General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCoarseness and dumbing-down of our modern culture (cross-post)
Just got TV after 20 years. Cannot BELIEVE how dumbed-down and coarse the discourse has become.
Husband wanted to see History Channel last night (channel-surfing). There was a terrible, rude, coarse show on about Native Americans that treated them terribly rudely and offensively! Discovery Channel, no better.
I think American culture has become terribly coarse and rude over the past 20 or so years. In the guise of coolness, I guess. It trends too towards violence and pornography. Everything has to be graphic and in your face. Reality TV - so obviously contrived, but many Americans seem to think it is true. (Read a book!)
A rare film director who runs counter to this trend is Ang Lee (Chinese, but makes films shown in the West). Contrast this with Tarantino. People just have to go further and further to "shock and awe," grab attention, and we all just get stupider and more desensitized.
I believe Pres. Obama and his family are also a counter-trend: classy, dignified, educated, intelligent, gracious. This is what tea-party types find offensive about them!
Now get off my lawn!
planetc
(7,824 posts)I watched Saturday Night Live recently after a long period of neglect. The show used to be rude to politicians, but the skit that persuaded me to give up watching made gynecological fun of the British royal family. The skit was rude, all right, but also pointless and unfunny. I suspect SNL is responding to the demographics of its audience: young, urban, plugged in, and culturally semi-literate.
For contrast, people could try watching a few classic films on Turner Movie Classics. Wit, talent, and energy flourished before the advent of technicolor. And after it, for awhile, it was shocking to hear Clark Gable use the word "damn" on screen.
If taste is a pendulum, we are about due for a swing back in the direction of clean dialogue and literate screenwriters.
BigDemVoter
(4,153 posts)But I don't necessarily agree with you about SNL "responding to the demographics of its audience: young, urban, plugged in. . ." In my experience, the young, urban & plugged-in have been well-educated, culturally literate and knowledgeable about current events. It's often others--middle-aged, rural and definitely NOT literate, who are often the problem. And for full-disclosure, I am DEFINITELY middle-aged myself!
gblady
(3,541 posts)it's like we, as a culture, have lost our moral compass.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,843 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)I've often thought of how shocked my father would be by many things if he could be brought back to life now, 47 years after he died.
cilla4progress
(24,750 posts)I was just able to keep it at more of a distance. Last time I watched TV with any regularity it was the 3 networks. Not 500 channels of crass!
Family was hopeful and naive that "History" and "Discovery" channel would be serious and informative, while understandably entertaining. What we tuned into last night was well beyond the pale, and shockingly offensive and stupid.
Came upstairs and read. Turned in early.
Will use TV for only planned very selective viewing. In 2 years, when contract is up, will decide if it is worth it for that.
spanone
(135,854 posts)vacuous....
insulting...
pandering...
ignorant...
guess it reflects society itself.
Archae
(46,339 posts)spanone
(135,854 posts)kwassa
(23,340 posts)This is not a new phenomenon.
I believe PT Barnum said that no one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public, and he said it a very long time ago.
barnabas63
(1,214 posts)IDemo
(16,926 posts)Not to the extent that now permeates society, however.
barnabas63
(1,214 posts)I feel really bad for children. When I was young, there really was a fair amount of quality programming - art, music, creativity that fostered growth. I swear I saw this on the Capt. Kang. show. Modern dance....where would a kid see this today?? nowhere...
Jazzgirl
(3,744 posts)I have always loved jazz and all kinds of music. I was raised on Brubeck, Oscar Peterson, Dorothy Donegan and way too many more to name. That was awesome! Thanks for posting.
Flabbergasted
(7,826 posts)documentaries, crime shows, or the epitome of sensationalism "reality" tv: anything but.
I have watched many documentaries over the years featuring music and overly dramatic vocals that are obviously designed to draw an emotional response. I wonder: "Are they trying to teach me or appeal to my emotions". It is not that the shows are not educational, but I feel that the production borders on manipulation.
You can likewise see this effect in shows such as, "FBI's Most Wanted" which sensationalize crimes and criminals, drawing from the deep well of terror, misery, and cynicism.
Some of the history channels specials are largely pseudo-scientific theories long in speculation and light in facts luring the gullible into believing largely fictions. These shows use sensational ideas to attract viewership because that is more important than integrity.
When I happen to be in the same area when one of these travesties is playing, I do so with a mixture of a snide smile and a grimace of horror. Yes, I'm being overly dramatic. Perhaps, I'm reflecting what I've seen on tv.
cilla4progress
(24,750 posts)really ...
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)omnipotent power of authority.
People actually believe that police solve crimes and the guilty are caught. They believe that a conviction is synonymous with guilt. They believe that buying that unattainable gadget will change their life and make them happy.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)It took them maybe half a day to come up with a sappy violin soundtrack to play during their Sandy Hook reports.
I really don't think we need that kind of musical prompt to tell us that we're supposed to be saddened by such a tragedy.
Just report the damn news and stop turning everything into a soap opera.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)or as you become disillusioned?
downandoutnow
(56 posts)themselves these days praising it.
With the family at my sister's over Christmas, and we all watched an episode of "Modern Family" - which is highly critically praised. I was highly underwhelmed. It's just a brain-dead sit-com with lame jokes. The gay couple were incredibly stereotypical. And how am I supposed to believe that suburbia is chock-full of smoking-hot women married to old, schlubby men who aren't incredibly rich?
And that leaves aside all the gross stuff that gets its ass kissed by elite critics - Dexter, Breaking Bad, etc. I think in part this is a result of the increasingly small, exclusive world that the better-off live in these days. They live in crime-free enclaves, and get their vicarious jollies drooling over what to them is exotic violence. Plus these fortunate sons and daughters pretty much all grew up together - those who got MFAs and go to Hollywood to be writers know that their compatriots who got English and/or Journalism degrees will stroke their egos and praise whatever dreck they create.
I like good humor, which is real hard to do, and will forgive it a lot of crudity, but things go too far. Turned on the TV once in the middle of that Louis C.K. show (he's another contemporary sacred cow) -- came up right in the middle of interminable masturbation jokes that just went on and on. Sorry Louis, you may be a comic genius, but that stuff's a little too hard for me to swallow.
There's still some good stuff on TV to watch now and then, despite it all. Thank god for C-SPAN 1, 2 and 3! And Turner Classic Movies - with no commercials! And I don't claim to be highbrow - I've caught a good number of episodes of Gold Rush and enjoy it, but that's about it!
Igel
(35,323 posts)There had been a cadre of educated folk. Some were effete, many just "cultured". Then there were the masses, mostly uneducated. The ranks of the refined had been increasing. They were becoming more and more sensitive to more and more things.
After the Revolution educated people had to decide. They were either going to go more effete or more plebian. The pro-plebe contingent was the wise move. The effetes were typically destroyed in the 1930s.
This resulted in a "coarsening" of Russian culture. The uneducated masses suddenly had some education, but where told that their cultural norms were as good or better than the old cultural norms. This affected language, literature, films, and pretty much everything else.
Something akin to this happened to the new cultural elite in the early 1990s. The barely educated masses were still there, but a new cultural elite had managed to take top place. The democratization of the media swamped the old "new standards of speech" and culture.
Much of what's happening in the ME is similar. Iraq was cultured. But in educating the masses they weren't assimilated to the prevailing "secular" and "educated" culture. They were simply taught to read and do sums. There was again no buy-in, and they had a competing cultural norm--one that was more tribe-centric, religion-centered, and less tolerant. As most groups are.
Why should the US be any different? Classical music was an imposition by the educated classes on an "authentic" working class with its own, purportedly superior, cultural norms. Not making fun of people in wheelchairs or good spelling or not having 50% of your words be profanity is again an imposition by the educated classes on an "authentic" population with its own cultural norms.
And it's even worse if you're not the same skin color, because then your genetics make it impossible for you to even understand.
Obama has an edge to what he says. He's bicultural, and just as he's adopted AAVE as an active second dialect and is comfortable playing off of it he's also comfortable with other cultural norms, some of which he believes are superior.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)time now. His films include some of my favorites and also films like 'The Hulk' which is 'The Hulk'.
Your OP's emphasis on words like 'coarse and rude' makes me wonder what you'd think of Lee's 2007 film 'Lust, Caution'. NC-17 for explicit sex scenes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lust,_Caution_%28film%29
cilla4progress
(24,750 posts)Sounds like I should!
1-Old-Man
(2,667 posts)My wife turns on Jeopardy every weekday evening at 7, its a pretty good show.
Now and then there is a movie worth watching, but not often. HBO series can be good, "The Wire" may have been the best television program (lots of violence, none of it gratuitous) ever shown, and of course there are always Current TV (well, maybe not always) and Free Speech TV. Surprisingly enough the Speed Channel can be interesting at times too.
Where is the great wasteland? Broadcast television (what we dish folks call 'local TV'). If we had to rely on the airways or cable I would not bother to own a television.
cilla4progress
(24,750 posts)NatGeo?
I intend to watch some special programming, the Kennedy Center Awards, Inauguration, even the Oscars, the other awards show. We like Glee and I heard that Nashville is pretty good.
1-Old-Man
(2,667 posts)You can buy the local channels package for an additional $5 a month, I think it is. If your local area (I'm in West Virginia but they consider us part of Pittsburgh) has aPBS channel then that is the one you get and the national feed is denied to you no matter what package you have. So if the local public channel is for shit, which the Pittsburgh channel is, then that is the only one you can get.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)we rarely turn on tv anymore. well, i never do and hubby is stuck on a couple channels. i think he is more disgusted by it than i am. my kids do not watch tv. and this is no longer about me directing them. as teens they pretty well make those decisions. but, in our house people are prettty tired of the ugly.
cilla4progress
(24,750 posts)You've parented well!
sibelian
(7,804 posts)I think the hole left by those who generate cultural content has to be filled by the rest of us generating tightly constructed, well-thought out USEFUL ideas that get seen. As often as possible.
Even a message on an Internet discussion board can be done well.