General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt's nothing but terrorism.
The average citizen is not safe walking the streets of this country. A young man in Philadelphia has a greater chance of being killed than a young man in Afghanistan, it was reported.
They (gunowners) want people to fear them. That is the definition of terrorism. You might go to the mall and see a couple of nuts walking around with assault weapons. That should not be lawful.
We are losing our freedom to these screamers about the 2nd Amendment. Their fallacious arguments about the 2nd Amendment should be taken to the Supreme Court and declared illegal. We have a right to walk the streets in safety - without fear.
livetohike
(22,165 posts)They made many poor souls so fearful, they are afraid to leave their homes unarmed less a "terrist" jump them from behind. I can't believe we survived those miserable eight years.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)They have resisted just about every piece of gun control legislation, resulting in a flood of weapons on our streets.
livetohike
(22,165 posts)in my opinion. It's much easier to control people when they are afraid.
gateley
(62,683 posts)(no pun intended)
livetohike
(22,165 posts)anything else that makes them feel safe, although I can't think of what that might be. Oh, maybe stocking up for Y2K.
gateley
(62,683 posts)but the other day I was in a grocery store (a grocery store!) and I heard a couple of people arguing pretty heatedly. To my surprise, the thought "I wonder if one of them is armed" came into my head and I started looking around for a place to cower if need be.
It is heartbreaking it's come to this.
Today's incident shows how dangerous firearms can be when one is allowed to carry (or in this case, NOT allowed to carry on campus). We've all been "blinded by rage" and we literally can't think logically when we're gripped by it. The result too often can be what transpired today.
I don't know what the answer is. There are too many people who are "responsible" and wouldn't carry a firearm anywhere and have the right to have them for self protection, collecting, whatever. And then there are people like the guy who went to J C Penney armed to the teeth.
It's becoming surreal.
EarthWindFire
(84 posts)are you losing exactly.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)How can anyone not be fearful when they see a total stranger with an assault weapon strapped on his shoulder? That is terroristic threatening at the least.
EarthWindFire
(84 posts)but there is no such thing as a freedom from the burden of fear. It does not exist...however there is a freedom to own firearms.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
EarthWindFire
(84 posts)in Order to form a more perfect Union-to make everything in our country as perfect as possible
establish Justice-begin fairness for all
insure domestic Tranquility-promise that everything in our country will be peaceful
provide for the common defence-give protection to everyone
promote the general Welfare-care for those in need
and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity-make sure freedom and fairness continues for ourselves and all our children and our children's children and every generation to come,
do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.-approve of and begin the Constitution of the US
SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)"The fourth is freedom from fear, which, translated into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor -- anywhere in the world."
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)That "freedom" is, and should be, heavily regulated.
No matter how "powerful" your little Precious makes you feel. And I, and sane people like me, are fucking sick of fucking gun humpers and their Rambo fantasies making this country an unsafe place to live.
EarthWindFire
(84 posts)maybe you should stop stereotyping all gun owners as having that mind set... Stereotypes are bad in all forms, but I guess you believe it is okay when you stereotype but have problems when others do so.
theKed
(1,235 posts)There are millions of people who would drive everyday in a safe and responsible manner, and yet we require testing, licensing, and registration. There may be millions of people that own guns and would never handle them in dangerous, irresponsible ways, but laws are made to handle the worst cases. And those laws are past due on firearms.
EarthWindFire
(84 posts)With anything u have said, but what pisses me off are these people here on DU that act as if anyone who defends gun ownership deserves to be labeled using those idiotic stereotypes.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)They are scum.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)That is not very nice when most I have seen on this board are trying to help. You may not like the gun owners viewpoint and I do not care for the ban all guns viewpoint. However I do not have to get down to name calling as happens regularly here.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Kentuck did not advocate the ban all guns viewpoint. He specifically addressed people who defend assault weapons.
With or without name calling, distorting someone else's position is not helpful.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)But he did address me as I defend the right to own semi-automatic rifles. It is very hard to defend assault-weapons because everybody has a different definition of them. I guess in the strict sense, Kentuck may not mean me as I have no idea what his definition is. Going by the Connecticut law, the weapon used in Newtown was not considered an assault weapon. And it definitely was not an assault rifle.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Speaking for myself, I'd call an assault weapon anything other than the basic shotgun or rifle I used for hunting when young. Military-style knockoffs, large clips, rapid-fire, semi-automatic, whatever...I don't like them and like handguns I don't see the point except to kill people.
If you feel the need to own these, or any guns, that's your business/problem. Why it should be mine, or anyone's, is the issue. I'm open to discussion, but IMHO responsible gun owners should start acting responsibly and figuring out how to decrease the mayhem.
And saying that most gun owners are responsible isn't good enough.
Never defended anyone owning assault weapons!
indepat
(20,899 posts)to our country, its people and government, greater than the threat posed by Islamic terrorists. Does anyone really wonder what the Republican-controlled House of Representatives will do with respect to gun control legislation, if this domestic right-wing group fits the description of extremist?
Just how many "total stranger with an assault weapon strapped on his shoulder" have you actually seen walking down the street? Not a youtube video but actually seen in person?
I have never seen anyone other than LEO with an assault weapon in a public place (other than sporting events and shooting ranges). Do you also live in fear of being struck by lighting or shark attack?
indepat
(20,899 posts)to the right of others to pack assault weapons of mass carnage on their hips. The Republican-controlled House of Representative will surely either refute or confirm my assertion.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Their definition of tyranny simply seems to be "not able to own any ol' gun they want."
Seems to me they could spend their energy a lot more productively.
OneTenthofOnePercent
(6,268 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)I do know that the average citizen certainly is much safer walking down the street now than ever before.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Unintentional injury is the leading cause of death for people from young childhood into their mid-40s. As causes of death go, homicide is small potatoes compared to a lot of other things, many of which can be mitigated through lifestyle choices.
According to the CDC, the top 20 leading causes of death in the USA for people of all ages from 1999 - 2010 is:
1 HeartDisease 7,878,766
2 Malignant Neoplasms 6,713,687
3 Cerebro-vascular 1,776,578
4 Chronic Low.Respiratory Disease 1,541,893
5 Unintentional Injury 1,335,667
6 Diabetes Mellitus 856,906
7 Alzheimer's Disease 799,822
8 Influenza & Pneumonia 710,486
9 Nephritis 519,680
10 Septicemia 401,715
11 Suicide 396,480
12 Liver Disease 338,196
13 Hypertension 270,369
14 Parkinson's Disease 222,005
15 Homicide 208,352
16 Pneumonitis 201,494
17 Benign Neoplasms 166,191
18 Aortic Aneurysm 162,392
19 HIV 148,197
20 Atherosclerosis 133,331
Over the course of a lifetime a person is more than three times as likely to die of influenza or pneumonia than from homicide. Within the highest-ranking cause of death, unintentional injury, motor vehicle accidents are by far the most likely cause - 36.7%, followed by poisoning at 20.5% and falls at 17.3%. Unintentional firearm injuries account for barely half of one percent of unintentional injuries.
These facts are available from the CDC on the WISQARS site. No matter how you spin the numbers, the probability of becoming a victim of a random homicide is very small. But because it makes for spectacular news reports, many people have a badly distorted perception of the danger posed by random killers.
http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html
Decoy of Fenris
(1,954 posts)The belligerence is overwhelming. It is now intimidation.