Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 09:34 PM Feb 2013

News media exists for one reason. Never forget that.

They exist to sell ad time, to get people to watch. They do this by providing entertainment as "nothing new to report, be patient and eventually we will find out" just doesn't sell that time.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
News media exists for one reason. Never forget that. (Original Post) uppityperson Feb 2013 OP
I respectfully disagree. Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #1
I think this is correct. It has changed in my lifetime. It used to be to sell ads; enough Feb 2013 #3
Sad, but true. n/t Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #4
Dual purpose, sell ads and tell us what they want us to see. Someone else will probably tell me uppityperson Feb 2013 #7
I was born a skeptic.. Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #8
Me too. uppityperson Feb 2013 #9
Which is why I watch all political events on C-Span Richardo Feb 2013 #2
I'm with Richardo, if it didn't show on Cspan it didn't happen, but your point is well made. 1-Old-Man Feb 2013 #5
clowns and puppets Angry Dragon Feb 2013 #6
It used to exist to inform the public and was considered a profit loss. Cleita Feb 2013 #10

Sekhmets Daughter

(7,515 posts)
1. I respectfully disagree.
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 09:41 PM
Feb 2013

News broadcast media exists for the sole purpose of propaganda. They used to have to provide one hour a day of free news as a public service, in exchange for using the airwaves. When that was changed they became propaganda machines for the conservative agenda. We haven't had real news reporting for decades. The sale of ads is just the cover they are happy to hide behind.

enough

(13,259 posts)
3. I think this is correct. It has changed in my lifetime. It used to be to sell ads;
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 10:22 PM
Feb 2013

now it is to disseminate the propaganda of the corporate/finance/political powers. This was predicted by acute observers before it happened, but the extent of the change has been more complete than I could have imagined.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
7. Dual purpose, sell ads and tell us what they want us to see. Someone else will probably tell me
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 11:21 PM
Feb 2013

another reason they exist, which is fine as we all see things a bit differently from each other and sharing is good.

Richardo

(38,391 posts)
2. Which is why I watch all political events on C-Span
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 09:41 PM
Feb 2013

No commentators telling me what I'm hearing (and getting it wrong) - just the politician and his/her own words.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
10. It used to exist to inform the public and was considered a profit loss.
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 11:50 PM
Feb 2013

Then someone changed a law back in the seventies. Don't remember the details, but then the newsrooms got put under the entertainment division of the networks, were required to make money and that was the beginning of the end. The great anchors, Walter Cronkite, Ed Murrow and finally Dan Rather were edged out of the ranks and replaced with perky personalities. News became tabloid worthy and here we are.

News shows used to follow a format. First you had global headlines, then the nation, then business and maybe entertainment and sports last. Then you had the local news, but today, it seems we start basically with the local headlines and entertainment. The only way I find to get global news is by watching Al Jazeera and the BBC. In order to get national news I have to cruise the internet.

It all sucks.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»News media exists for one...