General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe President tries to educate Chuck Todd...
http://theobamadiary.com/2013/01/14/the-news-conference/From Todays Presser: Go to: The Obama Diary to see the rest of the pictures and Chipstick"s comments. LOL~
[url=http://postimage.org/][img][/img][/url]
President Obama gives up trying to educate Chuck Todd hes lots of things, but hes not a miracle worker
Flashmann
(2,140 posts)I watched that exchange,live....It sort of seemed to me,that Toadboy intended his line of questioning to be of the "gotcha" nature,designed to showcase how clever and concerned he is...I think he's probably oblivious to the fact that the President verbally slapped him around,instead...
sheshe2
(83,925 posts)Chucky sure did write the book on Stupid!
[url=http://postimage.org/][img][/img][/url]
Chuckles has been having a case of swelled head for quite a while . He thinks he is a, king-maker or -breaker . If I were the president . in future I would ignore him .
Flashmann
(2,140 posts)I avoid listening to him every chance I get....If it weren't a Presidential press conference,I would have muted his silly ass today....
Whisp
(24,096 posts)I was in another room so couldn't see the tv but heard the name 'chuck' and wondered if it was the Toad Chuck. Well, after Obama had to explain to him that it was like going out for dinner, eating and then not wanting to pay the bill - that this was comparable - money has already been commited - when Obama had to speak real slowly and do the show and tell more than once - I knew it was Chuck Fuck Idiot.
What a moran that doesn't know what the ceiling is really about.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)That Im trying really, really, really hard to take you seriously, you dick, but you are not making it easy face
****
made me literally lol
sheshe2
(83,925 posts)truebrit71
(20,805 posts)You nailed it!
You about nailed it ...
"I seriously have to deal with this shit?"
Whisp
(24,096 posts)dang, can't remember. Could be a line there too.
madamesilverspurs
(15,809 posts)wouldn't last long in my 93-year-old mother's living room. First time he interrupted anyone (not to mention POTUS) he'd find his ear grabbed and his person draped across a lap for a spanking. No - I do NOT advocate corporal punishment, but I wouldn't mind some penalty for violation of the expectation of respect when the Head of State is speaking.
-
sheshe2
(83,925 posts)tblue37
(65,488 posts)sheshe2
(83,925 posts)by ladyhawke...it explains.
Hope that helps, tblue.
sheshe
rickford66
(5,528 posts)The website hangs up my laptop. Could someone summarize the exchange just as the other poster requested?
sheshe2
(83,925 posts)Here is the link I was referring to..
http://pmcarpenter.blogs.com/p_m_carpenters_commentary/
scrll down to..Obama's Presser.
sheshe
deafskeptic
(463 posts)sheshe2
(83,925 posts)Go to the Obama Diary @
http://theobamadiary.com/
The story is at the top. The news conference. The other link at post #22 is also a good explaination.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)that's the gist of this thread.
But in case you wanted to know the reporter's question and our president's answer, here is the exchange:
Q: As you know, the Senate Democrats, Harry Reid sent you a letter begging you, essentially, to take -- consider some sort of executive action on this debt ceiling issue. I know youve said youre not negotiating on it. Your administration has ruled out the various ideas that have been out there, the 14th Amendment, but just this morning House -- one of the House Democratic leaders, Jim Clyburn, asked you to use the 14th Amendment, and even said sometimes thats what it takes. He brought up the Emancipation Proclamation, saying it took executive action when Congress wouldnt act, and he compared the debt ceiling to that.
So are you considering a Plan B? And if not, why not?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, Chuck, the issue here is whether or not America pays its bills. We are not a deadbeat nation. And so theres a very simple solution to this. Congress authorizes us to pay our bills.
Now if the House and the Senate want to give me the authority so that they dont have to take these tough votes, if they want to put the responsibility on me to raise the debt ceiling, Im happily (sic) to take it. Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, had a proposal like that last year, and Im happy to accept it.
But if they want to keep this responsibility, then they need to go ahead and get it done. And you know, there are no magic tricks here. There are no loopholes. There are no, you know, easy outs. This is a matter of Congress authorizes spending. They order me to spend. They tell me: You need to fund our Defense Department at such-and-such a level. You need to send Social Security checks. You need to make sure that you are paying to care for our veterans.
They lay all this out for me, and -- because they have the spending power. And so I am required by law to go ahead and pay these bills.
Separately, they also have to authorize a raising of the debt ceiling in order to make sure that those bills are paid. And so what Congress cant do is tell me to spend X and then say, but were not going to give you the authority to go ahead and pay the bills.
And -- and I just want to repeat, because I think sometimes the American people understandably arent following all -- all the debates here in Washington, raising the debt ceiling does not authorize us to spend more. All it does is say that America will pay its bills. And we are not a deadbeat nation. And the consequences of us not paying our bills, as I outlined in my opening statement, would be disastrous.
So I understand the impulse to try to get around this in a simple way. But theres one way to get around this. Theres one way to deal with it, and that is for Congress to authorize me to pay for those items of spending that they have already authorized.
And you know, the notion that Republicans in the House or maybe some Republicans in the Senate would suggest that in order for us to get our way on our spending priorities that we would risk the full faith and credit of the United States -- that, I think, is not what the founders intended. Thats not how I think most Americans think our democracy should work. You know, theyve got a point of view. Democrats in Congress have a point of view. They need to sit down and -- and work out a compromise.
Q: (Off mic.)
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Yeah.
Q: (Off mic.)
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Yeah.
Q: So if youre not negotiating and they say you have to negotiate and youre not considering another plan B, do you think we should wait it out and -- (off mic)?
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, look, Chuck, there -- there are -- theres a pretty straightforward way of doing this, and that is to set the debt ceiling aside, we pay our bills and then we have a vigorous debate about how were going to do further deficit reduction in a balanced way.
I keep in mind that, you know, what weve heard from some Republicans in both the House and the Senate is that they will only increase the debt ceiling by the amount of spending cuts that theyre able to push through. And in order to replace the automatic spending cut, the sequester, thats $1.2 trillion. Say it takes another trillion (dollars) or trillion two to get us through one more year. Theyd have to identify $2.5 trillion in cuts just to get the debt ceiling extended to next year -- 2.5 trillion (dollars).
They cant even -- Congress has not been able to identify $1.2 trillion in cuts that theyre happy with, because these same Republicans say they dont want to cut defense. They claim that they dont want to gut Medicare or harm the vulnerable, but the truth of the matter is, is that you cant meet their own criteria without drastically cutting Medicare or having an impact on Medicaid or affecting our defense spending. So the math just doesnt add up.
Now, what -- heres what would work. What would work would be for us to say, weve already done close to $2 trillion in deficit reduction, and if you add the interest that we wont be paying because of less spending and increased revenue, it adds up to about $2.5 trillion.
The consensus is we need about $4 trillion to stabilize our debt and our deficit, which means we need about $1.5 trillion more. The package that I offered to Speaker Boehner before we -- before the new year would achieve that. We were actually fairly close in terms of arriving at that number.
So -- so if the goal is to make sure that we are being responsible about our debt and our deficit, if thats the conversation were having, Im happy to have that conversation. And by closing some additional loopholes through tax reform -- which Speaker Boehner has acknowledged can raise money in a sensible way -- and by doing some additional cuts, including making sure that we are reducing our health care spending, which is the main driver of our deficits, we can arrive at a package to get this thing done. Im happy to have that conversation.
What I will not do is to have that negotiation with a gun at the head of the American people; the threat that unless we get our way, unless you gut Medicare or Medicaid or, you know, otherwise slash things that the American people dont believe should be slashed, that were going to threaten to wreck the entire economy. That is not how historically this has been done. Thats not how were going to do it this time.
Q: Theres no plan -- (off mic) -- youre not searching for any other ideas, or are you --
PRESIDENT OBAMA: What -- what -- what Im --
Q: -- let me ask -- (inaudible).
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Chuck, what Im saying to you is that there is no simpler solution; no ready, credible solution other than Congress either give me the authority to raise the debt ceiling, or exercise the responsibility that they have kept for themselves and raise the debt ceiling, because this is about paying your bills.
Everybody -- everybody here understands this. I mean, this is not a complicated concept. You dont go out to dinner and then, you know, eat all you want and then leave without paying the check. And if you do, youre breaking the law.
And Congress is -- should think about it the same way that the American people do. You dont -- now if -- if Congress wants to have a debate about maybe we shouldnt go out to dinner next time, maybe we should go to a more modest restaurant, thats fine. That -- thats a debate that we should have. But you dont -- you dont say, in order for me to control my appetites, Im going to not pay the people who are provided me services, people who already lent me the money. That -- thats not -- thats not showing any discipline. All thats doing is not meeting your obligations. You cant do that.
And -- and -- and -- and thats not a credible way to run this government. We -- weve got to stop lurching from crisis to crisis to crisis when theres this clear path ahead of us that simply requires some discipline, some responsibility and some compromise. Thats where we need to go. Thats how this needs to work.
sad-cafe
(1,277 posts)That was great.
renate
(13,776 posts)tblue37
(65,488 posts)the very general information that Todd had asked something about the debt ceiling and Obama had made it clear that it was about paying what we already owe, not about new spending. But that wasn't exactly informative about how he had "schooled" Chuck Tood.
I don't understand why people who post videos are unwilling to provide a brief summary, or why when asked to do so, their response is, "Just follow the link," when the linked page also doesn't summarize the video very effectively.
It reminds me of the comeback that was so common among those who fully understood computers in the early days of personal computing. We non-experts would ask to have something technical explained, and the computer experts would snarl, "RTFM!"* But the "FM" was written in such incomprehensible technospeak that it was like a foreign language to those of us who were new to computers.
____________
*Read the f***ing manual!
siligut
(12,272 posts)He explained what the debt ceiling was and why it is important to raise it and the consequences of not raising it.
He also make it clear that the GOP is the problem.
Chuck Todd, trying to make shit, asked President Barack Obama whether or not he would invoke the 14th Amendment in order to raise the nations debt ceiling without Congresss approval.
Obama told him that if the House and the Senate want to give him that authority in order to avoid making the tough votes he would be happy to take it.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)it is sadness incarnate...
Response to sheshe2 (Original post)
hfojvt This message was self-deleted by its author.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)...because your post is total bs.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)trying to join with like-minded individuals to work to reverse Bush policies.
One of the ways we thought we were gonna do that was by electing Obama.
But now Obama has betrayed us by opting to keep so many Bush policies.
And the board is mostly populated by people who do not care.
Much like most of the country.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)"And the board is mostly populated by people who do not care."
This appears to be a call out of DU Membership as a whole. One wonders why?
sheshe2
(83,925 posts)bama_blue_dot
(224 posts)it is extremely hard to take anything you say seriously..
olegramps
(8,200 posts)butterflygirl
(44 posts)MSNBC had on last year where he was driving a car and he says "I'm here to ask the tough questions", yeah you really asked W the tough questions. How many lives would have been saved Chuckie boy, had you really done your job then.
sad-cafe
(1,277 posts)I am not sure why anyone thinks he contributes anything.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)annabanana
(52,791 posts). . . Wastes your time and annoys the pig.
CommoFreq
(11 posts)Seriously. That would be the last thing on my agenda.
sheshe2
(83,925 posts)Nothing.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)integrity and respect for all people...the president showed so much patience addressing the disrespectful, unruly & childish ego of chuckie boy.
arthritisR_US
(7,299 posts)Cha
(297,692 posts)it's not in the media's self-interest to have a well informed Public.
P.M. Carpenter and chips bring this to light kinda like when Jon Stewart talks about republicons. It's horrible but he makes it bearable through his hysterical take on it.
"BREAKING NEWS: RAISING THE DEBT CEILING DOES NOT AUTHORIZE MORE SPENDING!!"
Why is that "breaking news"? Why hasn't the "media" already informed the American People of that?
Thanks, she, for bringing this on DU!
sheshe2
(83,925 posts)Interesting...from Wiki.
The show's writers reject the idea that The Daily Show has become a source of news for young people. Stewart argues that Americans are living in an "age of information osmosis" in which it is close to impossible to gain one's news from any single source, and says that his show succeeds comedically because the viewers already have some knowledge about current events. "Our show would not be valuable to people who didn't understand the news because it wouldn't make sense," he argues. "We make assumptions about your level of knowledge that... if we were your only source of news, you would just watch our show and think, 'I don't know what's happening.'"[94]
A 2006 study published by Indiana University tried to compare the substantive amount of information of The Daily Show against prime time network news broadcasts, and concluded that when it comes to substance, there is little difference between The Daily Show and other news outlets. The study contended that, since both programs are more focused on the nature of "infotainment" and ratings than on the dissemination of information, both are broadly equal in terms of the amount of substantial news coverage they offer.[95]
SNIP:
As the lines between comedy show and news show have blurred, Jon Stewart has come under pressure in some circles to engage in more serious journalism. Tucker Carlson and Daily Show co-creator Lizz Winstead have chastised Stewart for criticizing politicians and newspeople in his solo segments and then, in interviews with the same people, rarely taking them to task face-to-face. In 2004, Winstead expressed a desire for Stewart to ask harder satirical questions, saying, "When you are interviewing a Richard Perle or a Kissinger, if you give them a pass, then you become what you are satirizing. You have a war criminal sitting on your couchto just let him be a war criminal sitting on your couch means you are having to respect some kind of boundary."[96] She has argued that The Daily Show's success and access to the youth vote should allow Stewart to press political guests harder without fearing that they will not return to the show.[97] In 2010, Winstead had changed her views, commenting that since 2004, Stewart did some of the hardest-hitting interviews on TV.[98] Stewart said in 2003 that he does not think of himself as a social or media critic and rejects the idea that he has any journalistic role as an interviewer.[99]
she
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Show
Cha
(297,692 posts)His show is a mixed bag but he comes off with more journalistic integrity than most corporate slaves on tv(think wolf blitzer-john king variety).. and some of the funniest exposes of propaganda in the tv universe. 'Bullshit Mountain" comes to mind.
Jon gives us Pearls wrapped in comedy gold..
"Jon Stewart's Best Lines From 'Rumble' Debate With Bill O'Reilly"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/07/jon-stewarts-best-lines-from-oreilly-rumble_n_1946576.html
The gop and their presstitute water carriers are a depressing cancer on America.. the only way to deal is ridiculing them.
That Im trying really, really, really hard to take you seriously, you dick, but you are not making it easy face
Priceless!
sheshe2
(83,925 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 14, 2013, 09:27 PM - Edit history (1)
My Fav's!!!
Moderator: If the U.S. was burning, what famous person would you save?
Bill: "I would say Oprah, she's worth about a hundred billion. Who would you save?"
Jon: "My family?"
On his political hero: "I would say Robert Kennedy. He had a passion and a depth of belief, and an optimism, and a tenacity that I very much admired. He was one of the first people I remember learning about, and maybe his death left an indelible mark. I felt that Robert Kennedy was a man of political integrity."
When Bill says Clint Eastwood should run for president: "Well, why don't we ask him?" ...turns to empty chair
Sorry I missed that one,Cha. Will save to watch vid later!
To Jon!
she
lpbk2713
(42,766 posts)"Chuck, you ignorant fuck!"
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)He's a complete asshole with shit for brains.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)and a relevant one.
And then he asked a number of follow-up questions, appropriately, when Obama did not give a direct answer.
Todd had raised the same issue with Jim Clyburn earlier in the day:
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)and he went there! Hallelujah!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/president-obamas-news-conference-on-the-debt-ceiling-fiscal-battles-and-gun-control-jan-14-2013-transcript/2013/01/14/9bc1a690-5e65-11e2-90a0-73c8343c6d61_story_4.html
great white snark
(2,646 posts)His "proceed" face is serving him well.
Cha
(297,692 posts)"proceed" face!
Thanks great white!
CanonRay
(14,118 posts)Only David Gregory is worse.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)and their Georgetown cocktail party talking points.
They are all probably at one right now.
Jake2413
(226 posts)Between Chuck Todd and David Gregory I don't know who is the bigger tool.