Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,013 posts)
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:22 AM Dec 2012

Obama Throws Boehner To The Wolves: "You Missed Your Opportunity"-&-“You get nothing”

Obama to Boehner: “You get nothing. I get that for free”


When Boehner asked Obama if they agree on a deal along the same lines as the one he walked away from during the 2011 talks, according to the paper, Obama retorted: “You missed your opportunity on that.”

Obama’s frustrations grew, and he told Boehner he would rail publicly against the Republicans in the absence of a reasonable compromise. As the Journal reports: Mr. Obama repeatedly lost patience with the speaker as negotiations faltered. In an Oval Office meeting last week, he told Mr. Boehner that if the sides didn’t reach agreement, he would use his inaugural address and his State of the Union speech to tell the country the Republicans were at fault.

..............

At one point, according to notes taken by a participant, Mr. Boehner told the president, “I put $800 billion in tax revenue on the table. What do I get for that?”

“You get nothing,” the president said. “I get that for free.” Also during the talks, as Obama bristled over Boehner’s unwillingness to budge on rates, the paper reports that he snapped: “You’re asking me to accept Mitt Romney’s tax plan. Why would I do that?”

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/obama_to_boehner_you_get_nothing_i_get_that_for_free/
160 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Throws Boehner To The Wolves: "You Missed Your Opportunity"-&-“You get nothing” (Original Post) kpete Dec 2012 OP
And then he proceeded to give Boeher a fresh set of 2012 concessions BlueStreak Dec 2012 #1
He didn't "give" him anything Proud Liberal Dem Dec 2012 #2
He put on the table BlueStreak Dec 2012 #48
I say liberalmike27 Dec 2012 #63
+1,000 freshwest Dec 2012 #93
We can't redistrict without a census. aquart Dec 2012 #101
Oh yes we can! Thunderbeast Dec 2012 #126
That's BS! southern_belle Dec 2012 #115
Please explain what "concessions" the President "gave" to the Speaker of the House.... OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #3
Social Security. Why is it on the table? grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #141
Is it? Or do you just want to believe that it is? nt. OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #145
From the Washington Post: grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #154
He "offered" things before riqster Dec 2012 #5
Speculative outrage is the best outrage...nt SidDithers Dec 2012 #6
}^D Kahuna Dec 2012 #11
A more perfect description of that one's bullshit I have yet to see alcibiades_mystery Dec 2012 #14
i can tweak that: unblock Dec 2012 #32
Sure... jberryhill Dec 2012 #43
I'm outraged at your lack of outrage jberryhill Dec 2012 #29
I swear, I only use a bit of laudanum to help me sleep... SidDithers Dec 2012 #39
It's poopy head, Moran ! jerseyjack Dec 2012 #50
It's the opium... From the poppies jberryhill Dec 2012 #53
Not speculative at all. woo me with science Dec 2012 #40
Why is it that all the Obama-haters feel the need to defend each other? MjolnirTime Dec 2012 #56
Right on cue: Try to make it about "hating Obama," rather than the policies: woo me with science Dec 2012 #62
Wait quakerboy Dec 2012 #100
Not only that: woo me with science Dec 2012 #132
well said. robinlynne Dec 2012 #143
It's always the same troop of clowns. MjolnirTime Dec 2012 #158
Ain't it though? Don't have to provide any backup or links. Cheap thrills. freshwest Dec 2012 #94
Out of the park again, Sid! Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #102
I'm in love with you!! LOL!!! Liberal_Stalwart71 Dec 2012 #113
Isn't it, though? Summer Hathaway Dec 2012 #118
I love it davidpdx Dec 2012 #149
Nice try sharp_stick Dec 2012 #8
When I first started visiting this site I thought it was a Democratic site, only. ywcachieve Dec 2012 #9
Obama was simply saying to Boehner that the $800B has already been agreed to. JDPriestly Dec 2012 #25
So did I. Then I found out it was A-OK with some people for Obama to cut SS. forestpath Dec 2012 #47
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #68
Your over the top defensive childish insult speaks for itself. forestpath Dec 2012 #85
Link to one post with a member over 1000 posts here that wants SS cut tjwash Dec 2012 #84
Can you back up what you just proffered? I would love to see a link. If you..... Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #104
This is not about Obama, but nice try: woo me with science Dec 2012 #66
Please read the About section, it's at the bottom of every page. A Simple Game Dec 2012 #79
It's amazing how invested some are in the idea of Obama letting us down. WilliamPitt Dec 2012 #31
It's amazing to me the peope who are just into cult of personalities. lark Dec 2012 #64
FUCKING BULLSHIT. SHOW ME THE LAW OBAMA SIGNED THAT CUT SS AND MEDICARE emulatorloo Dec 2012 #70
Don't hold your breath lark Jan 2013 #159
Speculation? lark Jan 2013 #160
Show me the cuts. WilliamPitt Dec 2012 #81
Lots of cuts have already been guaranteed, woo me with science Dec 2012 #133
So that's a total of none? WilliamPitt Dec 2012 #135
What didn't you understand there? nt woo me with science Dec 2012 #137
I understood everything. WilliamPitt Dec 2012 #139
Nothing like speculation to get you guys going. They hyperbole is amusing. Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #105
Some of them are invested because they are PAID to post this divisive shit. emulatorloo Dec 2012 #75
that's a pernicious twisting of the minority opinion.... tomp Dec 2012 #151
Care to elaborate? Dyedinthewoolliberal Dec 2012 #41
Absolutely. And don't forget that this entire process was rigged from the outset woo me with science Dec 2012 #42
+2 byeya Dec 2012 #55
+1 forestpath Dec 2012 #46
Your ilk just cannot stand it when Obama wins, can you? MjolnirTime Dec 2012 #54
Unbelievable treestar Dec 2012 #58
Fuck that bullshit. I'll never understand why Skinner allows your crowd to endlessly lie emulatorloo Dec 2012 #65
Complete agreement from me on that observation, emulatorloo Hekate Dec 2012 #99
Sadly, I think truth has become a casualty of the desire for increased traffic. Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #106
Wow! Where did all these anti-free speech trolls come from? savannah43 Dec 2012 #119
DU ain't a First Amendment free-fire zone. backscatter712 Dec 2012 #122
Durr Hurr WilliamPitt Dec 2012 #136
Your despair is noted. n/t backscatter712 Dec 2012 #121
The Rs are beginning to realize they agreed to raise a lot of taxes Coyotl Dec 2012 #4
If we do go over the fiscal cliff... srichardson Dec 2012 #13
Call And Write Your Congresscritter... KharmaTrain Dec 2012 #17
I bet they will be hit due to the AMT patch-that-won't-happen. renie408 Dec 2012 #49
If we do go over the fiscal "cliff" = revenue problem solved. How else can that be accomplished? Coyotl Dec 2012 #24
+1 davidwparker Dec 2012 #114
The idea is to allow the Bush tax cuts on everyone to disappear and then JDPriestly Dec 2012 #26
The point is... jberryhill Dec 2012 #35
Well said...nt SidDithers Dec 2012 #77
Uh, no it won't affect 2012 tax returns. It wouldn't be retroactive. Ineeda Dec 2012 #88
My check was reduced srichardson Dec 2012 #95
AMT oldandbitter Dec 2012 #110
Exactly and they are trying to welch on the deal they made previously.... Historic NY Dec 2012 #36
Not so much a set-up... HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #103
This is the kind of info that should have been posted a week ago. Baitball Blogger Dec 2012 #7
Help Vietnameravet Dec 2012 #10
How is it unreasonable after Obama gave the GOP 95% of what they wanted and they still said no? high density Dec 2012 #16
The $800 billion is saved and obtained in increased revenue if we go over the fiscal cliff. JDPriestly Dec 2012 #34
There is another area where just as much can be saved as by cutting defense waste DFW Dec 2012 #147
Boehner was offering to let the Prez keep $800B of the $1T+ bigbrother05 Dec 2012 #45
Which part of YOUR veterans benefits are you willing to give up to make angstlessk Dec 2012 #92
you are missing the part about Boner being asshole for YEARS Skittles Dec 2012 #148
Obama STILL should "use his inaugural address and his State of the Union speech to tell... FailureToCommunicate Dec 2012 #12
Obama STILL should "use his inaugural address and his State of the Union speech to tell... Flashmann Dec 2012 #28
Emphatic agreement from me on this. Time for Obama to start campaigning for coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #73
... woo me with science Dec 2012 #15
Excellent graph! high density Dec 2012 #18
It shows how obscenely tilted to the rich Obama's offers have been woo me with science Dec 2012 #19
Yep, that too high density Dec 2012 #20
And super-obscenely anti-seniors, anti-Social Security. JDPriestly Dec 2012 #37
where? heaven05 Dec 2012 #27
had a class, 'how to lie with statistics'. Flashmann Dec 2012 #33
Also the name of an episode of The West Wing I believe davidpdx Dec 2012 #150
Nice chart. ProSense Dec 2012 #30
P for Propaganda, indeed. woo me with science Dec 2012 #57
Oooh, ProSense Dec 2012 #60
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #80
The propaganda here only rivals that of Glenn Beck and his "FEMA Camps". However, Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #107
Not propaganda. Unconscionably, it's news: woo me with science Dec 2012 #129
Excellent exegesis and analysis. Much appreciated. - n/t coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #90
how does this compare to the fiscal cliff cuts & revenue? wordpix Dec 2012 #59
Welcome to big league, Congressman. marble falls Dec 2012 #21
"You stole fizzy lifting juice. YOU GET NOTHING!" AllyCat Dec 2012 #22
He's like dealing with a fucking gun nutter. lonestarnot Dec 2012 #23
I am sure the exchange went something like this... rosesaylavee Dec 2012 #38
From Alternet. go west young man Dec 2012 #44
This is how deep and thick and ludicrous the corporate spin is, woo me with science Dec 2012 #51
You are so on the money. go west young man Dec 2012 #69
Thank you. I may repost this as an OP, adding your comment about the MIC. woo me with science Dec 2012 #74
Thanks for the time-line graph. I wonder when cuts to the bloated defense industry come in. Maineman Dec 2012 #76
Cuts? woo me with science Dec 2012 #128
Orange man cry cry cry CountAllVotes Dec 2012 #52
kick samsingh Dec 2012 #61
Heads up: It would be a good Karl Rove strategy to stir up animosity on a site like this one. Maineman Dec 2012 #67
This message was self-deleted by its author emulatorloo Dec 2012 #71
Agreed. And there are plenty of Fake Progressives here stirring up shit. Have no clue why Skinner emulatorloo Dec 2012 #72
Keep telling it.. SidDithers Dec 2012 #117
Maineman this site has always been about debate. go west young man Dec 2012 #86
There are still those who value debate DonCoquixote Dec 2012 #97
Rove's minions are trying to woo us with science... backscatter712 Dec 2012 #123
!!!! Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #146
Barack "Michael Corleone" Obama! "Here's my offer: Nothing." WinkyDink Dec 2012 #78
How long until Boehner wakes up with a dead prostitute in his bed? backscatter712 Dec 2012 #124
Or a live boy. ;-) WinkyDink Dec 2012 #138
Certainly a possibility... backscatter712 Dec 2012 #140
I know, but mine is part of an old expression. :-) WinkyDink Dec 2012 #155
Very true! backscatter712 Dec 2012 #156
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #82
Agreed. go west young man Dec 2012 #87
It's interesting that you wholeheartedly agree with that newly PPR'd troll. Hmmmm.... Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #109
Read post 86 of mine in this thread. go west young man Dec 2012 #120
Well said. nt woo me with science Dec 2012 #125
I still have that post bookmarked jaysunb Dec 2012 #130
Cheers! go west young man Dec 2012 #152
The "troll" was PPR'd. Nuff said. Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #144
The poster may have been a touch over the top go west young man Dec 2012 #153
"Over the top"? Ya think? Tarheel_Dem Dec 2012 #157
Emphatic K&R! Thanks for posting! - n/t coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #83
Here's where we're at now on the matter. go west young man Dec 2012 #89
K & R Scurrilous Dec 2012 #91
So, how long until Boehner wakes up in bed with a dead hooker? backscatter712 Dec 2012 #96
Ijust pray this is true.&I hope to God Obama is aware of all of the rage about SSCPI.Just say no! judesedit Dec 2012 #98
Actually, Boehner threw himself to the wolves...all the President had to do was watch. nt. OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #108
I hope he does the same thing this time and says since you walked away a second time Liberalynn Dec 2012 #111
Go Obama! Lady Freedom Returns Dec 2012 #112
I am still a little confused... humbled_opinion Dec 2012 #116
Finally FU-K continuity, expose the Cracked Actors !!!!! orpupilofnature57 Dec 2012 #127
To the GOP: Welcome to the second term, bitches Politicub Dec 2012 #131
Meanwhile, Democrats in the Senate vote billions for the military and Israel. woo me with science Dec 2012 #134
Seriously, then why is Social Security on the table? grahamhgreen Dec 2012 #142
 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
1. And then he proceeded to give Boeher a fresh set of 2012 concessions
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:26 AM
Dec 2012

I can't wait to see what 2013 brings.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
48. He put on the table
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:17 PM
Dec 2012

1) spending cuts greater than Bowles-Simson, but no defense cuts (whereas Simpson-Bowles addressed defense)

2) He quickly capitulated on his very clear, bold claims about taxation above the $250K level. He gave up both on the rate (with 37% being commonly discussed) and the threshold (unilaterally offering $400K)

3) He offered a major cut in Social Security payouts disguised as a technical adjustment called Chained CPI.

He did 1) entering the negotiations. He did 2) and 3) AFTER this supposed dialog occurred.

Let's at least get the time line right. Without that, it becomes fanciful fiction.

liberalmike27

(2,479 posts)
63. I say
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:54 PM
Dec 2012

Keep campaigning like it's a presidential election. We've got huge majorities on just about every issue on which they are resisting, and go for the House in 2014.

Get democrats to redistrict in states where they have control, to counter the massive republican state redistricting.

aquart

(69,014 posts)
101. We can't redistrict without a census.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 05:54 PM
Dec 2012

SO THANK YOU TO ALL THE GENIUSES WHO STAYED HOME FOR THAT ELECTION.

Thunderbeast

(3,418 posts)
126. Oh yes we can!
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:20 PM
Dec 2012

In most states, redistricting is legal at any time the legislature chooses. Tom DeLay led the effort to re-district Texas in 2004 when the state legislature and the state house were in partisan Republican control. Six GOP seats were locked up so that Democrats are wildly outnumbered. Your point, however, is correct in that state legislative districts as well as congressional districts have been drawn in many states to lock in safe Republican seats, and concentrate Democratic votes in a small number of urban districts. We must not be lazy about local and legislative races. How lines are drawn is the dark science of politics. It is seen as too wonky to attract attention, but it is the only reason that Republicans control the House of Representatives.

The next big GOP push (prior to 2016 I imagine) will be for states with Republican control to change their Electoral College voting from "winner take all" to assignment of electoral votes by congressional district with the statewide winner collecting the two votes for their Senators. Had that math been applied to the 2012 results, Romney would be the nominee.

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
3. Please explain what "concessions" the President "gave" to the Speaker of the House....
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:33 AM
Dec 2012

....unless you consider claims of what the President supposedly said, without ANY direct quotes, to be "concessions".

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
43. Sure...
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:05 PM
Dec 2012

Every time Obama unleashes a turd on the American public, it's them like you who run around shouting, "But look, there's corn in it!"

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
29. I'm outraged at your lack of outrage
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:44 AM
Dec 2012

If Obama bit the heads off live puppies, and I've heard nothing but silence from him on that, you would think it was fine.

And because you would think it was fine, it can only be because you are a poppy head.

 

MjolnirTime

(1,800 posts)
56. Why is it that all the Obama-haters feel the need to defend each other?
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:35 PM
Dec 2012

Perhaps you are worried that you are wrong so you cling to others like you rather than admitting the truth??

Like Cheerios in a bowl.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
62. Right on cue: Try to make it about "hating Obama," rather than the policies:
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:48 PM
Dec 2012

The Third Way will *always* try to make it about the man, rather than the policies
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1240&pid=193458


Obama is temporary. Our problem is that policies don't change from administration to administration. Our problem is that we have a systemic problem of entrenched corporate money and power in Washington, driving policy in both parties. And it just keeps getting worse.

When *Democrats* can look at this filthy deal, the guaranteed outcome of which is more austerity for the masses....when Democrats can look at the obscene offers coming even from our side, which tilt so heavily to the rich as to be laughable...

When Democrats can look at all this....look at the numbers and what will actually HAPPEN as a result of this deal.....and claim victory....

then we have a problem.


We have truly reached the stage of

War is Peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is Strength.

________________________________

Look at the numbers:


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2055232


$160 billion a year in tax cuts for the top 20%
$42 billion a year in tax cuts for the bottom 40%

clearly a plan that favors the rich











Summer Hathaway

(2,770 posts)
118. Isn't it, though?
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:41 PM
Dec 2012

It requires no facts, no stats, no quotes, no sources - only a handy list of anti-Obama talking points that can be regurgitated again and again, repeatedly posted under the guise of being an outspoken concerned citizen.

It also includes the easy out: When Obama doesn't do what the speculatively outraged have predicted he will do, they simply claim credit for having changed his mind by posting their screeds on a political message board.



ywcachieve

(365 posts)
9. When I first started visiting this site I thought it was a Democratic site, only.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:05 AM
Dec 2012

It seems like every time there is a positive report on President Obama, someone comes on to cast a negative note on it.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
25. Obama was simply saying to Boehner that the $800B has already been agreed to.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:40 AM
Dec 2012

As I understand it, that is the amount by which revenues are increased if we just go off the fiscal cliff.

And the fiscal cliff has already been agreed to.

Response to forestpath (Reply #47)

Tarheel_Dem

(31,239 posts)
104. Can you back up what you just proffered? I would love to see a link. If you.....
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 06:09 PM
Dec 2012

can't provide one, then you are part of the problem here at DU. Propagandizing isn't advocacy, and it's no substitute for debate. I'll wait over here for a link.---------->>>>>>>>>

 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
31. It's amazing how invested some are in the idea of Obama letting us down.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:45 AM
Dec 2012

It's almost like you need it to happen.

lark

(23,147 posts)
64. It's amazing to me the peope who are just into cult of personalities.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:55 PM
Dec 2012

No matter what Obama does, it's OK because he's the OBAMA! Cutting SSI, Medicare, fine, as long as Obama says it's OK. Who cares that it hurts people unnecessarily and gives a huge boon to the richest, who cares that he ran on the exact opposite? Not these cheer leaders. I happen to care more about policy and results than personality and will rightly condemn Obama when he acts just like a Repug. I will also support him when he's right and hope to see much more of that.

emulatorloo

(44,175 posts)
70. FUCKING BULLSHIT. SHOW ME THE LAW OBAMA SIGNED THAT CUT SS AND MEDICARE
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:02 PM
Dec 2012

Sick of you ideologues and your treatment of speculation as fact.

lark

(23,147 posts)
159. Don't hold your breath
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 01:30 PM
Jan 2013

He's put this on the table multiple times, most recently on Meet the Press, chosen a catfood commission to do this exact thing, so go ahead bury your head in the sand. When Obama says he's going to do this, it's not speculation on my part to repeat his "threat". Go ahead, think nothing but good of Obama, and be utterly shocked when he does sign the deal to cut SSI and Medicare. Of course, you will probably deny it's a real cut - it's "saving" the programs, you will huff in high disdain.


Hope you have a great day in the land of denial.

lark

(23,147 posts)
160. Speculation?
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 08:03 PM
Jan 2013

Obama volunteered the CPI reduction on SS! It didn't become law yet because Repugs are too stupid to stop at yes. I'm praying it doesn't become law, but it won't be because Obama defends it.

Ideologues, really? I thought I was supporting policies that help workers, didn't know wanting to keep SSI & Medicare intact makes one an ideologue instead?

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
133. Lots of cuts have already been guaranteed,
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:40 PM
Dec 2012

no matter which option comes to pass. There is a trigger, remember?

There will *always* be cuts that didn't happen. There always has to be a worse offer that we were "saved" from. That's how the game is played.

 

tomp

(9,512 posts)
151. that's a pernicious twisting of the minority opinion....
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 09:28 AM
Dec 2012

....and frankly, casting such aspersions ought to be beneath you. that's no way to argue.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
42. Absolutely. And don't forget that this entire process was rigged from the outset
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:05 PM
Dec 2012

to give us austerity.

That was the purpose of the faux Kabuki Theater debt ceiling Shock Doctrine "crisis" in the first place: to set up a faux crisis and closed door meetings to create a chain of events in which massive budget slashing, or a trigger with slightly less massive budget slashing, were the only possible outcomes.

The ONLY possible outcomes.

They'll save some portion of Social Security or Medicare and brag about it, as though withholding a contrived, threatened assault means we got a good deal...but look at the NUMBERS. Look at the OFFERS. The goal all along was to force austerity on America, and they have already guaranteed that.



 

MjolnirTime

(1,800 posts)
54. Your ilk just cannot stand it when Obama wins, can you?
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:34 PM
Dec 2012

You have to find some way to twist it into a loss.

Pitiful.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
58. Unbelievable
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:41 PM
Dec 2012

Obama could shoot Boner in the town square at high noon and we'd still be hearing this bullshit. Clearly there is nothing that's going to move you from this position.

savannah43

(575 posts)
119. Wow! Where did all these anti-free speech trolls come from?
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:56 PM
Dec 2012

Keep writing. You'll betray yourselves eventually.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
122. DU ain't a First Amendment free-fire zone.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:11 PM
Dec 2012

It's a private web site, which has had rules like "No conservatives" and "No disruptors" in place since day one.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
4. The Rs are beginning to realize they agreed to raise a lot of taxes
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:36 AM
Dec 2012


They did not account for the fact that we ARE going over the cliff! Now, taxes go up, revenue goes up, and they cannot blame the Dems.

What is so ironic about all this is the Party of Obstruction has gotten obstructed. The Dems only do nothing, and the Bush tax cuts go away!

It was a set-up and they did not see it coming!

srichardson

(81 posts)
13. If we do go over the fiscal cliff...
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:15 AM
Dec 2012

will it affect my 2012 tax return. As a lower middle class family, I am a teacher and hubby is a supervisor at Coca-Cola, an increase in taxes will have us paying in. And it will hurt. We already live paycheck to paycheck, one paycheck away from homelessness, this worries me. My check is already being reduced bc my dad was recently diagnosed w cancer and my four year old has been very ill this last month. Bc teachers already make a shit salary, losing $240 from a piddly paycheck has already caused us undo financial heartache. My stress level is at a 12 and i know I will miss even more work once dad starts chemo. Its sad we live in a country where these types of medical issues can bankrupt us. If we end up w a higher tax bill, I feel like we may as well start packing to move. I know this post is a rambling complaint, but loving, caring, and teaching students should be a profession that we teachers should not have the added stress of choosing between paying bills or feeding your family.

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
17. Call And Write Your Congresscritter...
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:25 AM
Dec 2012

Welcome to DU...

If we go over the "cliff" almost all of our taxes will return back to the Clinton era levels. There's a very strong chance that even if we go past Jan 1 with no deal, one will be worked out that will be retroactive to Jan 1 that would mean no rise in taxes for at least 98% of us. The key is the House...they're the ones who will either make or break a deal, still...and if Boner can find 25 or so rushpublicans who will agree to raising taxes on the rich. So far Boner has avoided finding the votes in hopes of keeping his fractured coalition together. He failed...and he may lose his leadership role if he pushes any further this year. Thus many "pundits" are now expecting us to "go over the cliff" (more like a speed bump) and after Boner's given a new term as Speaker then he'll make a real deal. But there's no sure thing in this toxic atmosphere.

It's a shame that teachers are taken for granted and treated so poorly. My daughter and son-in-law are teachers and I see how hard they work and are dedicated to their professions and how little they get back in not only compensation but respect. I'll leave that for another post another time.

You'll find a lot of interesting information and viewpoints on the this and other issues here.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
49. I bet they will be hit due to the AMT patch-that-won't-happen.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:24 PM
Dec 2012

I am guessing at teacher and a supervisor at Coca Cola make more than $75,000 added together. On top of their taxes going up, they are going to be hit with a jump due to the AMT.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
24. If we do go over the fiscal "cliff" = revenue problem solved. How else can that be accomplished?
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:38 AM
Dec 2012

Then, the next Congress proposed to restore the Bush tax cuts to those making under $250k.
Let the Rs even try to vote against that, and their party is over!

Meanwhile, capital gains taxes are raised back where they belong, and there simply is no other way to accomplish restoring that theft by the rich. Also, those over 250k are payiong their share again. Everyone wins except the 2% because we have the revenue to deal with problems.

Take the Cliff, and enjoy the ride. All will be far better and there will be money to hire back the quarter million lost educators.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
26. The idea is to allow the Bush tax cuts on everyone to disappear and then
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:43 AM
Dec 2012

pass a bill reinstating the tax cuts for the middle class. So if you are middle class, you should be OK. What is middle class? Depends on where Congress draws the line. $250,000 per year is, thus far, a figure that has been mentioned.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
35. The point is...
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:50 AM
Dec 2012

The tax cuts for the rich are untenable, and the R's will not agree to anything while they don't quite realize that there is a default option - going over the cliff.

After we go over the cliff, we will immediately have legislation to provide tax relief to those under 250K.

In order for that not to pass, the Republicans are going to have to stand up and vote against a tax cut for 98% of Americans, and including 97% of small businesses.

If they do that, there will not be any Republicans in the next Congress.

Ineeda

(3,626 posts)
88. Uh, no it won't affect 2012 tax returns. It wouldn't be retroactive.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:41 PM
Dec 2012

So don't make things up and don't stress about made-up stuff.

I, frankly, can't understand how your dad's cancer has reduced your check. (???)

But best wishes for a better year.

srichardson

(81 posts)
95. My check was reduced
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 04:31 PM
Dec 2012

due to my school not working with those who have medical emergencies in their immediate family. Because i went over my sick days (which I don't see how they figured the number) I lost pay bc i was spending time in the hospital w him. I wanted to be with him and my mother (both elderly) bc they were terrified. He had major surgery to remove most of the colon. Now when chemo starts i wont have the option to provide support during sickness from chemo. It will be hard on them but i cannot afford to lose money from my check.
The reason for the question about it affecting this year is I have seen posts referring to IRS people saying returns may be delayed by months if we go off the cliff bc the tax laws wld be different. I think it was speaking of the payroll tax break we have been receiving. So, sorry if you thought i was making it up or whining about dads illness. That wasn't my intention. One point i was trying to make is that in a country as advanced as ours, we should be able to spend time w a dying family member wo fear of losing pay instead of waiting on them to die to get time for the funeral.

oldandbitter

(1 post)
110. AMT
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 06:40 PM
Dec 2012

While the tax rates themselves don't go into effect until 2013, you could be impacted by the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). The temporary patch to adjust for inflation was only applicable through 2011. I wish I knew more about the AMT, such as what the cut-offs would be without the adjustment, but you can probably find that info through a search. Good luck with both your father and being a teacher in Oklahoma (I'm a native Okie whose mother was a teacher).

Regards

Historic NY

(37,452 posts)
36. Exactly and they are trying to welch on the deal they made previously....
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:50 AM
Dec 2012

Boehner, Cantor & Mcconnell are joining hands and jumping.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
103. Not so much a set-up...
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 06:05 PM
Dec 2012

as it was that Rs took it for granted they'd take control of the Senate, and had a real good chance at WH. I know a couple activists who were really shocked they didn't win. I warned them the war on women was going to blow up in their faces, but they poo-pooed that.

 

Vietnameravet

(1,085 posts)
10. Help
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:09 AM
Dec 2012

I heard this part about Boehner putting $800 billion on the table and the President saying Boehner gets nothing and he gets that for free.. and my wife and I thought "that makes the President seem unreasonable" I figure there has got to me more to the story than that...But what am I missing?

high density

(13,397 posts)
16. How is it unreasonable after Obama gave the GOP 95% of what they wanted and they still said no?
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:25 AM
Dec 2012

Obama has nothing to lose at this point. The Republicans have proven themselves to be unable to consider any compromise at all yet again.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
34. The $800 billion is saved and obtained in increased revenue if we go over the fiscal cliff.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:48 AM
Dec 2012

Obama already signed the bill that requires cuts and increased taxes for that amount of money.

The negotiations going on now need to be more favorable.

And cutting Social Security is extremely unpopular, that is the chained CPI for Social Security is extremely unpopular. No one has anything to gain by cutting Social Security -- not politically.

The Republicans wanted to avoid the fiscal cliff because it requires cutting military spending. I personally favor cutting military spending. That is where the "fat" in our budget is to be found. We can have a quality defense without the waste. That should be our goal.

DFW

(54,436 posts)
147. There is another area where just as much can be saved as by cutting defense waste
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 04:07 AM
Dec 2012

The trouble is, there are huge entrenched interests that will fight reform tooth and nail, and Obama knows it.

Our health care cost system is a perverted mess. Obama said he would like to save a lot in getting health care costs down. He can. We can. The trouble is, the cost of health care is wildly inflated in the USA. I had two operations in 2011 that involved specialists and three day hospital stays. One was in Germany. The other was back home in Dallas. The one in Germany cost about $11,000 and my American insurance balked at covering it. The one in Dallas cost $36,000, later "discounted" to $26,500 for the insurance company (standard practice, but only for insurance companies, never for individuals--and no one could ever tell me why). Multiply the difference, even between $26,500 and $11,000, to the cost of operations, chemotherapies, etc., performed in the USA in a year, and the scope becomes rather large.

I don't know how much priority will be attached to this as opposed to defense, but I told this exact story to President Obama last summer, and he took note of it. I know that because I got a follow up email from the White House about it. Whether or not it's in their power to do anything about it is another story entirely. The health insurance industry has billions at their disposal to fight any legislation that might reduce their capacity to keep the current system in place, and they have every incentive to use that money. The people of the United States have every incentive to make the system change.

bigbrother05

(5,995 posts)
45. Boehner was offering to let the Prez keep $800B of the $1T+
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:12 PM
Dec 2012

he would get without doing anything. If all the taxes revert, there is way more than $800B coming in.

The fiscal cliff was created during the bargaining for lifting the debt ceiling by the Repubs and PBO got some language in it to make sure the RW had pain as well, ie Pentagon cuts. When the Simpson-Bowles deal was rejected in Congress (thanks P. Ryan), the House never took any serious action. Now the RW posturing has brought us to another impasse and the Prez can get more revenue than he's asked for with no cuts to programs without doing anything and the majority of the public blames it on the GOP.

Once the deadline is passed, there is a new political/policy reality that will allow the Prez to take an even higher ground with advocating for middle and lower class tax cuts and protecting our at risk populations.

FailureToCommunicate

(14,020 posts)
12. Obama STILL should "use his inaugural address and his State of the Union speech to tell...
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:14 AM
Dec 2012

the country the Republicans were at fault."

He definitely should follow thru on that threat.

Flashmann

(2,140 posts)
28. Obama STILL should "use his inaugural address and his State of the Union speech to tell...
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:44 AM
Dec 2012

I enthusiastically agree........Whether or not an agreement is reached,the President should bring the shit hammer down on them....That poisonous mind set needs quashed at every opportunity....

 

coalition_unwilling

(14,180 posts)
73. Emphatic agreement from me on this. Time for Obama to start campaigning for
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:04 PM
Dec 2012

the 2014 mid-terms by running against the 'Do-Nothing Congress.'

We've got them on the mat now and the 10-count has begun. Time to finish the job in 2014 with Dem majorities in both House and Senate (and Rs destined for the dustbin of history).

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
19. It shows how obscenely tilted to the rich Obama's offers have been
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:28 AM
Dec 2012

after Democrats supposedly won this election.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
37. And super-obscenely anti-seniors, anti-Social Security.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:51 AM
Dec 2012

I'm wondering why I spent so many hours working for Obama. He certainly is not working to protect my Social Security, i.e., my livelihood. This is some thanks. What an ungrateful person. What an ungrateful nation.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
27. where?
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:43 AM
Dec 2012

Anyone can make a graph with statistics. At Boston U, I had a class, 'how to lie with statistics'. Where from any government form signed off on by our President does this graph come? Go continue sharpening you knife brutus.

Flashmann

(2,140 posts)
33. had a class, 'how to lie with statistics'.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:46 AM
Dec 2012

Reminds me of a Benjamin Disraeli quote...Something like: There are lies,damned lies and statistics...

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
30. Nice chart.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:45 AM
Dec 2012

Obama's first offer was strong (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021905787). He should have stuck with that.

His third offer sucks, and the problem is he is negotiating with Republicans.

Any, and I mean any, deal out of this Congress is going to suck in some ways. You don't have to be happy, but don't pretend there is an alternative.

I mean, you can close your eyes and pretend that Republicans don't exist and that they're not the majority in the House. You can also play a game in your head where you envision them doing anything to make you happy.

There are only three things coming out of this Congress: a half-bad (or half-good, depending on your perspective) deal, a bad deal or nothing.

You can push for nothing if it's bad, but for the rest you have to decide what's good enough to accept. If that's unacceptable, go back to pushing for nothing.

That's the reality.

An offer is not a deal, which means both sides agree.

The first offer was a really good one that was never going be accepted by Boehner. Anything Boehner accepts that's not out desperation is going to suck, and that's why going over the cliff is seen as the better path.

We can go on all day about the logic behind the President's third offer, but the end result is: no deal. Boehner rejected it.

The President knows something you obviously can't wrap your head around: Boehner can't accept any deal that raises taxes on the rich. He doesn't have the votes.

Report: White House Considers Smaller Fiscal Cliff Deal
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022049743

After a dramatic week, Social Security is again off the table
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022052075

"clearly a plan that favors the rich "

P is for propaganda.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2055558



Response to woo me with science (Reply #57)

Tarheel_Dem

(31,239 posts)
107. The propaganda here only rivals that of Glenn Beck and his "FEMA Camps". However,
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 06:30 PM
Dec 2012

Glenn Beck is just much better at it, as witnessed by the extremely poor showing of the alternatives to Obama in this past election. The far left couldn't manage 1% of the popular vote against him combined. The Roseanne Party, The Jill Stein Party, The Rocky Anderson Party lost in spectacular fashion, and they're pissed, more now than ever. Expect the propaganda to increase, just in time for these groups to cut him off at the knees for the 2014 midterms.

 

go west young man

(4,856 posts)
44. From Alternet.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:09 PM
Dec 2012
http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-right/obama-will-ride-rescue-republicans I tend to think the writer has a point. The country has swung so far right that many here on DU see any ground gained back to the center as a victory. I'm a New Deal dem myself. The question now would be why even bother going after entitlements when the opposition doesn't have a leg to stand on? Why give them what they want still? Why not go after the military budget and ensure entitlements? After all we did just win the election. I would like to see Obama as FDR rather than as Abe Lincoln.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
51. This is how deep and thick and ludicrous the corporate spin is,
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:26 PM
Dec 2012

and this is how thoroughly we have been steeped in Third Way propaganda...

that any Democrat can look at these numbers and claim that we are winning or being honestly represented in any way.

Don't forget that this entire process was rigged from the outset to give us austerity.

That is how it BEGAN last spring, and that was the corporatists' goal from the outset: to ensure that austerity and budget slashing are guaranteed as an outcome of this process. That was the purpose of the faux Kabuki Theater debt ceiling Shock Doctrine "crisis" in the first place: to set up a faux crisis and closed door meetings to create a chain of events in which massive budget slashing, or a trigger with slightly less massive budget slashing, were the only possible outcomes.

The ONLY possible outcomes.


It is the stale, familiar, old "lesser of two evils" game by corporatists who own both parties now. Corporate Democrats will ostentatiously withhold a threatened assault on some portion of Social Security or Medicare so that they can point to it and claim to be working hard for us, but the goal all along was to force austerity on America, and they have already guaranteed that.

Look again at the offers from the DEMOCRATIC side, even after we won this election. They are Absurd. They are so heavily tilted to the rich that this could be a Monty Python skit.

We live in a corporate illusion of representative government. Look at the NUMBERS, and tell us that these offers make any sense at all from a party that supposedly won this election by a landslide and that pretends to be representing the people. Nothing from Democrats about cutting the MIC. Nothing about cutting corporate welfare. Nothing about citting the police state. And in a country where Americans overwhelmingly oppose austerity and favor protecting Social Security and Medicare.

It is a travesty. Look at the Offers.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2055232


$160 billion a year in tax cuts for the top 20%
$42 billion a year in tax cuts for the bottom 40%

clearly a plan that favors the rich






 

go west young man

(4,856 posts)
69. You are so on the money.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:01 PM
Dec 2012

The thing that is missing from all that negotiating is of course the military budget. The elephant in the room that no one dare mention. Most folks at DU these days have forgotten what we dems really fight for. Who could believe that once again we have control and we are going to negotiate with ourselves and concede to the other side what they want. Your right it is like a Monty Python skit. The Republicans would be the Judeans Peoples Front from "Life Of Brian". We are the slave who is asked "hanging or crucification".

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
74. Thank you. I may repost this as an OP, adding your comment about the MIC.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:04 PM
Dec 2012

It is sick that we have come to this.

Maineman

(854 posts)
67. Heads up: It would be a good Karl Rove strategy to stir up animosity on a site like this one.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 12:58 PM
Dec 2012

As far as I know, there is no background check to see who gets to post on this site.

And, it would be wise to listen carefully and give commenters and posters a little room to be imperfect with their messages.

Remember, conservatives and Republicans are at war with liberals, progressives, and common sense types. They will use any trick they can think of.

Response to Maineman (Reply #67)

emulatorloo

(44,175 posts)
72. Agreed. And there are plenty of Fake Progressives here stirring up shit. Have no clue why Skinner
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:04 PM
Dec 2012

allows it. Trolls must donate a lot, Koch Bros have deep pockets. The same loud handful, liars every one

 

go west young man

(4,856 posts)
86. Maineman this site has always been about debate.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 01:31 PM
Dec 2012

Plenty of righties post here and plenty of hard progressives. It's all welcome in my mind. This debate isn't edgy and it isn't going to weaken our leadership position. If anything it's just a mild DU discussion. You are correct in believing these threads are trolled by Freepers and govt agencies. That goes without a doubt.

In my mind DU has become quite centrist since 2008. I used to love old DU when it was hardcore left and lots of articulate progressives posted here. There are still a few great ones. (Time For Change, Peace Patriot, H2O man come to mind.) But the site has definitely taken a centrist turn since the early days. Maybe that explains why Obama won. We moved to the center. Yet I would personally like to see the country become much more aggressively progressive. And I would like to see DU swing more left. Just my two cents. Peace.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
97. There are still those who value debate
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 04:57 PM
Dec 2012

But I think what happened is that everyone, both left and right, began to value discussion less. It became less of a search for truth, and more of a war. This of course, allows for people to be manipulated, and rewards those who are clever, as opposed to smart.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
140. Certainly a possibility...
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:16 PM
Dec 2012

but a dead girl would be more in keeping with the tradition of the Corleones...

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
156. Very true!
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 02:15 PM
Dec 2012

I was just thinking of what happened to Senator Geary in Godfather II.

Boy, I'll bet he was happy that Tom Hagen was there to help him cover up the mess afterwards. After that, he was very friendly with the Corleones (because he didn't want to find out what would happen if he wasn't...)

Response to kpete (Original post)

 

go west young man

(4,856 posts)
120. Read post 86 of mine in this thread.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:08 PM
Dec 2012

You sum up the point I made in that post. You throw out an accusation attacking my character because I agreed with someone you believe is a troll. Maybe the person you believe is a troll is actually just a very hardcore lefty who is mad about Obama not being progressive enough. DU used to be about solid well thought out debate not simplistic name calling. You may want to do some research on myself. I'm an easy DU'er to find if you Google Go West Young Man Democratic Underground. Here's a thread of mine for your consideration. Maybe I can get an apology afterward? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8768651 It may help you to form an opinion instead of making accusations that are groundless.

jaysunb

(11,856 posts)
130. I still have that post bookmarked
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:31 PM
Dec 2012

and refer to it often. And btw, don't hold your breath waiting for that apology.

 

go west young man

(4,856 posts)
153. The poster may have been a touch over the top
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 12:43 PM
Dec 2012

with their anger towards Obama but did they really need to be PPR'd? They were obviously passionate about being truly progressive. They weren't espousing a right wing cause.I personally don't find it disruptful and I also think PPRing has quickly become quite ridiculous. We may have lost a valuable member because "you" didn't like what they wrote. I hope we can have thicker skin than that. In other words just because someone is PPR'd by you doesn't add credence to your argument.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,239 posts)
157. "Over the top"? Ya think?
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 03:20 PM
Dec 2012
The poster even threw in a little racism just to top things off. It was a good MIRT decision. "Wall Street monkey"?

I think it's best to stop digging now. And for the record, the asshat wasn't PPR'd "by me". I have absolutely nothing to do with MIRT, nor was I the alerter. Apparently, I wasn't the only one who was offended, but you were certainly the only one to give a great big high five to a racist troll. Happy Holidays.
 

Liberalynn

(7,549 posts)
111. I hope he does the same thing this time and says since you walked away a second time
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 06:51 PM
Dec 2012

chained CPI is off the table.

Lady Freedom Returns

(14,120 posts)
112. Go Obama!
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:13 PM
Dec 2012

I hope he does chew them out on this in the State of the Union and the Inaugural Address.
We are being held hostage by a group of Teabag Reps in the house that refuse to see what we have to do. I still think those teabag backed trolls want us to because they think they can find a way to come out as heroes. You can't go over the cliff, but we can't go with their plans. With everything that has happened in the last year, we can not afford to. It WILL hurt a lot of people that are already just hanging on by a thread of a thread.

Those guys that are doing this in the House, they only have to worry about their districts that are Teabag Controlled. They do what they are told, they will get re-elected. The rest of us get to get beat up and ruined.

humbled_opinion

(4,423 posts)
116. I am still a little confused...
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:02 PM
Dec 2012

I certainly hope that Democrats vote for middleclass targeted tax cuts retroactive until 01JAN13. If they don't I will be quite pissed but besides that, it just seems to me like in the end we are all going to get screwed.

Here is an example, when Obama first championed the healthcare reform, I said definately needed, we need to help those that are getting screwed, it got passed and yes it does help many that were being screwed over but in the end it turned out that what we got was a government that has now forced all of us to purchase health insurance from the greediest and most evil of all corporations "The Insurance Industry" I don't see how that is a win.... There are no medical cost controls in the bill, there are no funds for increasing the number of doctors, there are taxes but none that will effect me unless somehow they get passed along to consumers... So in the end I am still not sold on the healthcare reform but I will resever complete judgement becasue I know that some have benefited for sure....

In this fiscal dillema, I feel the same way, cliff is supposed to hurt the rich but it is going to screw us all, I don't see the win in that, to be cynical it is a win for fiscal conservatives because they want the increased taxes to lower the debt...

I don't know maybe we are all being played for suckers.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
134. Meanwhile, Democrats in the Senate vote billions for the military and Israel.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:42 PM
Dec 2012

US Senate approves $211 million for ****** in new $633 billion war bill http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022060449

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Throws Boehner To T...