Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:09 PM Dec 2012

(Puts flame suit on) Why is the media sweeping Newtown under the carpet/rug?-NRA getting to them?

I was just comparing media coverage of Littleton to Newtown.

I noticed that the media has returned to incessantly ranting about Bhengazi and the latest blizzard or weather system. CNN was interviewing Peter King this morning in a Hillary bash fest over Bhengazi. When they weren't doing that, they were covering the blizzard. NBC Nightly News last night had minimal coverage of the Newtown aftermath. They led with the blizzard, then the fiscal cliff I believe.

I thought-Oh ok, maybe this is how they handled Columbine as well. I went back into the archives located here:
http://tvnews.vanderbilt.edu/tvn-month-search.pl

Columbine led the national network newscasts every day for at least 2 work-weeks. Check it out. It wasn't swept under the carpet.

With Newtown, it wasn't even extensively covered on Good Morning America and Today on Tuesday, just 5 days after.

I can only assume that the media blew up the tragedy in Littleton, CO because George W. Bush was already running at that time and his main message was that he was going to "restore honor and dignity to the oval office" and morality in America if you recall. School shootings kind of fed into Bush's message that America was morally off track and we all know how the media was a mouth-piece for the 2000 Shrub campaign against Al Gore.

Perhaps, with Newtown and 20 beautiful little babies dead, the media and their puppet masters see the extreme danger to them-regulation of violence on TV, tighter gun control, regulation of violent video games, President Obama who they despise comforting the victims and working to end the scourge of youth and gun violence perhaps making his approval ratings go even higher.

We saw the same thing in Aurora. The media swept the Batman massacre under the rug quickly as well because I suspect they feared that President Obama being able to be comforter-in-chief and POTUS hurt their guy Romney's campaign and took the focus off Mittens.

If the focus is on Bhengazi, the fiscal cliff, and blizzards, the NRA and their Republican friends can weasel out 0of passing any meaningful legislation. Is that what the media is up to here?

If I am not being conspiracy-theory oriented, why does a massacre where 12 adults and kids are killed get 24/7 coverage for a month where a massacre where 20 babies are killed just gets attention for 4 days?

P.S.: Anderson Cooper and CNN are the only ones not sweeping this under the carpet but I suspect that's just because they see this as a way to boost their ratings, which suck. The coverage of this has been nowhere near as extensive as Columbine and I am left to wonder why...

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. My local news led with funerals and a piece about guns, gun control and
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:14 PM
Dec 2012

more women using a firing range....

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
3. That's good to know
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:17 PM
Dec 2012

I also just remembered that the war in Kosovo was raging on April 19, 1999 as well, the day of Columbine. Perhaps the media wanted something else to focus on since they had been covering Kosovo since March 24 when the war started.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
2. The NRA sent out Bennett and Goehmert to say crazy things last weekend.
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:16 PM
Dec 2012

To see if those would fly at all. After some initial backlash against those idiots, a few more have stepped forward.

Then Perry tells a Teaparty group that we should arm Union Thugs, ooopps, Teachers, and the TeaParty cheered.

And then they trot out mental illness and violent games as a distraction. And then, "let's not knee-jerk" a "bad solution".

The media is now starting to play the "both sides" game.

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
5. My problem is the media seems not to be playing this story at all
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:18 PM
Dec 2012

Preferring to obsess over bashing Hillary who is leaving anyway over Bhengazi instead..

NewsCenter28

(1,835 posts)
13. You misread me
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:05 PM
Dec 2012

Sorry I meant they are obsessing over Bhengazi and Hillary is leaving anyway so why obsess over it? What's the point? Not that she is leaving over it. I know how you could have interpreted it that way though! Sorry for my weird wording! I am a huge proponent for Hillary '16. I should have wrote "bashing Hillary, who is leaving anyway, over Bhengazi instead." Bashing her over Bhengazi. Not leaving over it. Sorry!

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
10. I've noticed the same thing...
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:25 PM
Dec 2012

I've noticed the same thing...

Every evening this week when I arrived home and turn on the national news, they are interviewing one biased source or another re: the tragic events. Seems like the evening news shows are devoted to getting as many eyeballs on their broadcasts as possible.

blogslut

(38,019 posts)
9. It's been covered all day on MSNBC
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:23 PM
Dec 2012

Don't get me wrong, news outlets rotate stories as if they were radio playlists and coverage of Newtown will soon disappear until the inevitable "One Year Anniversary". I will also concede that Newtown as dropped from the lede to a secondary segment on most news programs and publications.

Just the same, the coverage has not, as of yet, been "swept under" the carpet nor the rug.

forthemiddle

(1,383 posts)
14. Has any new information come out?
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:19 PM
Dec 2012

I haven't had the Tv on for the past few days so maybe I missed it but if there is no new info it then becomes exploitation and I, for one, am glad they are moving on to other things.
Don't you ever wonder if the over exposure of these tragedies enhance the chance of copy cats?

blogslut

(38,019 posts)
17. Well, I've only been watching MSNBC
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 11:02 PM
Dec 2012

But no, no new information. The station is discussing it/covering it in the abstract - meaning the funerals that have been held, the effect on the town and of course, gun control.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
12. It only stays as long as people are interested.
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 07:31 PM
Dec 2012

I'm sorry to say that this is going to be put in the rear view very soon. People are already sick of hearing about it. Here's the play by play, they'll pass a toothless bill in congress, everyone will congratulate themselves and everyone will go about their business until it happens again. Nothing of substance will come out of this.

 

OneMoreDemocrat

(913 posts)
16. I think it has to do with the media having a hard time finding the right tone to take...
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:26 PM
Dec 2012

in their reportage.

I don't really WANT to know more than I already do...I shied away from the names and photos when they were released, because it's just to awful to contemplate.

I really don't see any conspiracy, I honestly feel like they've done a fairly good job of respecting the families and the situation in general.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»(Puts flame suit on) Why ...