Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,953 posts)
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 02:04 PM Jan 2013

NTSB rules out excess battery voltage in 787 incident

Source: Reuters

NTSB rules out excess battery voltage in 787 incident

By James Topham and Antoni Slodkowski
TOKYO/WASHINGTON | Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:55am EST

(Reuters) - The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board on Sunday ruled out excess voltage as the cause of a battery fire last month on a Boeing Co 787 Dreamliner jet operated by Japan Airlines Co (JAL) and widened its investigation to include the Arizona-based manufacturer of the battery's charger.

Last week, governments across the world grounded the Dreamliner while Boeing halted deliveries after a problem with a lithium-ion battery on a second 787 plane, flown by All Nippon Airways Co (ANA), forced the aircraft to make an emergency landing in western Japan.

"Examination of the flight recorder data from the JAL B-787 airplane indicates that the APU (auxiliary power unit) battery did not exceed its designed voltage of 32 volts," the NTSB said in a statement forwarded by a Boeing Japan representative.

On Friday, a Japanese safety official told reporters that excessive electricity may have overheated the battery in the ANA-owned Dreamliner that was forced to make the emergency landing at Japan's Takamatsu airport last week.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/20/us-boeing-ntsb-idUSBRE90J06I20130120
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NTSB rules out excess battery voltage in 787 incident (Original Post) Eugene Jan 2013 OP
Well, Boeing got one day of spin didn't they? DollarBillHines Jan 2013 #1
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NTSB rules out excess bat...