General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe saw Lincoln tonight. Thoughts on the movie and its relation to today's politics...
Fascinating - my friend told me he thought it was "long" - my wife and I disagree - it was just a marvelous experience to behold. Superb acting - and always amazing at how a well done historical movie can keep you on the edge of your seat even when you know how it will end. And it was moving - incredibly moving.
It reinforced how messy politics is - how cruel it can be, how polarizing, how selfish, obtuse, corrupt, frustrating. How difficult it is to do the right thing; how much patience is required. How much like today it was back then...except that we seem to have lost the ability to compromise at all (especially the current version of republicans, of course). If Lincoln was indeed even close to what was portrayed, he was such a vital man for his time, an amazing human being. It also reinforced that politics isn't for everyone...and some of those that enter it probably shouldn't be there as well.
It also amazed me to see how young our country was. And how grotesque the civil war was. And so much more...it is going to take me some days to digest it all.
Finally - I do sense some of what made Lincoln special in our current president.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)it is only "long" if you are conditioned to think a movie can only be good if it contains endless CGI action scenes
NRaleighLiberal
(60,015 posts)all noise, violence, effects, guns, chaos. not our thing.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)There's no way he killed so many vampires.
Lex
(34,108 posts)oops too late
Skittles
(153,169 posts)*EGREGIOUS*
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)frostfern
(67 posts)It was about leadership. Even in the face of the inescapable messiness, pettiness, and dishonesty of politics. It's not really about compromising ideals so much as the method of realization. No matter how good moral grandstanding and harsh partisan criticism feels it doesn't really breed trust for those sitting on the fence.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)yellerpup
(12,253 posts)I thought Daniel Day-Lewis inhabited the role of Lincoln. It didn't seem long to us, either, but then we both like history and the relationship between Lincoln and Mary was so real, so full of tragedy.
47of74
(18,470 posts)The guys who were in the R column back then would be D today, and vise versa. Any one of them would probably get teabagged right out of the Republican party today. Especially Lincoln.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,015 posts)UTUSN
(70,716 posts)tavernier
(12,394 posts)Tommy Lee Jones.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)bad wig
tavernier
(12,394 posts)Very, very bad wig, probably based on portraits of this guy who, I understand, was quite the character.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Thaddeus Stevens suffered from an affliction that caused him to lose all of his hair at age 35. He wore exactly the kind of ridiculous wig you saw in the film, which everyone knew and sometimes made fun of.
northoftheborder
(7,572 posts)Terrific acting. Deserves multiple awards. Interesting how little congress has changed. Still provincial, many predjudices, ignorance, stubborness. I certainly learned some details of history I didn't know. I didn't know how close the vote was on passing the 14th amendment.
werknotgoin2takeit
(172 posts)(A FEW MILD SPOILERS)
I was lucky enough to see it twice. Over Thanksgiving my MIL/FIL were visiting and this seemed a great way to spend an afternoon after binging on turkey.The second time was the day after Christmas in an old pre-WWI theater with my mum and brother. I thought it was riveting from start to finish both times. Daniel Day Lewis will be remembered as the penultimate Lincoln putting another notch in his illustrious career. I kept forgetting that at its core it was about the passage of an amendment. There was so many incredible performances. The ones that really stick out is Mary Tod Lincoln greeting Thaddeus Stevens at their party, Lincoln confronting Mary about grief after Robert decides to join the Army, and (even though I knew the outcome) the voting on the amendment. Someone above said this movie was about compromise so they didn't like it but look again. Lincoln knew what he wanted and he would have it. It had to LOOK Bipartisan but there was no real compromise. That is why Stevens would not allow the one Senator to change parties until after the vote. Lincoln would have it done and brought his considerable personal strength to bear and would brook NO dissension.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)We'll see that young man again, the kid impressed me.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)move and sway.
I love Obama, but he doesn't (and seems incapable of) moving and swaying people (other than his constituency).
pacalo
(24,721 posts)than Obama, had Lincoln been a non-White politician in modern times.
frostfern
(67 posts)The issue is the problems we face today are more complicated. This makes it easier to hide behind ideology. The evil of slavery was pretty much in your face. Not much room for rationalizing mental gymnastics.
I guess I could say most people today do admit there is a problem. The average wingnut see's the level of corruption and economic injustice that's occurring. They're just a bit deluded in where they place the blame. I don't think either side has any clear or straightforward idea of how to fix things. That's what's so fucked up about politics today.
Boomerproud
(7,960 posts)The people that need to be moved are (and have been for decades) so entrenched in their idealogy that I can't see anyone persuading them to change. My feeling about Barack Obama is simply "Why do you want this (the presidency)? What motivates you?" Twenty children are gunned down and what is America's reaction-buy more guns!!! I'm at a complete loss to explain anything anymore.
tavalon
(27,985 posts)Ken Burn's Civil War. But fascinating to this history buff who wasn't a history buff in school because it was booooooorrrrriiiing.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Shows how violent hand to hand combat was
frostfern
(67 posts)It kept my attention well enough that I didn't really notice the length. I pray to God things never get that bad again. That thought wouldn't have crossed my mind 10 years ago... sad.
People say that war was about slavery, and you can't deny that totally, but at an even deeper level it was about economics... slavery was an economic institution in the South. A lot of people who had an inkling of how immoral the institution of slavery was, were simply overpowered by fear of change. Why did things have to go below rock bottom? Why did so many people have to die? Fear. Money and fear are truly the root of all evil.
question everything
(47,498 posts)members of Congress actually voted their conscience;
that an amendment could be debated and voted in one month;
that Democrats were against the 13th Amendment - what will be next, voting? holding office? women voting?
that the White House really was the "people's house" with regular citizens coming and going, waiting to address the president
and, of course, with many movies depicting only 2-3 generations ago - the wonderful, rich language that everyone used.
Of course we know that the 13th Amendment passed, yet, the movie did hold my tension: will it pass?
Pirate Smile
(27,617 posts)there are no more earmarks. There are still plenty of legislators who only do the right thing when they get something for it. There are a lot of people, both then and now, who did the right thing and voted their consciences but there are always some who need/want something more.
Unrepentant Fenian
(1,078 posts)and that is the reason that every vote counts.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)compromise are what great leaders like
Lincoln
FDR
LBJ
Obama
Carter
have done to secure forward movement
and it shows how it took 100 years from Lincoln to LBJ
and 50 more years from LBJ to Obama
and how it takes wheeling and dealing and doing WHATEVER is necessary to get it done
it also shows very importantly-how letting the other side think they are walking away with their dignity (and NOT being so 100% rigid on both sides like the tea party and some progressives as opposed to liberals, on the left do) allows it all to happen.
And it shows what an honorable, charitable man President Lincoln was.
He did allow the losing side to just get full amnesty and citizenship(a look ahead to the coming immigration end of that problem in later 2013) as opposed to massacre after the war ended.
For the good of the ENTIRE country
Kudos to Spielberg, Tony K, and all the actors/actresses
Daniel Day Lewis became Lincoln and for the first time, we had a voice for Lincoln
Sally Field
Tommy Lee Jones (and the wig he wore was exactly what the pictures of Stevens are, spot on)
and all the other actors/actresses in the movie
There is a reason Lincoln is considered the greatest President ever.
It's a shame he left the world so quick. Who knows what greatness was still to come afterwards from President Lincoln. Had he lived, it might not have taken 100 years til LBJ signed the acts.
And the man who was Stevens, what a fascinating character he was. A true American patriot.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Loved it. I wish it could have been a series , even at 2.5 hours it seemed short.
I liked it especially for the grotty directness and down on the mud sense of 19th century democracy. Nowadays the forces ate often the same, but the corporate sterility of the process makes it seemed removed from humanity and society.
jrandom421
(1,005 posts)It's a reminder of the Mark Twain's quote, "Those that respect the law and love sausage should watch neither being made.". The corruption is a little more blatant, but it just goes to show that Washington hasn't changed mucn in the last 150 years.
To me, Barak is the culmination of what Lincoln had fought for in the 13th Amendment. And while the Republicans and Democrats have essentially changed sides, the arguements are still the same.
It shows me that the Civil War had never been forgotten, that old attitudes die hard, and that Barak is still fighting Lincoln's fight, 150 years later.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)I thought it was brilliant. I thought DDL really captured the great man's spirit. Great cast, great writing, excellent direction, I can't praise it enough.
Even though you knew what the result would be, there was incredible tension and suspense during the roll call. When Yeaman shouts out in the affirmative after barely uttering his response the first time, I wanted to cheer out loud.
And I'm glad we were spared having to see the assassination. The way they did it was heartbreaking enough.
I walked away from this film the way I put down the Team of Rivals book. Devastated, in tears and bitterly resentful that the country was denied the leadership of this giant, that he was not allowed to finish his work. How different this country would have been had he lived.
I see Oscars in the future.
Response to NRaleighLiberal (Original post)
Loudly This message was self-deleted by its author.
lindysalsagal
(20,708 posts)Which is the largest part of the story: The ruthlessness of hatred. The willingness to kill and risk your own children for your own hatred.
The freedom of slaves wasn't really the problem, as much as the threat to the white's economic upper-hand. There were several characters who openly admitted that they wouldn't tolerate blacks stealing their prosperity. It was more financial than ideological.
This was about how good people can't escape the damage done by evil, greed, and jealousy.
But luckily, Spielberg kept it about Lincoln's goodness, and resisted the temptation to embellish his film with that hate.
Glaug-Eldare
(1,089 posts)I would've been a happy unionist until he decided on his own authority that we both remained subject to US authority, but weren't entitled to any of its protections.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)I liked the narrow focus on the 13th Amendment.
Tommy Lee Jones' portrayal of Thaddeus Stevens is enough of a reason to see the movie.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Enjoyed it thoroughly. Tons of interesting characters walking through.
All about arm twisting and patronage to get votes--Lincoln even mentioned the sleazy politicians of Tammany Hall.
DDL is great in just about any role. I've seen The Crucible, Gangs of New York, In the Name of the Father, Last of the Mohicans and The Age of Innocence.
Loved the story about Ethan Allen in London. Goes to the bathroom and there's a picture of George Washington on the wall. Then his British hosts tell him "Nothing will make an Englishman shit like a picture of George Washington on the wall."