Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFilibuster reform dead until at least 2015
Filibuster reform dead until at least 2015
By Steve Benen
As expected, the weak, watered-down filibuster reform plan that does not actually reform the filibuster was easily approved by the Senate last night, 78 to 16. Some of the Democrats who took the lead in pushing for bolder changes, including Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Tom Udall (D-N.M.), grudgingly went along, knowing it was this or nothing.
But once it became clear that the measure would pass, reformers tried to put a positive spin on the developments. This package fell far short of expectations, they said, but if these minor changes fail to improve matters, and the Senate remains a dysfunctional mess, Democrats can and will return to the issue and push for more sweeping improvements.
But if reformers are hoping to get another bite at this apple, they should know they'll have to wait until 2015, at the earliest. Sahil Kapur reported this morning that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) promised Republicans "he will not seek to make any further changes to the filibuster or other rules in the 113th Congress without Republican consent."
In other words, the "constitutional option" (or "nuclear option" is off the table for at least two years. Though Senate Republicans originally considered making these changes mid-year when the strategy was proposed during the Bush/Cheney era, Reid has ruled out unilateral action -- telling Republicans that no matter how much they abuse the rules, and no matter how severe their knee-jerk obstructionism becomes, Democrats won't do anything about it except complain. If Democrats even try to come up with improvements, Reid has agreed to get the Minority Leader's permission first -- and McConnell will say no.
- more -
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/01/25/16696335-filibuster-reform-dead-until-at-least-2015
By Steve Benen
As expected, the weak, watered-down filibuster reform plan that does not actually reform the filibuster was easily approved by the Senate last night, 78 to 16. Some of the Democrats who took the lead in pushing for bolder changes, including Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Tom Udall (D-N.M.), grudgingly went along, knowing it was this or nothing.
But once it became clear that the measure would pass, reformers tried to put a positive spin on the developments. This package fell far short of expectations, they said, but if these minor changes fail to improve matters, and the Senate remains a dysfunctional mess, Democrats can and will return to the issue and push for more sweeping improvements.
But if reformers are hoping to get another bite at this apple, they should know they'll have to wait until 2015, at the earliest. Sahil Kapur reported this morning that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) promised Republicans "he will not seek to make any further changes to the filibuster or other rules in the 113th Congress without Republican consent."
"Finally," (Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell) asked, "I would confirm with the Majority Leader that the Senate would not consider other resolutions [in] relation to any standing order or rules this Congress unless they went through the regular order process?"
The Democratic leader was categorical in his response. "That is correct," Reid responded. "Any other resolutions related to Senate procedure would be subject to a regular order process including consideration by the Rules Committee."
In other words, the "constitutional option" (or "nuclear option" is off the table for at least two years. Though Senate Republicans originally considered making these changes mid-year when the strategy was proposed during the Bush/Cheney era, Reid has ruled out unilateral action -- telling Republicans that no matter how much they abuse the rules, and no matter how severe their knee-jerk obstructionism becomes, Democrats won't do anything about it except complain. If Democrats even try to come up with improvements, Reid has agreed to get the Minority Leader's permission first -- and McConnell will say no.
- more -
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/01/25/16696335-filibuster-reform-dead-until-at-least-2015
Sigh!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 881 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Filibuster reform dead until at least 2015 (Original Post)
ProSense
Jan 2013
OP
n2doc
(47,953 posts)1. So long as Reid and the rest of the senate leadership are in office, nothing will happen. n/t
rurallib
(62,444 posts)2. Harry gives Mitch the stick to beat him with.
earthside
(6,960 posts)3. And if the Repuglicans win a Senate majority in 2014?
The filibuster will be dead about 30 seconds after the new Senate convenes.
Does anyone really think they will put up with 40 Democrats blocking any legislation they want?
The only thing that Reid preserved was the Repuglicans 'tyranny of the minority' in the U.S. Senate.
libtodeath
(2,888 posts)4. This is depressing
onehandle
(51,122 posts)5. The next two to four years will be exactly the same as the last two.
Republicans are terrorists and Democrats are collaborators.
sadbear
(4,340 posts)6. Here's the kicker:
Most people are going to believe real filibuster reform has been passed and then blame Senate Democrats when nothing changes.