General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAs a liberal Catholic, my platform for the new pope.
Somewhat realistic issues that I would hope could be addressed by the new pope.
1. A complete audit/investigation of the child abuse scandal. Remove any priest or church official that has had any serious accusation of molestation leveled against him. Turn over all documents from the investigation to appropriate law enforcement agencies.
2. Expand the role of women in the church. Allow for women as priests and deacons. Give women a greater role in the dialogue on church teachings. Tell the American Bishops to back off their attacks on the nuns.
3. An increased emphasis on social justice. There's more to Catholicism than gays and abortion. Help the poor, feed the hungry, give clothes to the naked, etc....
4. Reevaluate position on contraceptives. 3 and 4 go hand in hand. How many improvement projects in the Third World have been rejected by the church because they include funding for contraceptives?
Ultimate "pie in the sky" hope: Reevaluate position on gays and gay marriage.
longship
(40,416 posts)Nice to dream, though.
If the Vatican truly wants the Catholic Church to remain relevant, they'd, at minimum, take such suggestions very seriously.
R&K
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)they would be in favor of giving out condoms like candy. Every church would have a big bowl for people to help themselves.
snacker
(3,619 posts)ButterflyBlood
(12,644 posts)I don't care. That institution isn't changing and is far too corrupt to be of any value. Time to get out. I ended up joining of all things a charismatic evangelical church that is still liberal-leaning. Yes, such a thing exists...but a liberal Pope will not. I follow Jesus, not a flawed man.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)...it would change the church dramatically for the better. They are running out of priests.
charlie and algernon
(13,447 posts)that should fill the ranks pretty quickly.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)No, not because of American Catholics, (though it's part of the reason). You realize your points will have you excommunicated in large sections of the Church in both Africa and Latin America? The conclave will be fascinating. Expect a push for a Latin American pope. You think Ratzinger was in the 12th century, you will see this go back to the 7th.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)Here's hoping they come to their senses.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)To keep anything from looking like liberation theology from even getting close.
mn9driver
(4,428 posts)Also, he will still be alive to influence the selection of his successor. I fear the Church is looking at a generation of extreme conservative leadership.
RainbowSuperfund
(110 posts)If that is the case, Then it's all over but the funeral for me. But I Love me some Nuns on a bus. GO Ladies! May you land on your feet no matter what the clowns in charge do.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)...but I really think that is the reason why they fight against women's reproductive rights to begin with, to enable their reproductive exploitation of poor and at risk pregnant women.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Is it doctrinal or simply practice?
Bryant
charlie and algernon
(13,447 posts)Ignoring the fact that Mary and other women were certainly as involved as the Apostles were.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)than it's a lot harder get. If it's practice than it should be changeable.
Bryant
yardwork
(61,700 posts)Women were priests. They were apostles. There were books in the Bible written by women. Many early Christians were female martyrs. Mary Magdalene was not a prostitute. She was a leader in her community, a woman of wealth and influence. Jesus was not sexist in his teachings, quite the opposite.
All this crap against women came much later, some of it 1,000 years later.
ButterflyBlood
(12,644 posts)I will NEVER belong to any church that will not ordain women. Fuck tradition and whatever I was raised.
As it is I now go to a church where women not only preach, this is often while wearing jeans and a hoodie!
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)At the very fundamental level, the rationale is simply that Jesus was a man and therefore a man is supposed to be the head, God's gender of choice to be spiritual leaders.
Jesus choose his 12 apostles as all men, and they chose men to succeed them. The Church considers themselves bound to this because it was the will of Jesus. It will never, ever change.
It is quite simply a patriarchal religion. Even though God is not supposed to have a gender, ask any person to draw a picture of god. Over 90% of people will likely draw an old man.
yardwork
(61,700 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)In the early Church, the Mass was a meal called agape that was celebrated in homes and women presided over it because they were the ones who baked the bread and prepared and served the food and wine.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)yardwork
(61,700 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,191 posts)Who advocated strongly for social and economic justice and for a "seamless garment of life"
But given the conservative makeup of the College of Cardinals, I'm doubtful we'll see that happen. Oh well, I guess I can hope....
Cleita
(75,480 posts)to modernize the Church with Vatican II, was assassinated. He just died too abruptly. Supposedly he had stomach cancer, but I think he was helped along. His reforms were agitating the conservative Cardinals in the Church.
sadbear
(4,340 posts)Tree-Hugger
(3,370 posts)I belong to an Old Apostolic Catholic Church. Same core beliefs, sacraments and Mass structure as Roman Catholicism. However, we do not view the Pope as infallible. Women are able to be ordained. We have an ordained woman at my parish. Gays are welcomed. Priests can marry. My pastor is openly gay and in a committed relationship. He performs gay wedding ceremonies, though our state does not recognize them. It's a nice place for a liberal like me who doesn't want to give up her Catholic roots.
I would hope the Roman Catholic Church moves towards something like the OACC, but I have a bad feeling that they are going to hold tight to conservatism.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)It sounds like a fine Church though for those who are religiously inclined.
Tree-Hugger
(3,370 posts)But it is a fine Church.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Tree-Hugger
(3,370 posts)I call myself Catholic because I am Catholic. If that bothers you, there is nothing I can do. I know my own faith. God bless...
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)in front of the word "Catholic".
I was raised a Catholic, and by the time I was 12 I knew there was something profoundly wrong with a system that put celibate (supposedly) men in charge of telling women what to do with their bodies.
Because of the structure of the Catholic Church, remaining with it while saying, "Oh, I'm liberal, I use birth control, I think women should be priests," and so on, has absolutely no impact on the Church's teachings or behaviors. And, if you're contributing money to the Church, you're only perpetuating their current teachings, the sex abuse, and so on. It's my considered opinion that unless millions of Catholics were to leave, nothing will change. It's not as though the average Catholic on the street has any impact on who gets elected Pope. So while your listing of issues that should be addressed by the new Pope are spot-on, it'll never happen.
If you have the need to be in an organized faith community, there are plenty out there which already have women pastors, emphasize real social justice, and so on.
Bucky
(54,041 posts)There's scads of liberal Protestant denominations that are pro-gay marriage, pro-birth control, pro-social justice, ordain women, and let their pastors marry, thus providing a far broader talent pool to draw from and creating a hierarchy a bit more predisposed toward seeing child molesters punished.
Of course, if you got a deal about transsubstatiation of the wafers, you might have a problem there...
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Bucky
(54,041 posts)Methodism is actually a fairly pragmatic methadone for recovering Catholics. They got women priests, gay priests, shit I think they even got a lesbian bishop stashed away somewhere in the Frost Belt. They hardly hate anybody and they encourage you to ask troubling questions, which is all but permission to come up with your own answers. If I wasn't a UU myself I'd probably go Methy. It's also a hell of a good place to get stock investment tips.
I don't literally mean "hell of a" of course.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)and, though the eucharist is the high point of worship (we keep the mass), we leave room for various opinons on the host (wafers.)
http://www.episcopalchurch.org/
all the ceremony, half the guilt - robin williams
lindysalsagal
(20,726 posts)only seeks to perpetuate itself at the expense of regular people.
The church's words sound holy enough, but it's actions are anything but holy.
The occasional charity is just minor window dressing.
How about selling the holdings of the vatican museum to feed, educate and clothe all of the people it claims to value so damn much?
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,999 posts)Thank you
My daughter rejoined the Catholic Church and while she understands you can- and does-disagree with certain things, I think a better pope will make her more comfortable with it. I don't argue religion with her, but she's well aware I dislike the current pope. And Why.
Kingofalldems
(38,469 posts)and expanded ecumenism.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)two through four are something we take as a given, while basically keeping the same mass, as episcopalians. as such i have a lot of respect for - and understanding of - the roman church but have always found the official positions on gender and sexual/sexuality issues to be unapproachable. i (and i am on the outside looking in) find much of this due to the celibate priesthood. it seems to be the root of much of your church's current problems.