of either freedom or individualism, and as the country grows more economically oligarchic, the Republican Party that best reflects that oligarchy loses political credibility with the public.
http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/the_grand_old_jurassic_party_partner/