General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsParody Website Fools The Washington Post Into Thinking Sarah Palin Heading To Al Jazeera
http://www.mediaite.com/online/parody-website-fools-the-washington-post-into-thinking-sarah-palin-heading-to-al-jazeera/The Sarah Palin Story is a cautionary tale about what can happen when politics and celebrity meet, beginsWashington Post contributor Suzi Parkers profile of Sarah Palins move from Fox News Channel to the future cable news network Al Jazeera English. Late last week Al Jazeera America announced the former vice-presidential candidate would be joining their news network.
The only problem with Parkers scoop is that the news of Palins move comes from the comedy news site The Daily Currant, which recently published a wide-ranging interview with Palin about her lateral career move. The Daily Currant describes itself as the global satirical newspaper of record.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,829 posts)I hereby apologize. If the WaPo can be fooled I guess Poe's Law is now in full effect and it is no longer at all possible to distinguish satire from reality.
However, you'd think that a "respectable" newspaper like WaPo would verify its sources and/or know that the Daily Currant is a satire site. There's really no excuse for this kind of mistake by a major newspaper.
rocktivity
(44,577 posts)Last edited Sun Jul 13, 2014, 12:21 PM - Edit history (2)
...(Y)ou'd think that a "respectable" newspaper like WaPo would verify its sources and/or know that the Daily Currant is a satire site. There's really no excuse for this kind of mistake by a major newspaper.Well, if even the New York Times can fooled by an Onion story -- oh, wait, you said a RESPECTABLE newspaper...
rocktivity
TDale313
(7,820 posts)Lmao or face palm this one (or both) Some people seriously lack the satire gene.
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)She just needs to remember to always check her sources. She has since corrected herself.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2013/02/12/sarah-palins-plan-to-reach-millions-of-devoutly-religious-people-through-al-jazeera/
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)edited to add:
The reporter was fooled by the Daily Currant TWICE?
Amazing.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)it seems to be trying to fool people rather than make a point. This is not meant to excuse that Washington Post reporter, she should be embarrassed.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,829 posts)What they call satire is sometimes pretty close to what others might call libel.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)Wondering whether the reason so many people were fooled is that they expect satire to be funny.
rocktivity
(44,577 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 20, 2013, 04:21 PM - Edit history (8)
The Daily Currant...seems to be trying to fool people rather than make a point.I once described The Onion as being able to "take a crumb of truth and turn it into a three-tiered cake with frosting." Andy Borowitz is in their weight class, but not the Currant, despite their claim that their international perspective is what distinguishes them. Because they try to exploit the moment rather than make a point with it, their crumbs of truth come out as wet, cold porridge.
The Currant's story about Marco Rubio's GOP state of the Union response speech is titled Rubio Introduces Bill to Fund Dehydration Awareness; the Onion's, Rich White People Get Latino Guy To Do Some Work For Them. See the difference?
rocktivity
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)... is a fool.
The WaPo should be ashamed and ready for a volley of well-deserved ridicule.
Bennyboy
(10,440 posts)How Wash Post did not already have the DC Flagged for satire is weird if you ask me. I know now for about two months I'd say that I knew (I got hooked once or twice myself)
They are great satire, cutting a bit closer to the truth than the Onion does.
benld74
(9,909 posts)contributing journalists DO NOT GO THE EXTRA step to VETT their OWN STORIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
obxhead
(8,434 posts)It's what legitimate news sources do.
If the WAPO can not or will not do this, then they should no longer be considered a legitimate news source.