Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 09:55 AM Feb 2013

First U.S. City Passes Anti-Drone Resolution


February 5th, 2013 12:44 AM
First U.S. City Passes Anti-Drone Resolution

By David Swanson


Shortly after 11 p.m. on Monday, February 4th, the City Council of Charlottesville, Va., passed what is believed to be the first anti-drone resolution in the country. According to my notes, and verifiable soon on the City Council's website, the resolution reads:

WHEREAS, the rapid implementation of drone technology throughout the United States poses a serious threat to the privacy and constitutional rights of the American people, including the residents of Charlottesville; and

WHEREAS, the federal government and the Commonwealth of Virginia have thus far failed to provide reasonable legal restrictions on the use of drones within the United States; and

WHEREAS, police departments throughout the country have begun implementing drone technology absent any guidance or guidelines from law makers;

NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED, that the City Council of Charlottesville, Virginia, endorses the proposal for a two year moratorium on drones in the state of Virginia; and calls on the United States Congress and the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia to adopt legislation prohibiting information obtained from the domestic use of drones from being introduced into a Federal or State court, and precluding the domestic use of drones equipped with anti-personnel devices, meaning any projectile, chemical, electrical, directed-energy (visible or invisible), or other device designed to harm, incapacitate, or otherwise negatively impact a human being; and pledges to abstain from similar uses with city-owned, leased, or borrowed drones.


The same City Council passed a resolution on January 17, 2012, calling for an end to drone wars, as well as ground wars, excessive military spending, and any possible attack on Iran. ....................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-friends-blog/first-us-city-passes-anti-drone-resolution



29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
First U.S. City Passes Anti-Drone Resolution (Original Post) marmar Feb 2013 OP
send in the troops, these unpatriotic fools need a reminder of who is in charge! quinnox Feb 2013 #1
Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #2
What is with Southern Poverty Law Center? sadalien Feb 2013 #5
Power corrupts. Cynicus Emeritus Feb 2013 #12
Why attack the SPLC? marmar Feb 2013 #6
My question exactly. Solly Mack Feb 2013 #16
Does this even matter since the federal government has sole control over air space in the US? cstanleytech Feb 2013 #3
Since they're just asking for higher levels of government to think about it... bobclark86 Feb 2013 #15
What does that mean? DeadEyeDyck Feb 2013 #17
Oh? I didnt realize that the info at cstanleytech Feb 2013 #21
They beat Takoma Park, MD to it..... Burma Jones Feb 2013 #4
Will tinfoil hats be subsidized? nt EastKYLiberal Feb 2013 #7
No, just Authoritarians & Their Admirers gatherings..... marmar Feb 2013 #8
Clearly a snub at Administration drone policy... Earth_First Feb 2013 #9
First State to regulate its own Militia and any other state's militia in its ground or air space. DhhD Feb 2013 #10
IMO, unless the Federal Government is at war with Virginia, then the 2nd Amendment over DhhD Feb 2013 #11
Good! And may the rest follow. n/t Catherina Feb 2013 #13
Hear hear for a growing pushback against the unconscionable. nt woo me with science Feb 2013 #24
Analogous to responses to TPA described here. proverbialwisdom Feb 2013 #14
Thanks for the post Cynicus Emeritus Feb 2013 #18
A city council passes a resolution affecting the entire state of Virginia? I don't think so. randome Feb 2013 #19
A municipality takes a stance sadalien Feb 2013 #20
they are endorsing a proposal.. so no they are not trying to effect the entire commonwealth SQUEE Feb 2013 #22
"Attention getting"? Definitely! woo me with science Feb 2013 #26
^ Wilms Feb 2013 #23
Thank you marions ghost Feb 2013 #25
I love the way Michael phrased that. woo me with science Feb 2013 #27
Anti-government kookism mwrguy Feb 2013 #28
kick woo me with science Feb 2013 #29
 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
1. send in the troops, these unpatriotic fools need a reminder of who is in charge!
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 10:03 AM
Feb 2013

How dare they? Drones are a useful tool to spy on Americans, I mean terrorists, and all good and loyal citizens would never object to their use.

Response to marmar (Original post)

 

sadalien

(62 posts)
5. What is with Southern Poverty Law Center?
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 10:44 AM
Feb 2013

I used to think they were a good organization but then I started hearing grumblings from some on the left about it.

 

Cynicus Emeritus

(172 posts)
12. Power corrupts.
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 11:22 AM
Feb 2013

SPLC has done good things. That said they are typically at point pushing a philosophy and pulling strings that all Americans are potentially guilty, need watched and encourage expansion of surveillance. I call the latter views very un-American whether they be proposed by SPLC or Joe McCarthy.

Progressive, populist, libertarian for individual civil rights

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
15. Since they're just asking for higher levels of government to think about it...
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 11:49 AM
Feb 2013

and not actually banning anything, then it might. You know, get some media attention and some pressure on Congress to do SOMETHING about this.

But on it's own, it's just posturing. We need deeds to back up words.

DeadEyeDyck

(1,504 posts)
17. What does that mean?
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 12:53 PM
Feb 2013

I am a pilot. As far as airspace, most people live in Class G or uncontrolled airspace. That goes up to 14500 agl.
What airspace are you referring to?

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
9. Clearly a snub at Administration drone policy...
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 11:13 AM
Feb 2013

Or some here at DU would have you believe anyways.

Bravo, Charlottesville!

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
11. IMO, unless the Federal Government is at war with Virginia, then the 2nd Amendment over
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 11:19 AM
Feb 2013

powers the Patriot Act with regards to drones.

 

Cynicus Emeritus

(172 posts)
18. Thanks for the post
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 02:20 PM
Feb 2013

Political power needs to move in both directions...bottom up and top down. That's what gives us balance. As long as cities and individuals fear not expressing their beliefs we still have a democracy. These kinds of resolutions get more attention from our elected representatives than a constituent phone call or email. I'm a big fan of grass roots politics.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
19. A city council passes a resolution affecting the entire state of Virginia? I don't think so.
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 02:27 PM
Feb 2013

This is just attention-getting nonsense.

SQUEE

(1,315 posts)
22. they are endorsing a proposal.. so no they are not trying to effect the entire commonwealth
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 08:03 PM
Feb 2013

As an earlier poster said, governance comes from bottom up as well as top down. Good on the council.
And as for "attention getting nonsense", the more attention this gets the better.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
26. "Attention getting"? Definitely!
Tue Feb 5, 2013, 10:28 PM
Feb 2013

...as protest of political acts that are unconscionable *should* be.


Nonsense? Hardly!
Good for Charlottesville, and may many, many more follow suit!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»First U.S. City Passes An...