General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhite House, Senate unveil final, even stupider 'fiscal cliff' deal. Vote expected tonight.
by Hunter
In a last homage to epic legislative incompetence to close out this year, the White House and the Senate have apparently agreed to give hostage taking Republicans still more of what they wanted in order to close a deal that puts off the current fiscal cliff for two mere months:
Senate Republicans said negotiators also agreed to put off $110 billion in across-the-board cuts to military and domestic programs for two months while broader deficit reduction talks continue. Those cuts begin to go into force on Wednesday Jan. 2, and that deadline too might be missed before Congress approves the deal.
The new deadline lines up, not coincidentally, with the deadline for once again raising the debt ceiling. That fight is expected to be even more bitter than this one, with Republicans expecting they will be in a much better position for another round of hostage-taking. Democrats also have apparently agreed to new concessions on indexing the estate tax (apparently even dead rich people need catering to, now, if we're to continue basic government functions.)
The Senate is expected to vote tonight. As for what the House will do tomorrow, it's anyone's guess. We shall see if these latest two concessionsthe most important one being a promise to revisit this entire incompetent, buffoonish fiasco in a mere 60 days, but with the looming threat of tax increases removed from over Republican headsare enough to convince the House to pass the current deal in spite of their current hurt fee-fees.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/31/1175249/-White-House-Senate-unveil-final-even-stupider-fiscal-cliff-deal-Vote-expected-tonight
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)The one percent wins again, as bipartisanly orchestrated.
And more hosing to be scheduled, not far down the road.
DearHeart
(692 posts)going on between both parties. Knew something was up. Sickening.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)And the President and the Democrats will be weaker.
It does not look like a smart move, on first impression.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)it's now on Democrats to pass it, especially in the House.
I'm surprised ProSense. I thought you would be supportive of this??
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Everyone understood the dynamics of the health care debate.
Few understood the dynamics of the 2011 deal, which is what, along with the election, gave the President a lot of leverage. Oh, the election was a big part, but the sequestration and the tax cuts expiring enhanced that leverage.
The fact that Republicans are coming out of this deal with another hostage is beyond bizarre. And remember, the President loses leverage on tax increases.
The other way around. He would have room to give. His hand would be strengthened.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)of such things administration wise. It is almost as if PS is of two minds on this.
I guess we can all change when we see the light.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)in 60 freakin' days.
Yeah, that'll end well.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)Are they alright? It's hard to believe that Democrats and the President are really that stupid. There's something else at work here. And finally: Et tu, Biden?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)It makes no friggin sense.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)Just a hunch.
Lasher
(27,637 posts)Boner? He can't deliver the votes. Senator Yertle? Surely you don't think he could be trusted to keep such a promise.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Indeed. It's well past time to be honest about that.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)You gotta give credit, where credit is due.
Now can we stop the drone killings and shut down the NSA?
W_HAMILTON
(7,873 posts)The Senate votes tonight, there is no threatened filibuster, so it passes with 50 or so votes, all coming from Democratic-caucusing Senators. No Republican Senators vote for it, therefore they can claim they never voted to raise taxes; in the House, where Republicans votes are actually needed for it to pass, they won't vote on it tonight, and instead will vote on it in the coming days, when we've already gone off "the fiscal cliff" and they can claim they are voting for tax cuts.
I'm sure in exchange for caving on taxes and allowing Republicans to save face, Republicans will be much more amiable in two months when we are debating spending cuts and the debt ceiling
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)have the Repigs stuck a shim into the back of the Democrats?
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)A shim is something you use to squarel a door jamb.
In Truth We Trust
(3,117 posts)contemptable.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,192 posts)W_HAMILTON
(7,873 posts)My post was made Monday night, when the vote would have been to raise taxes.
The Senate put off the vote till early Tuesday, when we had already gone off "the fiscal cliff" and therefore the vote was to lower taxes that had automatically been raised at the stroke of midnight.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)And they'll start being nice to us.
bongbong
(5,436 posts)when a Democrat is in power (according to the MSM & its accepted "wisdom"
Thus, if another Dem follows Obama (or he gets a third term - oh wait I'm not supposed to mention our secret plans), and current budgetary/deal-making trends continue, by 2030 or so only military spending will get any funding.
What a bright future for us. USA! USA! USA!
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)and the GOP shall take all blame.
And all shall rejoice.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)by the Democrats.
Pryderi
(6,772 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)But with the nuts controlling half of Congress, any deal is going to be shitty -- and so not doing anything.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)This might be a good result, Boehner knew he would never get anything passed with the TP but could with Democrats voting with him on a deal worked out in the Senate with Democrats and Republicans. The GOP has gotten themselves in a bind with the TP who thinks they are in charge. It is time to leave them in the dust and get on with governing.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)Swooping in at the very last second to make the world safe once again.
Until the next "match" anyway.
This is some seriously bad theater, the WH needs better writers and choreographers if they hope to make giving away too much a lot more convincing when they try to sell the chained CPI again in the near future.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)As most of the opposition here, it seems mostly matter of gnashing teeth about the next fight. The provisions of this deal are pretty good. I don't think it hurts us for the next fight, and, quite frankly, I find some of the claims that we're now in for another fight in a few months a bit pusillanimous.
W_HAMILTON
(7,873 posts)They essentially upped the vote threshold in the Senate from 51 votes to 60.
They turn previously bipartisan, ho-hum votes on issues such as the debt ceiling into contentious affairs where the other side must provide them with concessions if they want it to pass.
The lost the presidency, they lost ground in both the Senate and House and yet claim they didn't lose the election. More people voted for Democrats than Republicans in the presidential race, Senate races, and House races, yet they claim the American people stand with them.
Any of this ring a bell?
Christ, the Republicans even hate Boehner; you think they are going to play nice this next go-around? What on Earth have you seen in the recent past that would lead you to believe anything other than they are going to be bloodthirsty in two months when it's time to debate spending cuts / the debt ceiling limit?
The simple fact that Republicans won't agree on a deal to postpone sequestration for as long as the tax deal is in effect NOW and agree to raise the debt limit NOW, even after the Democrats have given way on tax issues, should give you an idea of what is in store in the next couple of months. If the Republicans won't concede on those two issues now, even after the Democrats have capitulated on tax increases, why would they do so in a couple of months? What will the Democrats have to offer them in exchange then?
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)How you got that from any of my posts is a mystery to me.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)and it cannot come up for a vote in time.
My money is on Jim Demented.