Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Are Conservatives Trying to Destroy the Voting Rights Act?
The current campaign against the VRA is the result of three key factors: a whiter, more Southern, more conservative GOP that has responded to demographic change by trying to suppress an increasingly diverse electorate; a twenty-five-year effort to gut the VRA by conservative intellectuals, who in recent years have received millions of dollars from top right-wing funders, including Charles Koch; and a reactionary Supreme Court that does not support remedies to racial discrimination.
The push by conservatives to repeal Section 5 comes on the heels of what NAACP president Benjamin Jealous has called the greatest attacks on voting rights since segregation. After the 2010 election, GOP officials approved laws in more than a dozen states to restrict the right to vote by requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote, shutting down voter registration drives, curtailing early voting, disenfranchising ex-felons and mandating government-issued photo IDs to cast a ballotall of which disproportionately target communities of color. The states covered by Section 5 were significantly more likely to pass such laws than those that are not.
Attorney General Eric Holder has called Section 5 the keystone of our voting rights, and the Justice Department and voting rights groups have argued that it is an essential tool for dismantling barriers to the ballot box. The record compiled by Congress demonstrates that, without the continuation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 protections, racial and language minority citizens will be deprived of the opportunity to exercise their right to vote, or will have their votes diluted, undermining the significant gains made by minorities in the last forty years, Congress stated in reauthorizing the act in 2006. The disappearance of Section 5 would be a devastating setback for voting rightsakin to the way the Citizens United decision eviscerated campaign finance regulationand would greenlight the kind of voter suppression attempts that proved so unpopular in 2012.
Overturning Section 5 is in many respects the most important battle in the GOPs war on voting. As Holder noted in a recent speech, there have been more lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of Section 5 over the past two years than during the previous four decades. Section 5 is in the gravest danger at a moment in contemporary history when its needed the most.
The push by conservatives to repeal Section 5 comes on the heels of what NAACP president Benjamin Jealous has called the greatest attacks on voting rights since segregation. After the 2010 election, GOP officials approved laws in more than a dozen states to restrict the right to vote by requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote, shutting down voter registration drives, curtailing early voting, disenfranchising ex-felons and mandating government-issued photo IDs to cast a ballotall of which disproportionately target communities of color. The states covered by Section 5 were significantly more likely to pass such laws than those that are not.
Attorney General Eric Holder has called Section 5 the keystone of our voting rights, and the Justice Department and voting rights groups have argued that it is an essential tool for dismantling barriers to the ballot box. The record compiled by Congress demonstrates that, without the continuation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 protections, racial and language minority citizens will be deprived of the opportunity to exercise their right to vote, or will have their votes diluted, undermining the significant gains made by minorities in the last forty years, Congress stated in reauthorizing the act in 2006. The disappearance of Section 5 would be a devastating setback for voting rightsakin to the way the Citizens United decision eviscerated campaign finance regulationand would greenlight the kind of voter suppression attempts that proved so unpopular in 2012.
Overturning Section 5 is in many respects the most important battle in the GOPs war on voting. As Holder noted in a recent speech, there have been more lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of Section 5 over the past two years than during the previous four decades. Section 5 is in the gravest danger at a moment in contemporary history when its needed the most.
MORE...
http://www.thenation.com/article/172685/why-are-conservatives-trying-destroy-voting-rights-act#
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 765 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Are Conservatives Trying to Destroy the Voting Rights Act? (Original Post)
ProfessionalLeftist
Feb 2013
OP
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)1. Suppressing the vote by intimidation, alcohol, caging and law
has always been the only way they can win.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)3. You left out stealing elections.
Things like switching votes, stuffin' ballot boxes, and a whole lot of tactics need to be added to your very short list.
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)4. You can add that to the mix
And I sure there's more-this lot is very imaginative when it comes to this kind of stuff.
riqster
(13,986 posts)2. They are trying to re-write the Constitution
There has always been argument over who gets to vote: this is another attempt by the "limited franchise" crowd. Damn them.