Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 03:56 PM Jan 2013

It's nothing but terrorism.

The average citizen is not safe walking the streets of this country. A young man in Philadelphia has a greater chance of being killed than a young man in Afghanistan, it was reported.

They (gunowners) want people to fear them. That is the definition of terrorism. You might go to the mall and see a couple of nuts walking around with assault weapons. That should not be lawful.

We are losing our freedom to these screamers about the 2nd Amendment. Their fallacious arguments about the 2nd Amendment should be taken to the Supreme Court and declared illegal. We have a right to walk the streets in safety - without fear.

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's nothing but terrorism. (Original Post) kentuck Jan 2013 OP
I blame the "Reign of Terror" Bush-Cheney 2001-2008 livetohike Jan 2013 #1
I also blame the NRA Hugabear Jan 2013 #2
Me too. The NRA are the tools of Bush-Cheney and everyone else who wants a nation of fearful cowards livetohike Jan 2013 #5
The RW (NRA lapdogs) are still beating the Fear drum! Incidents like this give them ammo gateley Jan 2013 #4
Yes, and people will spend money they don't have for guns if they are afraid, or money for livetohike Jan 2013 #6
I've been a supporter of an individual's right to own guns (although don't own any myself) gateley Jan 2013 #3
what freedom EarthWindFire Jan 2013 #7
Freedom from fear. kentuck Jan 2013 #8
I understand your view EarthWindFire Jan 2013 #9
How do you interpret this little preamble? kentuck Jan 2013 #11
like this EarthWindFire Jan 2013 #13
It's one of FDR's Four Freedoms. SwankyXomb Jan 2013 #16
No, there isn't a "freedom to own firearms". Zoeisright Jan 2013 #20
well EarthWindFire Jan 2013 #21
Laws are built on the worst offenders. theKed Jan 2013 #22
I do not disagree EarthWindFire Jan 2013 #23
People that defend assault weapons are no better than terrorists. kentuck Jan 2013 #25
been called worse Duckhunter935 Jan 2013 #26
You are pushing a straw man argument. truebluegreen Jan 2013 #28
Kentuck may not Duckhunter935 Jan 2013 #30
So here we are, bogged down in definitions. truebluegreen Jan 2013 #32
I EarthWindFire Jan 2013 #31
A 2009 DHS report identified domestic right-wing extremist groups as the greatest threat to indepat Jan 2013 #12
Question guardian Jan 2013 #17
But, but, in a right-wing-soused society, all other rights in the Bill of Rights are subordinated indepat Jan 2013 #10
True. And why is it the 2nd Amendment is the only one they care about? truebluegreen Jan 2013 #29
Despite false perceptions driven by a violence-addicted media... OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #14
I haven't been to Philadelphia for quite some time, but I'm rather skeptical of that claim. Egalitarian Thug Jan 2013 #15
The human mind as shipped is poorly equipped to comprehend probability, especially when it is low slackmaster Jan 2013 #18
IIRC, you have higher odds of being hit by a meteor and surviving than shot dead. n/t Decoy of Fenris Jan 2013 #27
Yes! KT2000 Jan 2013 #19
They are America's version of suicide bombers. n/t Moses2SandyKoufax Jan 2013 #24

livetohike

(22,165 posts)
1. I blame the "Reign of Terror" Bush-Cheney 2001-2008
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 03:58 PM
Jan 2013

They made many poor souls so fearful, they are afraid to leave their homes unarmed less a "terrist" jump them from behind. I can't believe we survived those miserable eight years.

Hugabear

(10,340 posts)
2. I also blame the NRA
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 04:00 PM
Jan 2013

They have resisted just about every piece of gun control legislation, resulting in a flood of weapons on our streets.

livetohike

(22,165 posts)
5. Me too. The NRA are the tools of Bush-Cheney and everyone else who wants a nation of fearful cowards
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 04:06 PM
Jan 2013

in my opinion. It's much easier to control people when they are afraid.

gateley

(62,683 posts)
4. The RW (NRA lapdogs) are still beating the Fear drum! Incidents like this give them ammo
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 04:03 PM
Jan 2013

(no pun intended)

livetohike

(22,165 posts)
6. Yes, and people will spend money they don't have for guns if they are afraid, or money for
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 04:08 PM
Jan 2013

anything else that makes them feel safe, although I can't think of what that might be. Oh, maybe stocking up for Y2K.

gateley

(62,683 posts)
3. I've been a supporter of an individual's right to own guns (although don't own any myself)
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 04:02 PM
Jan 2013

but the other day I was in a grocery store (a grocery store!) and I heard a couple of people arguing pretty heatedly. To my surprise, the thought "I wonder if one of them is armed" came into my head and I started looking around for a place to cower if need be.

It is heartbreaking it's come to this.

Today's incident shows how dangerous firearms can be when one is allowed to carry (or in this case, NOT allowed to carry on campus). We've all been "blinded by rage" and we literally can't think logically when we're gripped by it. The result too often can be what transpired today.

I don't know what the answer is. There are too many people who are "responsible" and wouldn't carry a firearm anywhere and have the right to have them for self protection, collecting, whatever. And then there are people like the guy who went to J C Penney armed to the teeth.

It's becoming surreal.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
8. Freedom from fear.
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 04:19 PM
Jan 2013

How can anyone not be fearful when they see a total stranger with an assault weapon strapped on his shoulder? That is terroristic threatening at the least.

 

EarthWindFire

(84 posts)
9. I understand your view
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 04:22 PM
Jan 2013

but there is no such thing as a freedom from the burden of fear. It does not exist...however there is a freedom to own firearms.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
11. How do you interpret this little preamble?
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 04:29 PM
Jan 2013

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

 

EarthWindFire

(84 posts)
13. like this
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 04:49 PM
Jan 2013
We the People of the United States-all citizens of the US

in Order to form a more perfect Union-to make everything in our country as perfect as possible

establish Justice-begin fairness for all

insure domestic Tranquility-promise that everything in our country will be peaceful

provide for the common defence-give protection to everyone

promote the general Welfare-care for those in need

and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity-make sure freedom and fairness continues for ourselves and all our children and our children's children and every generation to come,

do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.-approve of and begin the Constitution of the US

SwankyXomb

(2,030 posts)
16. It's one of FDR's Four Freedoms.
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 06:15 PM
Jan 2013

"The fourth is freedom from fear, which, translated into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor -- anywhere in the world."

Zoeisright

(8,339 posts)
20. No, there isn't a "freedom to own firearms".
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 06:32 PM
Jan 2013

That "freedom" is, and should be, heavily regulated.

No matter how "powerful" your little Precious makes you feel. And I, and sane people like me, are fucking sick of fucking gun humpers and their Rambo fantasies making this country an unsafe place to live.

 

EarthWindFire

(84 posts)
21. well
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 06:36 PM
Jan 2013

maybe you should stop stereotyping all gun owners as having that mind set... Stereotypes are bad in all forms, but I guess you believe it is okay when you stereotype but have problems when others do so.

theKed

(1,235 posts)
22. Laws are built on the worst offenders.
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 07:38 PM
Jan 2013

There are millions of people who would drive everyday in a safe and responsible manner, and yet we require testing, licensing, and registration. There may be millions of people that own guns and would never handle them in dangerous, irresponsible ways, but laws are made to handle the worst cases. And those laws are past due on firearms.

 

EarthWindFire

(84 posts)
23. I do not disagree
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 09:03 PM
Jan 2013

With anything u have said, but what pisses me off are these people here on DU that act as if anyone who defends gun ownership deserves to be labeled using those idiotic stereotypes.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
26. been called worse
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 10:01 PM
Jan 2013

That is not very nice when most I have seen on this board are trying to help. You may not like the gun owners viewpoint and I do not care for the ban all guns viewpoint. However I do not have to get down to name calling as happens regularly here.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
28. You are pushing a straw man argument.
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 10:10 PM
Jan 2013

Kentuck did not advocate the ban all guns viewpoint. He specifically addressed people who defend assault weapons.

With or without name calling, distorting someone else's position is not helpful.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
30. Kentuck may not
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 10:31 PM
Jan 2013

But he did address me as I defend the right to own semi-automatic rifles. It is very hard to defend assault-weapons because everybody has a different definition of them. I guess in the strict sense, Kentuck may not mean me as I have no idea what his definition is. Going by the Connecticut law, the weapon used in Newtown was not considered an assault weapon. And it definitely was not an assault rifle.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
32. So here we are, bogged down in definitions.
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 11:27 PM
Jan 2013

Speaking for myself, I'd call an assault weapon anything other than the basic shotgun or rifle I used for hunting when young. Military-style knockoffs, large clips, rapid-fire, semi-automatic, whatever...I don't like them and like handguns I don't see the point except to kill people.

If you feel the need to own these, or any guns, that's your business/problem. Why it should be mine, or anyone's, is the issue. I'm open to discussion, but IMHO responsible gun owners should start acting responsibly and figuring out how to decrease the mayhem.

And saying that most gun owners are responsible isn't good enough.


indepat

(20,899 posts)
12. A 2009 DHS report identified domestic right-wing extremist groups as the greatest threat to
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 04:36 PM
Jan 2013

to our country, its people and government, greater than the threat posed by Islamic terrorists. Does anyone really wonder what the Republican-controlled House of Representatives will do with respect to gun control legislation, if this domestic right-wing group fits the description of extremist?

 

guardian

(2,282 posts)
17. Question
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 06:23 PM
Jan 2013

Just how many "total stranger with an assault weapon strapped on his shoulder" have you actually seen walking down the street? Not a youtube video but actually seen in person?

I have never seen anyone other than LEO with an assault weapon in a public place (other than sporting events and shooting ranges). Do you also live in fear of being struck by lighting or shark attack?

indepat

(20,899 posts)
10. But, but, in a right-wing-soused society, all other rights in the Bill of Rights are subordinated
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 04:26 PM
Jan 2013

to the right of others to pack assault weapons of mass carnage on their hips. The Republican-controlled House of Representative will surely either refute or confirm my assertion.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
29. True. And why is it the 2nd Amendment is the only one they care about?
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 10:13 PM
Jan 2013

Their definition of tyranny simply seems to be "not able to own any ol' gun they want."



Seems to me they could spend their energy a lot more productively.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
15. I haven't been to Philadelphia for quite some time, but I'm rather skeptical of that claim.
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 05:45 PM
Jan 2013

I do know that the average citizen certainly is much safer walking down the street now than ever before.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
18. The human mind as shipped is poorly equipped to comprehend probability, especially when it is low
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 06:27 PM
Jan 2013

Unintentional injury is the leading cause of death for people from young childhood into their mid-40s. As causes of death go, homicide is small potatoes compared to a lot of other things, many of which can be mitigated through lifestyle choices.

According to the CDC, the top 20 leading causes of death in the USA for people of all ages from 1999 - 2010 is:

1 HeartDisease 7,878,766
2 Malignant Neoplasms 6,713,687
3 Cerebro-vascular 1,776,578
4 Chronic Low.Respiratory Disease 1,541,893
5 Unintentional Injury 1,335,667
6 Diabetes Mellitus 856,906
7 Alzheimer's Disease 799,822
8 Influenza & Pneumonia 710,486
9 Nephritis 519,680
10 Septicemia 401,715
11 Suicide 396,480
12 Liver Disease 338,196
13 Hypertension 270,369
14 Parkinson's Disease 222,005
15 Homicide 208,352
16 Pneumonitis 201,494
17 Benign Neoplasms 166,191
18 Aortic Aneurysm 162,392
19 HIV 148,197
20 Atherosclerosis 133,331

Over the course of a lifetime a person is more than three times as likely to die of influenza or pneumonia than from homicide. Within the highest-ranking cause of death, unintentional injury, motor vehicle accidents are by far the most likely cause - 36.7%, followed by poisoning at 20.5% and falls at 17.3%. Unintentional firearm injuries account for barely half of one percent of unintentional injuries.

These facts are available from the CDC on the WISQARS site. No matter how you spin the numbers, the probability of becoming a victim of a random homicide is very small. But because it makes for spectacular news reports, many people have a badly distorted perception of the danger posed by random killers.



http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's nothing but terroris...