General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsdid I hear this right today? Joe Scarborough said on Morning Joe that everyone was WRONG
when they said the election would be close!
If I recall correctly, he was part of that chorus that said, in grave tones, "It's gonna be REALLY close!"
They were even taking Mittster apart on his being completely out of touch.
Amazin' aint it?
Turbineguy
(37,369 posts)you are supposed to believe what he says without question. And if he changes what he says, it's only because you misunderstood what he meant before.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)He must know he has viewers who actually REMEMBER what he said last October...
Kahuna
(27,311 posts)how the momentum was with mitt because of the crowds...blah blah blah. I knew he was just spewing because he has a tell when he blatantly lies. He smirks while his eyes become extra beady.
catbyte
(34,454 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)He kept saying Nates' analysis was off.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)He acts like there is a Memory Hole where he can just send stuff he said and it's OK...
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Tikki
(14,559 posts)How Joseph Scarborough has any kind of show just amazes me.
Tikki
Recursion
(56,582 posts)TlalocW
(15,391 posts)Mainly because they paid attention to the news, and I read the informative posts here on DU and other sites - not the, "Rah, rah, I feel really great about our chances/I convinced another person to vote for Obama," posts, which are great in their own right. But the ones that talked about individual state polling and how it was breaking.
The news, more than anything, wants it to be a horse race, and they don't care about what the states are saying until election night. Before that it's all national polls - "The candidates are tied at 49% each! There's no way we can know how things are trending! Booga booga booga!" Or they tell us Obama is leading with this sub-group or that sub-group, and Romney has these other sub-groups, etc., and unless the sub-groups are White men, Hispanic/Latinos, women, etc., they don't tell you how significant it is (left-handed rural gay dentists are lining up behind Romney... this could be a game changer).
And while I was confident, I watched with nervousness because I was afraid that they were going to steal it, which is another reason for the media not to pay attention to how individual states are trending...
TlalocW
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)they were going to win. I didn't know exactly whether they "knew" something or they were just whistling in the dark.
turns out they knew a big thing because they had such a great ground campaign and were technically so proficient (and Romney's was so lame and in denial). But we didn't know all that so it was difficult to perceive what was what.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)I can't see the RPOF throwing him under the bus and allowing a serious primary challenger.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)all he talks about is his (brief) tenure in 2 congressional sessions. Pretty lame, it seems to me and then there's that dead intern...
BigDemVoter
(4,157 posts)Cha
(297,692 posts)Sam Wang, and Drew Linzer.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/us/politics/data-devotees-emerge-victorious-in-election.html?_r=0
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)acting like he and Nate were big buddies...