Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue Belle

(5,912 posts)
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 07:01 PM Jan 2013

New Mexico Bill Would Criminalize Abortions After Rape As 'Tampering With Evidence'

New Mexico Bill Would Criminalize Abortions After Rape As 'Tampering With Evidence'
Source: Huffington Post
Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/24/new-mexico-abortion-bill_n_2541894.html

A Republican lawmaker in New Mexico introduced a bill on Wednesday that would legally require victims of rape to carry their pregnancies to term in order to use the fetus as evidence for a sexual assault trial.

House Bill 206, introduced by state Rep. Cathrynn Brown (R), would charge a rape victim who ended her pregnancy with a third-degree felony for "tampering with evidence."

“Tampering with evidence shall include procuring or facilitating an abortion, or compelling or coercing another to obtain an abortion, of a fetus that is the result of criminal sexual penetration or incest with the intent to destroy evidence of the crime," the bill says.

Third-degree felonies in New Mexico carry a sentence of up to three years in prison.

Pat Davis of ProgressNow New Mexico, a progressive nonprofit opposing the bill, called it "blatantly unconstitutional" on Thursday.

“The bill turns victims of rape and incest into felons and forces them to become incubators of evidence for the state,” he said. “According to Republican philosophy, victims who are ‘legitimately raped’ will now have to carry the fetus to term in order to prove their case.“
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Mexico Bill Would Criminalize Abortions After Rape As 'Tampering With Evidence' (Original Post) Blue Belle Jan 2013 OP
Then how do we prove Politicalboi Jan 2013 #1
Thank you! Blue Belle Jan 2013 #5
Abort the GOP. JaneyVee Jan 2013 #2
Will the state then take possession of the fetus after it is born and care for it for 18 years? tanyev Jan 2013 #3
This bill is blowing up in Brown's face... Archae Jan 2013 #4
Um...yeah, sure Cathrynn Brown... PossumSqueezins Jan 2013 #12
Holy sick fuck!!! NutmegYankee Jan 2013 #6
Yeah... Blue Belle Jan 2013 #7
One doesn't need a baby to prove rape. This woman is SICK AND EVIL; AKA, a Republican. WinkyDink Jan 2013 #8
She must hail from an extremely red district to even have the stones to introduce this bill. nt Selatius Jan 2013 #9
This will learn them wommin not to git rapedededed PossumSqueezins Jan 2013 #10
Just when you think you've heard it all..... davidn3600 Jan 2013 #11
 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
1. Then how do we prove
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 07:05 PM
Jan 2013

Un-legitimate rapes if the woman doesn't get pregnant.

This bill by a woman too boot.

Do the babies stay in evidence once they are born? LOL! Sealed in a manila envelope in a tub in downtown. How can the mother handle the evidence and then bring it to trial?

Archae

(46,333 posts)
4. This bill is blowing up in Brown's face...
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 07:14 PM
Jan 2013

So she's backpedaling furiously.


State Rep. Cathrynn Brown, sponsor of an anti-abortion bill that she called poorly written, said her intent was not to charge rape victims with a felony if they terminated their pregnancy.

Brown, R-Carlsbad, said her bill was badly drafted and that she did not catch the language problems when reviewing it.

"I missed this one," she said Thursday.

Her proposal, House Bill 206, says: "Tampering with evidence shall include procuring or facilitating an abortion, or compelling or coercing another to obtain an abortion, of a fetus that is the result of criminal sexual penetration or incest with the intent to destroy evidence of the crime."

Rep. Nate Gentry, R-Albuquerque, said Brown's intent was to focus on a perpetrator, such as a stepfather who raped a teen, impregnated her and then demanded that she get an abortion.

http://elpasotimes.typepad.com/newmexico/2013/01/a-media-storm-for-rep-brown.html

PossumSqueezins

(184 posts)
12. Um...yeah, sure Cathrynn Brown...
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 11:55 PM
Jan 2013

She obviously doesn't take this legislatin' thing too seriously since she can't even read her own bills for language.

Blue Belle

(5,912 posts)
7. Yeah...
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 08:34 PM
Jan 2013

I ask the same thing about Michelle Bachman. Hopefully her actions will be what votes her out in the next election.

PossumSqueezins

(184 posts)
10. This will learn them wommin not to git rapedededed
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 11:47 PM
Jan 2013

Wow. The Repukes just keep outstupiding themselves.

I am wondering, since the child is now "evidence", if it will be labeled as "Exhibit A" and kept in a file cabinet.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Mexico Bill Would Cri...