Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 03:16 AM Jan 2013

What do the 'pugs think SHOULD have been done after Bengazi? Did they have ANY ideas?

Did they want us to bomb Libya back to the Stone Age? Reanimate Khadaffi? Restore EVERY deposed tyrant in the region?

And what difference do they think it would have made to declare the attacks terrorism any earlier than they were?

Do they honestly think this would have made a difference in the situation on the ground?

Or do they just think Mittens was entitled to get a boost in the polls from those deaths? And are they really that certain he WOULD have got that boost(couldn't a declaration of the killings being "a terrorist act" equally have led to a "rally 'round the flag" boost for Obama?)

Their sanctimony would be a little less nauseating if only they had actually proposed SOME other ideas about this at the time.

Any chance they'll just come out and actually SAY what it is they want here?

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What do the 'pugs think SHOULD have been done after Bengazi? Did they have ANY ideas? (Original Post) Ken Burch Jan 2013 OP
Yellow cake. Glassunion Jan 2013 #1
Easy - elect Mitt Romney jberryhill Jan 2013 #2
It's all about the political theater... cynatnite Jan 2013 #3
They were simply trying to create a scandal, that's their whole purpose with this. Lil Missy Jan 2013 #4
attack Iran ? JI7 Jan 2013 #5
If you watch the video of Hillary Clinton on September 12, 2012, JDPriestly Jan 2013 #6
What they wanted? moondust Jan 2013 #7
Republicans wanted to go all WMD. But.... Berlum Jan 2013 #8

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
3. It's all about the political theater...
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 03:22 AM
Jan 2013

and not a real attempt to make sure this never happens again.

They're going to milk it for all it's worth in an attempt to get at Obama. They don't give a shit about the victims and their families.

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
4. They were simply trying to create a scandal, that's their whole purpose with this.
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 03:27 AM
Jan 2013

And it's not working.

JI7

(89,250 posts)
5. attack Iran ?
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 03:28 AM
Jan 2013

or some other country or place or anything else which had nothing to do with the attack ?

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
6. If you watch the video of Hillary Clinton on September 12, 2012,
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 03:40 AM
Jan 2013

you learn that she described the event as a "heavily armed attack."

What is unclear about that? Seems to me she was talking about terrorism.

What they didn't know then and haven't said they know now is who did it. And there were at the same time demonstrations against that movie -- in Cairo, for example.

Isn't the matter of who did what still being investigated?

What I want to know is why our ambassador and the Turkish ambassador met in Benghazi. Our Embassy is in Tripoli. Benghazi is way far from Tripoli and very near the Egyptian border. Why did they meet there? Was the Turkish ambassador somehow involved in the matter? Turkey is supposed to be our ally. But how did the attackers know that Stevens was in our consulate? Who told them? Or did they not know?

moondust

(19,988 posts)
7. What they wanted?
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 04:19 AM
Jan 2013

They wanted to do as much damage as possible to the political careers of both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. It didn't work. Game over. Complete waste of time and tax dollars reminiscent of Kenneth Starr's crusade.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What do the 'pugs think S...