Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 12:48 PM Feb 2013

My Toxic Couch’s Days Are Numbered: New Furniture Flammability Standard Proposed

This all started with a nearly 40-year-old California regulation known as Technical Bulletin 117 (TB117) that requires furniture to meet a strict flammability standard using an open flame test on the foam. The easiest and cheapest way to apply the standard has been to douse the foam with flame retardants, resulting in pounds of toxic and untested chemicals in most every piece of upholstered furniture sold today. But the problem with the current standard is that fires don’t start in the foam but on the outer covering, often times by cigarettes left smoldering on furniture fabric. Even worse, TB117 has been shown to provide no real benefit in a fire. In fact, furniture treated with flame retardants doesn’t burn any slower and the smoke and gases released from the fire are actually more toxic, putting firefighters’ health at greater risk for cancer.

In addition to being ineffective, many flame retardant chemicals have been shown to be harmful to human health and the environment. The widespread use of flame retardants has resulted in widespread exposure in humans. Most Americans carry much higher levels of these chemicals in their bodies than anyone else in the world and children in California contain some of the highest levels ever measured.

But flame retardants aren’t just polluting our homes—they are polluting the world, literally. During manufacturing, use and disposal, these chemicals are released into the environment where they can be found in air, water, and wildlife. Birds, fish, mammals including whales and dolphins and animals living far from sources of exposure, such as polar bears in the Arctic, have been found to have flame retardants in their bodies.

...

A revised furniture flammability standard TB 117-2013 was recently proposed for public comment. This new standard is smolder test of the furniture fabric and will provide better fire safety by addressing the most common cause of fires in furniture – cigarettes – at the place a fire would start – the outside covering. It will also mean that no chemicals will need to be used to meet the new standard – 85 percent of fabric coverings already meet the standard!


http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2013/02/11/my-toxic-couchs-days-are-numbered-new-furniture-flammability-standard-proposed/

People who accept the health risks of smoking should also accept the fire risks. We should not poison the rest of the people with ill advised regulations to protect them from themselves.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My Toxic Couch’s Days Are Numbered: New Furniture Flammability Standard Proposed (Original Post) FarCenter Feb 2013 OP
I don't care for your "either-or" conclusion at the bottom. MADem Feb 2013 #1

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. I don't care for your "either-or" conclusion at the bottom.
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 01:15 PM
Feb 2013
People who accept the health risks of smoking should also accept the fire risks. We should not poison the rest of the people with ill advised regulations to protect them from themselves.


What about the non-smoking children and adults in the house/hotel/duplex/apartment building? Must they just "suck it up?"

We live in a world where not everyone lives in a single-family home, alone, with perhaps one other non-smoker, who will never invite a drunken smoker to crash on their couch rather than drive while intoxicated.

If there is a way to reduce toxicity in furnishings I am all for it--I just can't get behind your logic at the end. Hell, my furniture is not "fireproofed"--it is old as the hills and has been handed down for several generations; about the only way we're like the Royal Family is that we don't have to buy our own furniture, either!

These rules aren't designed to protect the clever and conscientious non-smoker. They're geared to the lowest common denominator.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My Toxic Couch’s Days Are...