Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,086 posts)
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 04:31 PM Feb 2013

Bill Moyers: Why U.S. Internet Access is Slow, Costly and Unfair




http://vimeo.com/59236702


Susan Crawford on Why U.S. Internet Access is Slow, Costly and Unfair
February 8, 2013


Susan Crawford, former special assistant to President Obama for science, technology and innovation, and author of Captive Audience: The Telecom Industry and Monopoly Power in the New Gilded Age, joins Bill to discuss how our government has allowed a few powerful media conglomerates to put profit ahead of the public interest — rigging the rules, raising prices, and stifling competition. As a result, Crawford says, all of us are at the mercy of the biggest business monopoly since Standard Oil in the first Gilded Age a hundred years ago.

“The rich are getting gouged, the poor are very often left out, and this means that we’re creating, yet again, two Americas, and deepening inequality through this communications inequality,” Crawford tells Bill.


http://billmoyers.com/segment/susan-crawford-on-why-u-s-internet-access-is-slow-costly-and-unfair/


93 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill Moyers: Why U.S. Internet Access is Slow, Costly and Unfair (Original Post) marmar Feb 2013 OP
K&R Sherman A1 Feb 2013 #1
Du rec. Nt xchrom Feb 2013 #2
I completely agree. BlueCaliDem Feb 2013 #3
Depends on what part of the US you live in. Chakab Feb 2013 #7
You lucky DAWG! BlueCaliDem Feb 2013 #10
How about this. timdog44 Feb 2013 #24
I'm on Mediacom SteveG Feb 2013 #28
ever hear of Hughes Net? druidity33 Feb 2013 #31
No DSL in your neck of the woods? nt MADem Feb 2013 #47
Phone lines are too old... druidity33 Feb 2013 #61
That is a real pity--so your choices are dial-up and MADem Feb 2013 #70
Damn!! LiberalFighter Feb 2013 #29
Oklahoma City, Cox Cable...FWIW Wednesdays Feb 2013 #34
Did you know that there's a rule ohheckyeah Feb 2013 #45
And you likely pay too much for it newthinking Feb 2013 #51
100 MB/S??? Wow! I have Time Warner and for internet it's great. I get like 60 MB/S. Initech Feb 2013 #58
This is what my $12 a month gets me. MattSh Feb 2013 #59
You're three times as fast and 1/4 the price of me. malthaussen Feb 2013 #63
4X faster than my speed and half of my price. nt emmadoggy Feb 2013 #78
More reason to want to go back home. . . (Ukraine) Paula Sims Feb 2013 #88
Using an LI server, I get: malthaussen Feb 2013 #62
Yeah, also notice that it says emmadoggy Feb 2013 #74
I know that this type of service is exetremely rare in the US. Chakab Feb 2013 #84
Do you mind me asking how much that service emmadoggy Feb 2013 #85
The exact cost is complicated Chakab Feb 2013 #86
I loved Optimum Autumn Colors Feb 2013 #82
I used to work for a phone company as a programmer. djean111 Feb 2013 #4
I used to work for an ISP... Aquavit Feb 2013 #55
70 is the price for their high speed xmas74 Feb 2013 #66
Nothing changes but the changes with the telcos. lpbk2713 Feb 2013 #5
Can I buy a heart for Bill Moyers? bvar22 Feb 2013 #6
You know, that's something you might want to mention to Skinner. aquart Feb 2013 #17
I'm going to have to read this guy's book... secondvariety Feb 2013 #8
And their signals cross through our public airspace, ground, and rights-of-way NBachers Feb 2013 #9
Bill Moyers is a national treasure upi402 Feb 2013 #11
Yes. Which is a problem for those of us who wish to vote for Hillary. aquart Feb 2013 #13
Hillary promoted NAFTA and was on WalMart's board upi402 Feb 2013 #23
Well, sometimes they grow and learn. aquart Feb 2013 #90
He certainly is. This is a great piece ProfessionalLeftist Feb 2013 #21
+1000 DeSwiss Feb 2013 #44
Privatization is NOT in the public interest. aquart Feb 2013 #12
Other countries made major public investments. Correlation? OFC. nt EastKYLiberal Feb 2013 #14
BS. Clinton handed Verizon and AT&T billions of our money. They stole it and walked Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #43
Bill Moyers re Interrnet ReRe Feb 2013 #15
Rural Internet access would be a good issue for Dems gulliver Feb 2013 #16
+1 Overseas Feb 2013 #37
x1000 libtodeath Feb 2013 #87
Abso-fucken-lutely! Jackpine Radical Feb 2013 #89
I'm out in the country stuck with Earthlink (AT&T) Elwood P Dowd Feb 2013 #18
Because a basic need is once again hostage to a capitalist profit libtodeath Feb 2013 #19
Well what would one expect.... INdemo Feb 2013 #20
Yep. And it's going to be the death of us. marmar Feb 2013 #30
As long as the US = Capitalism then we will be at the mercy of greed above all else. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2013 #22
just ran a test rickford66 Feb 2013 #25
We're in a high-tech area and this is what I get with broadband.... OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #26
contrast yours with this: corkhead Feb 2013 #32
Wow. After seeing yours, I feel pretty fortunate. nt. OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #33
Right about on par with this hellhole where I live GoCubsGo Feb 2013 #64
Hey! Our download speeds match! savebigbird Feb 2013 #71
I really wish we did not deal with Time Warner and their BS polices... mrdmk Feb 2013 #39
Did you notice that you are "faster than 75% of US"? Curmudgeoness Feb 2013 #41
An oligarchy run by capitalists .... MindMover Feb 2013 #27
K & R Wounded Bear Feb 2013 #35
K&R. I'd love to see her as chair of the FCC! Overseas Feb 2013 #36
On The Media had a good segment w/David Cay Johnston on this... MinM Feb 2013 #38
Well, our govt needs to do something about this. EVERYONE in our country should Honeycombe8 Feb 2013 #40
Sensible Oversight... MrMickeysMom Feb 2013 #42
Sign the White House petition to appoint Susan Crawford to the FCC. Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #46
+100! snot Feb 2013 #48
Spread it around. n/t Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #50
B BainsBane Feb 2013 #49
I have friends in 2cd world locations with faster speeds lol newthinking Feb 2013 #52
Commies have faster internet speeds than the US? area51 Feb 2013 #57
This is so needed in rural areas. LeftInTX Feb 2013 #53
Glad that somebody that people will actually listen to is finally talking about this. Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #54
The reason why internet speeds are so slow and expensive is the fact they don't have competition, Chisox08 Feb 2013 #56
Many years ago in a land far away, competition meant better service ... MindMover Feb 2013 #93
Time Warner Cable... VenusRising Feb 2013 #60
Its the future of this "Exceptional America" where Our Government bonniebgood Feb 2013 #65
Change "Internet Access" to "Health Care" and you have the same story Doctor_J Feb 2013 #67
We have been paying an extra $10 a month to use our fancy 4g phones on a 3g network. Grantuspeace Feb 2013 #68
I thought all those xtra fees Gin Feb 2013 #69
Small Town Iowa tclark0404 Feb 2013 #72
I recommend David Kay Johnson's book Fine Print mikeysnot Feb 2013 #73
Cablevision speed Progressive dog Feb 2013 #75
Message auto-removed Gambart Feb 2013 #76
More rightwing talking points. Cobalt Violet Feb 2013 #80
Oh, I'd love to. hunter Feb 2013 #83
I think sometimes my posts come across as anti-technology me b zola Feb 2013 #77
Small town, Iowa. emmadoggy Feb 2013 #79
Couple this with the fact... awoke_in_2003 Feb 2013 #81
Study about world wide broadband speeds... octothorpe Feb 2013 #91
I live in rural Virginia, and this is the absolute best I can do. As you can see, it sucks. phylny Feb 2013 #92

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
3. I completely agree.
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 04:45 PM
Feb 2013

I have an internet speed of 12 mbps and I believed that was kick ass. Now I've learned from our Dutch friends (during a strenuous Skype session) that they have a 50 mbps internet speed that isn't even offered here in the U.S.!

AT&T Uverse offers 12 mbps, 18 mbps, and 24 mbps (max) and they charge an arm and a leg for it! I believe someone here at DU claimed that Denmark or Switzerland (can't remember) has 100 mbps standard!

 

Chakab

(1,727 posts)
7. Depends on what part of the US you live in.
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 05:19 PM
Feb 2013

Here on Long Island, the infrastructure is great. I get over 100mbps with Optimum Ultra.



BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
10. You lucky DAWG!
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 05:56 PM
Feb 2013

Mine read

Sad, ain't it? Oh well...

That said, thanks for the info. I didn't know there were differences in different parts of the country.

timdog44

(1,388 posts)
24. How about this.
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 06:50 PM
Feb 2013

Download - 4.61
Upload - 0.64

Its disgusting. I go back to the thing I have mentioned several times here on Democratic Underground. The game Monopoly only has one winner and the rest of are weiners. (I hope that is not offensive)

druidity33

(6,446 posts)
31. ever hear of Hughes Net?
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 08:05 PM
Feb 2013

that's Satellite internet. At $75 a month it's pretty much my only option here in rural MA. Also, they limit my bandwidth to 250MB per 24 hr period... Dialup is looking appealing right now...






druidity33

(6,446 posts)
61. Phone lines are too old...
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 08:35 AM
Feb 2013

apparently they won't support DSL. We still get the "party line" in town occasionally. You pick up the phone and can faintly here a neighbors conversation... ugh. No cel service here either. Our community is currently working on municipally owned fiber optic, but it'll take a few years.




MADem

(135,425 posts)
70. That is a real pity--so your choices are dial-up and
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 11:45 AM
Feb 2013

cruise-ship-quality satellite? A bummer, indeed.

Wednesdays

(17,398 posts)
34. Oklahoma City, Cox Cable...FWIW
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 09:36 PM
Feb 2013


Not too terrible. But isn't it also influenced by what kind of machine and/or system you're running?

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
45. Did you know that there's a rule
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 12:42 AM
Feb 2013

that the person with the highest internet speed has to buy hearts for everyone else?




newthinking

(3,982 posts)
51. And you likely pay too much for it
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 02:13 AM
Feb 2013

You are getting what my friends in the second world now get. And your speed is rare in the US.

First world economies are looking at speeds 5x that in the very near future (multimedia). We are falling behind.

MattSh

(3,714 posts)
59. This is what my $12 a month gets me.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 04:53 AM
Feb 2013


Notice this is Kiev, Ukraine. Not exactly the best place in the world for quality infrastructure. Or high-speed internet. But it ranks so much higher than much of the USA. Which is sad. Real sad.

And this is actually a slow day. I often get speeds 50% better. And this isn't even their best package. However, it is supposed to be 60Mb/s, a rate I've never gotten close to.

Paula Sims

(877 posts)
88. More reason to want to go back home. . . (Ukraine)
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 06:37 PM
Feb 2013

First waving to my Ukrainian brothers & sisters (Брати!)

Second, I pay almost $50 for DSL and here's what I get 5.17 download and .65 upload and I'm only a few hundred feed from the service provider!!! GGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRR.

Paula

malthaussen

(17,215 posts)
62. Using an LI server, I get:
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 08:52 AM
Feb 2013


Which is still a lot faster than the 300 baud modem I started with in 1980.

Note we use the same server for this test. I'm in Philly, though.

-- Mal

emmadoggy

(2,142 posts)
74. Yeah, also notice that it says
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 01:17 PM
Feb 2013

"faster than 97% of the US". So you are one of the select few who have access to that.


 

Chakab

(1,727 posts)
84. I know that this type of service is exetremely rare in the US.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 04:23 PM
Feb 2013

Last edited Sun Feb 10, 2013, 05:33 PM - Edit history (1)

I was just pointing out that there are a handful of places and ISPs in the country that aren't behind the curve when it comes to Internet service. Optimum also has WIFI hotspots all over Long Island and in the city for customers.

emmadoggy

(2,142 posts)
85. Do you mind me asking how much that service
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 05:22 PM
Feb 2013

costs you?

Just wondering if you also pay an ultra-premium price to have it. Thanks.

As you can see from the rest of us who have posted, you are very lucky to even have the OPTION of such premium service.


 

Chakab

(1,727 posts)
86. The exact cost is complicated
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 05:53 PM
Feb 2013

because there are discounts based the type of service that you have. According to cablevision's website. Basic internet service, Optimum Online, is $49.95 a month, and Optimum Ultra is another $50. There are two tiers of service between basic and Ultra.

I pay about $280 a month for a premium cable package with multi-room DVR service, a phone line and internet service. I actually started paying less when I added the VOIP service.



 

Autumn Colors

(2,379 posts)
82. I loved Optimum
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 02:33 PM
Feb 2013

I used to live in Cablevision/Optimum's region here in CT and they were great. After moving, I'm now in Charter's territory. Because I have a business account (faster response time during outages), I pay more for my service than what Optimum Ultra would cost ... yet this is my speed:

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
4. I used to work for a phone company as a programmer.
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 04:54 PM
Feb 2013

They dribble out speeds and services a little at a time so they can charge more.

Will be interesting to see if Google high speed changes the current price gouging, but if Google started at $70 a month (what I read somewhere), than I have no hope for that.

edited to add - I just used SpeedTest and I have 82.34 mbps - FIOS fiber optic.

Aquavit

(488 posts)
55. I used to work for an ISP...
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 03:27 AM
Feb 2013

And their pricing was astronomical. If you wanted 1 Mb up/down service, it was $60/mo + $500 to install. If you wanted 5Mb up/down service, you could expect to spend close to $600/mo - but they'd cut you a deal on install and only charge $100!

xmas74

(29,674 posts)
66. 70 is the price for their high speed
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 10:47 AM
Feb 2013

But you can get a basic lower speed for free up to seven years.

A friend is getting connected and I believe that's the rate. The 70 includes installation and is under contract. To get the free is $25 a month for one year, which pays the installation fees, and then free unless you choose to upgrade.

lpbk2713

(42,766 posts)
5. Nothing changes but the changes with the telcos.
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 05:02 PM
Feb 2013



They have been running the same scam for years. The only difference is they are now doing it in the internet age.


aquart

(69,014 posts)
17. You know, that's something you might want to mention to Skinner.
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 06:07 PM
Feb 2013

Maybe not hearts or stars, but a whole other symbol of admiration for a whole other fundraiser.

upi402

(16,854 posts)
11. Bill Moyers is a national treasure
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 05:59 PM
Feb 2013

Deep respect.

It was Bill Clinton that did the Telecommunications Act.
(And NAFTA)

Now this man opens his mouth and people still swoon to the bullshit.

upi402

(16,854 posts)
23. Hillary promoted NAFTA and was on WalMart's board
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 06:48 PM
Feb 2013

I want a Democrat to support, heart & soul.

How do they lose their way?

ProfessionalLeftist

(4,982 posts)
21. He certainly is. This is a great piece
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 06:41 PM
Feb 2013

His usually are. He covers topics the rest of the media won't cover and he covers them in ways they won't. He's a true journalist.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
43. BS. Clinton handed Verizon and AT&T billions of our money. They stole it and walked
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 12:31 AM
Feb 2013

away, and he let them. It's not our investment, it's our government letting them steal with impunity.

gulliver

(13,186 posts)
16. Rural Internet access would be a good issue for Dems
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 06:05 PM
Feb 2013

We need a full court press on free high-speed Internet access...urban and rural.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
89. Abso-fucken-lutely!
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 07:57 PM
Feb 2013

Along with a major effort to get better medical care including mental health care into rural areas.

And no, in the interest of heading off this particular distraction, the latter has nothing to do with guns.

Elwood P Dowd

(11,443 posts)
18. I'm out in the country stuck with Earthlink (AT&T)
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 06:15 PM
Feb 2013

at 1.06 Mbps. Pure crap, but unless I want to be ripped off by Charter Cable I'm stuck.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
20. Well what would one expect....
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 06:40 PM
Feb 2013

we are the only country in the world whose postal system is about to crash..So why should we have a decent cheap internet access?
Our infrastructure is owned by those that are owned by those that own the politicians.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
22. As long as the US = Capitalism then we will be at the mercy of greed above all else.
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 06:46 PM
Feb 2013

The really FUNNY thing is the idiots in charge STILL act like nobody here knows things outside of the US are better unless they say so.

rickford66

(5,528 posts)
25. just ran a test
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 06:55 PM
Feb 2013

Frontier DSL fiber optic line. 3.14 Mbps download and 0.32 Mbps upload. Better than dialup I guess. When I stream The Daily Show or Colbert it buffers every few seconds sometimes.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
26. We're in a high-tech area and this is what I get with broadband....
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 06:56 PM
Feb 2013


You'd think with all of the PhD types working at NASA and the Redstone Arsenal labs nearby that there would be a bigger demand for better connection speeds.

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
32. contrast yours with this:
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 09:02 PM
Feb 2013


I pay $80 per month for this. I live out in the sticks and have a small phone company that requires a $30 per month pots line to get the $50 per month "high speed" DSL

GoCubsGo

(32,086 posts)
64. Right about on par with this hellhole where I live
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 09:54 AM
Feb 2013

And, those assholes just raised our rates.



Such are the joys of living in a republican cesspool. The idiots here don't understand, and they don't care. They're like a bunch of freakin' frogs sitting in a pot of water, and they're cheering on the person who keeps turning up the heat underneath them. I really wish I could find my way out of here.

mrdmk

(2,943 posts)
39. I really wish we did not deal with Time Warner and their BS polices...
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 10:51 PM
Feb 2013

Yes they do pay attention to your neighbors. Check out the comparison of the download and upload speeds between our connections



I need to send graphics files around town. Driving there would also most be faster!

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
41. Did you notice that you are "faster than 75% of US"?
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 11:17 PM
Feb 2013

That makes this even more frightening.

I can't even watch videos.....if there is something really important to watch, I do that at work where they have the best of the best for our area----and my computer gets 15.45 download there. (I tested it because I was worried that it was my computer.)

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
27. An oligarchy run by capitalists ....
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 06:57 PM
Feb 2013

Last edited Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:43 PM - Edit history (2)


Very fortunate that we are not paying for the air we breathe ...



Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
40. Well, our govt needs to do something about this. EVERYONE in our country should
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 10:52 PM
Feb 2013

have cheap or free access to the internet. They have it in Europe. Cheap and much faster than what we have. Free market?

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
42. Sensible Oversight...
Sat Feb 9, 2013, 11:43 PM
Feb 2013

Absolutely ... This made sense, and to think that we've arrived at the fascist state where those who CAN afford can continue. It's an affront to democracy to continue the way we've gone.

Susan Crawford, Mr. President..... Susan Crawford!

area51

(11,918 posts)
57. Commies have faster internet speeds than the US?
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 04:02 AM
Feb 2013

Maybe N. Korea, Cuba? Communist countries are 2nd world countries.

LeftInTX

(25,494 posts)
53. This is so needed in rural areas.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 02:39 AM
Feb 2013

I've got TWC broadband in a major urban area, it's expensive. I feel bad for people who don't have a broadband option.

When my son was living at my mother in law's, he actually used his cell phone. He would hook up his cell phone to his laptop and was able to watch Netflix and the whole bit. It was through some company in addition to the cell phone provider.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
54. Glad that somebody that people will actually listen to is finally talking about this.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 02:57 AM
Feb 2013

We are and have been paying way too much for shitty service for over a decade. We are a two generations behind the rest of the world and are still imagining that we are number one.

Chisox08

(1,898 posts)
56. The reason why internet speeds are so slow and expensive is the fact they don't have competition,
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 03:36 AM
Feb 2013

where else are you going to go. In most places you have two or three providers if that. I live in Chicago and were I live I only have three crappy choices AT&T, Comcast and Clear. I hope Google expands the Fiber service nationwide soon, and hopefully it will drive the price down of everyone else.

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
93. Many years ago in a land far away, competition meant better service ...
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 02:26 AM
Feb 2013

Basically this is a myth perpetrated by supply side economically thinking people ...

Unfortunately we have moved way past this paradigm and have entered into the millisecond paradigm ...

bonniebgood

(943 posts)
65. Its the future of this "Exceptional America" where Our Government
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 10:38 AM
Feb 2013

allow private cooperations to control the public interest for profit. Why would one need INTERNET when the politician/cooperations want Get rid of Dept of Education, EPA, Post Office
and All communication between the people who pays for it? Three students neighbors stopped by my house to use my computer to fill out an 'online' application for fucking McDonald's.

You need a damn computer to sign a petition. In order to sign a petition one need to "create an account" with a password.
30mb speed in Alabama and we pay a bundle. I cant afford it yet i could not survive here without it. I need Charter to do research for my job and Verizion via smartphone to stream progressive radio cost me over 250.00 per month.
What a fucking rip-off. F the corporate Clintons. It might take 30 years to undo Glass Stegal, 1996 telecommunication act
and NAFTA.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
67. Change "Internet Access" to "Health Care" and you have the same story
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 11:06 AM
Feb 2013

everything is the US has been handed over to a very few blood-sucking 1%ers who are beyond any laws. I am optimistic that before I shuffle off we will have our revenge

Grantuspeace

(873 posts)
68. We have been paying an extra $10 a month to use our fancy 4g phones on a 3g network.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 11:29 AM
Feb 2013

We have been told 4g service is under construction and just around the corner for years. And if we are lucky enough to have a 4g network, many carriers throttle speeds as data usage increases. We are all getting screwed.

Gin

(7,212 posts)
69. I thought all those xtra fees
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 11:29 AM
Feb 2013

I paid over the years were to bring access to rural areas. Guess its another revenue source we suckers provide thinking its actually going to help folks in rural areas get connected.

 

tclark0404

(24 posts)
72. Small Town Iowa
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 12:07 PM
Feb 2013

Terril Iowa. I pay $172.03 a month which includes phone service and basic cable package (HD included).

mikeysnot

(4,757 posts)
73. I recommend David Kay Johnson's book Fine Print
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 12:49 PM
Feb 2013

Chapter five - "In twenty-ninth place and fading fast"..

We are being screwed by the telecons and politicons.

Privatized profits, socialized costs.

Response to marmar (Original post)

hunter

(38,322 posts)
83. Oh, I'd love to.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 04:02 PM
Feb 2013

Maybe on those public airwaves our dear leaders sold to AT&T, Verizon, and other corporate giants.

Personally, I think the Federal Government should nationalize these bastards and blanket the nation with free high speed wireless internet.

It would be pretty much the same economic model as our highway and road system.

Corporations would make money selling infrastructure and internet devices, not by renting bandwidth to users, in the same way that corporations make money bidding and contracting for highway and road infrastructure and selling cars.

me b zola

(19,053 posts)
77. I think sometimes my posts come across as anti-technology
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 01:53 PM
Feb 2013

...when in fact I'm concerned that without pubic discussion about new technologies and how they impact our lives, these advances will work to widen the gap between the haves and have-nots.

I am pro technology and advancement in general. I just want everybody included.

emmadoggy

(2,142 posts)
79. Small town, Iowa.
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 02:17 PM
Feb 2013

[URL=http://www.speedtest.net][IMG][/IMG][/URL]


Paying for 7m service. This is as close as I usually get. I pay roughly $80/month for phone (local & long distance) and internet. Internet accounts for roughly $25 of that amount.




 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
81. Couple this with the fact...
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 02:28 PM
Feb 2013

that we are breaking primary education by defunding it, and putting secondary education out of the reach of most people due to cost. Then toss in a big helping of the rise of religion, and we are heading back to the dark ages.

phylny

(8,383 posts)
92. I live in rural Virginia, and this is the absolute best I can do. As you can see, it sucks.
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:17 AM
Feb 2013

[link:|

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bill Moyers: Why U.S. Int...