Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 06:22 AM Dec 2012

Scandal Alert: Congress Is Quietly Abandoning the 5th Amendment

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/12/scandal-alert-congress-is-quietly-abandoning-the-5th-amendment/266498/



What everyone must understand is that American politics doesn't work the way you'd think it would. Most people presume that government officials would never willfully withhold penicillin from men with syphilis just to see what would happen if the disease went untreated. It seems unlikely that officers would coerce enlisted men into exposing themselves to debilitating nerve gas. Few expected that President Obama would preside over the persecution of an NSA whistle-blower, or presume the guilt of all military-aged males killed by U.S. drone strikes. But it all happened.

Really thinking about all that may make it easier to believe what I'm about to tell you.

It may seem like imprisoning an American citizen without charges or trial transgresses against the United States Constitution and basic norms of Western justice dating back to the Magna Carta.

It may seem like reiterating the right to due process contained in the 5th Amendment would be uncontroversial.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scandal Alert: Congress Is Quietly Abandoning the 5th Amendment (Original Post) xchrom Dec 2012 OP
Good morning, xchrom....thank you for this article. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #1
happy solstice! xchrom Dec 2012 #2
A Merry Yule to you and thank you for both the song and the article. nt Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #19
The Constitution pretty much went away after the Enabling Act of 2001. hobbit709 Dec 2012 #3
we've been on a steady decline for a long time but 9/11 certainly was the nail in the coffin NoMoreWarNow Dec 2012 #4
The decline started a little earlier ashling Dec 2012 #10
Except for the sacrosanct and exalted Second Amendment indepat Dec 2012 #16
this is a madness that seems impervious to democratic influence NoMoreWarNow Dec 2012 #5
I understand constitutional rights... ag_dude Dec 2012 #6
It will always be someone else BlueinOhio Dec 2012 #7
It's the "War on Terror!" another_liberal Dec 2012 #8
Hyperbolic claptrap. nt RomneyLies Dec 2012 #9
Would you please elaborate? Jim Lane Dec 2012 #17
Fascism is a sneaky little f**ker, isn't it? marmar Dec 2012 #11
+1 xchrom Dec 2012 #12
recommend. n/t ProfessionalLeftist Dec 2012 #13
K&R'd! snot Dec 2012 #14
"Fuck the 5th as long as I get to keep the 2nd!!1!" bullwinkle428 Dec 2012 #15
kick woo me with science Dec 2012 #18
 

NoMoreWarNow

(1,259 posts)
4. we've been on a steady decline for a long time but 9/11 certainly was the nail in the coffin
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:40 AM
Dec 2012

assassination of JFK was the other nail.

 

NoMoreWarNow

(1,259 posts)
5. this is a madness that seems impervious to democratic influence
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:43 AM
Dec 2012

the fucking military-intelliegence,-industrial complex is fucking out of control.

ag_dude

(562 posts)
6. I understand constitutional rights...
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 09:08 AM
Dec 2012

...but sometimes we have to use common sense and do what is right.

Wait, got my discussions mixed up. Sorry.

 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
8. It's the "War on Terror!"
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 09:34 AM
Dec 2012

Although our genuine "Terrorist Enemies" now only number a few hundred (at most) some security geeks still see this as a situation equivalent with the darkest days of the American Civil War. One hundred and fifty years ago President Lincoln suspended Americans' civil liberties in order to win a desperate struggle to save our national union. The Dick Cheney administration claimed that precedent as justification for every kind of extra-Constitutional outrage imaginable. Sadly, we are still operating under the assumption our country will be overrun with "Towel-headed murders" if we allow the rule of law to be reimposed. Nonsense, pure nonsense!

It is long past time to restore our Civil Rights and Constitutional protections to, at least, their pre-9/11 standing.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
17. Would you please elaborate?
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 04:46 PM
Dec 2012

The OP and the linked article rest on two simple propositions: that Congress is moving toward authorizing indefinite detention without trial, and that such a law would violate the Fifth Amendment.

The support for the first proposition is in a New York Times story that's quoted in the linked article as follows:

Lawmakers charged with merging the House and Senate versions of the National Defense Authorization Act decided on Tuesday to drop a provision that would have explicitly barred the military from holding American citizens and permanent residents in indefinite detention without trial as terrorism suspects, according to Congressional staff members familiar with the negotiations.


The second proposition isn't defended in the linked article. The author takes it as a given that such a law would violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

Both propositions seem to me to be correct. Do you dispute the first, the second, or both, and what's the basis of your disagreement?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scandal Alert: Congress I...