Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,013 posts)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:02 AM Feb 2013

Coal companies pay 25¢ a ton for coal from public lands turn around and sell it for $35 a ton

The coal industry, for as much as it whines and frets and fake-cries about how oppressive the government is, gets a pretty sweet deal. We’ve noted before than companies pay 25 cents a ton for coal from public lands and then can turn around and sell it for $35 a ton. (We’ve also mentioned that they often sell that coal to China, meaning we’re subsidizing the world’s largest consumer of coal, but that’s a whole other issue.)


What makes this so much more galling is that the weepy coal companies might not even be paying for all of the coal they’re extracting. From The Hill:

Interior is looking into whether mining firms lowball the value of coal excavated from federal lands to minimize the fees they pay the government. …

Reuters said mining companies are underreporting the price of coal at mine sites — where royalties are assessed — then selling it to marketers that they often times own. Reuters said those intermediaries then ship the coal abroad, where they fetch higher prices.


http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/281991-interior-to-investigate-coal-exports
http://grist.org/news/have-coal-companies-been-ripping-americans-off-even-more-than-we-already-knew/
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
1. Mining is expensive..
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:11 AM
Feb 2013

I don't really think what they pay for it is as important as the cost of production..if the cost of production is $3 per ton, then yes, something is wrong with this picture. If production cost is $25, not so much..

2naSalit

(86,767 posts)
2. Old news
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:45 AM
Feb 2013

like since the Mining Act of 187?. this has been going on forever, the actual market value may have changed over the years but the fact that they are ripping us off and have been all this time is not new. But I'm glad you brought it out in the open for more people to see and think about. I will say thank you here.

It's too bad more people aren't enraged and engaged regarding this issue, it might have been changed by now. I never thought the figures we were seeing in the media were correct or even close. It's the same with oil, gas and timber... been that way for a long time. Oh, and did I mention public land grazing aka welfare ranching?


 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
6. Yep. Just another item on the endless list of private welfare parasites stealing from the people. nt
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 03:30 AM
Feb 2013

2naSalit

(86,767 posts)
7. I don't give a rat's ass about what he says in TSOTU
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 06:47 PM
Feb 2013

I want to see some real action regarding these issues, talk s cheap and getting cheaper by the hour.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
8. to be fair, they pay $0.25 per ton PLUS the costs of extraction, transport, workforce...
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 08:30 PM
Feb 2013

...remediation (if any), and so on. Not defending the coal industry, just trying to counter an obvious example of selective reporting.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
9. One wonders if a less than 1% royalty for coal mined on public lands is corporate largess and
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 10:17 PM
Feb 2013

welfare so odiously pungent as to smell to high heaven in comparison to the Teapot Dome hullabaloo.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Coal companies pay 25¢ a ...