Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question about Chained-CPI and the media (Original Post) Eric J in MN Dec 2012 OP
Thom Hartman newfie11 Dec 2012 #1
Sam Seder is also opposed to Chained-CPI. Eric J in MN Dec 2012 #2
+1 newfie11 Dec 2012 #3
Chris Hayes has explained it is simply a cut. DirkGently Dec 2012 #4
None. Igel Dec 2012 #5
I've seen Cenk & Ed Schultz oppose it Oilwellian Dec 2012 #6

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
4. Chris Hayes has explained it is simply a cut.
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 04:45 PM
Dec 2012

Hayes is an obsessively technical wonk, and he doesn't shy away from talking about even the hairiest detail. But he summed up chained CPI by saying it's a way to calculate benefits in a way that REDUCES THEM.

Because that's what it is, and that is all that ultimately matters about it. From there, people can draw their own conclusions.

Are SS benefits too high? The elderly and retired and disabled doing to well? Too much fat in that system?

Or not?

Igel

(35,323 posts)
5. None.
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 05:41 PM
Dec 2012

Can't stand blithering pontificators. (I'm no different from others.Nobody likes competition.

NPR's ME simply explained it. It will have a larger effect in later years than in a shorter time frame. So it's like every other "acceptable" deficit reduction scheme--you count the deficit reduction over 10 years, with 80% of it occuring in the last few years and almost none in the next few years. That makes it short-term painless, and there's usually the belief that any problem can be fixed before the "long-term painful" kicks in. It's perceived as a smallish thing to trade for something that has a large effect short-term.

It accounts for realistic choices, based not on a fixed, static set of purchases but what people actually buy. So if cow gives you sticker shock you buy chicken. As people go back to buying beef, that's factored in. Rent vs. house, big car vs small car, car vs bus, etc., etc.

Downside is that it too broad a sampling, and doesn't adequately account for the "basket" of stuff and services that retirees purchase. They disproportionately buy medications and seek health care, which has a higher CPI than the current index or, especially, the chained CPI.

They went into more detail. They didn't take a stand. I like that in news sources. There's more than enough agitprop in the selection of news stories and sequencing and selection of the facts that make up news stories. I try to avoid seeking out preachers and polemicists as news presenters.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
6. I've seen Cenk & Ed Schultz oppose it
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 06:54 PM
Dec 2012

All of cable news is for the most part encouraging us to call our representatives and ask that they compromise. I have to wonder how many Americans are actually calling their representatives and asking them to cut their Social Security and Medicare benefits. Orwellian would be proud to see American Pravda at work.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question about Chained-CP...